Effect of Computer-Aided Detection During Colonoscopy on Adenoma Detection Rate in a Community Hospital Setting: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Yohei Yabuuchi, Kazuya Hosotani, Yoshiki Morihisa, Yukie Fujio, Daisuke Oshikawa, Manami Oshita, Momoko Iketani, Kazuyuki Tsukamoto, Asuka Sone, Toshiya Nanjo, Ryoko Tatsuno, Kosuke Tanaka, Soichiro Nagao, Shinsuke Akiyama, Gensho Tanke, Masaya Wada, Shuko Morita, Satoko Inoue, Hobyung Chung, Yoshitaka Nishikawa, Tetsuro Inokuma
{"title":"Effect of Computer-Aided Detection During Colonoscopy on Adenoma Detection Rate in a Community Hospital Setting: Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Yohei Yabuuchi, Kazuya Hosotani, Yoshiki Morihisa, Yukie Fujio, Daisuke Oshikawa, Manami Oshita, Momoko Iketani, Kazuyuki Tsukamoto, Asuka Sone, Toshiya Nanjo, Ryoko Tatsuno, Kosuke Tanaka, Soichiro Nagao, Shinsuke Akiyama, Gensho Tanke, Masaya Wada, Shuko Morita, Satoko Inoue, Hobyung Chung, Yoshitaka Nishikawa, Tetsuro Inokuma","doi":"10.1111/den.15086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Computer-aided detection (CADe) is promising for improving adenoma detection rates (ADRs) but mostly in academic centers. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of CADe on ADR and related outcomes in a Japanese community hospital setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center, randomized controlled trial conducted between September 2022 and August 2023, patients were eligible for inclusion if they were 40 years of age or older and had undergone colonoscopy for screening, post-polypectomy surveillance, a positive fecal immunochemical test, or symptoms. Patients were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to undergo colonoscopy with or without CADe. The primary outcome was ADR. Secondary outcomes included the number of adenomas per colonoscopy (APC) and the withdrawal time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1041 patients were recruited. After exclusion, 497 and 501 patients in the control and CADe groups, respectively, were included in the analysis. ADR was 54.5% in the control group and 50.7% in the CADe group, with no significant difference between the groups (adjusted risk ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-1.05). The mean number of APC was lower in the CADe group than in the control group (1.34 vs. 1.14) (adjusted rate ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77-0.96). The mean withdrawal time was longer in the CADe group than in the control group (691 vs. 751 s, p = 0.034).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CADe did not significantly improve ADR in a Japanese community hospital setting, possibly due to the high baseline ADR in the control group. Further research is needed to understand in which settings CADe is useful.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000049054.</p>","PeriodicalId":72813,"journal":{"name":"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/den.15086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Computer-aided detection (CADe) is promising for improving adenoma detection rates (ADRs) but mostly in academic centers. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of CADe on ADR and related outcomes in a Japanese community hospital setting.

Methods: In this single-center, randomized controlled trial conducted between September 2022 and August 2023, patients were eligible for inclusion if they were 40 years of age or older and had undergone colonoscopy for screening, post-polypectomy surveillance, a positive fecal immunochemical test, or symptoms. Patients were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to undergo colonoscopy with or without CADe. The primary outcome was ADR. Secondary outcomes included the number of adenomas per colonoscopy (APC) and the withdrawal time.

Results: A total of 1041 patients were recruited. After exclusion, 497 and 501 patients in the control and CADe groups, respectively, were included in the analysis. ADR was 54.5% in the control group and 50.7% in the CADe group, with no significant difference between the groups (adjusted risk ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-1.05). The mean number of APC was lower in the CADe group than in the control group (1.34 vs. 1.14) (adjusted rate ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77-0.96). The mean withdrawal time was longer in the CADe group than in the control group (691 vs. 751 s, p = 0.034).

Conclusions: CADe did not significantly improve ADR in a Japanese community hospital setting, possibly due to the high baseline ADR in the control group. Further research is needed to understand in which settings CADe is useful.

Trial registration: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000049054.

社区医院结肠镜检查中计算机辅助检测对腺瘤检出率的影响:随机对照试验。
目的:计算机辅助检测(CADe)有望提高腺瘤检出率(adr),但主要是在学术中心。因此,我们在日本一家社区医院评估了CADe对不良反应和相关结局的影响。方法:在这项于2022年9月至2023年8月进行的单中心随机对照试验中,如果患者年龄在40岁或以上,并且接受过结肠镜筛查、息肉切除术后监测、粪便免疫化学试验阳性或症状,则符合纳入条件。患者按1:1的比例随机接受有或没有CADe的结肠镜检查。主要结局是ADR。次要结果包括每次结肠镜检查腺瘤的数量(APC)和停药时间。结果:共纳入1041例患者。排除后,对照组和CADe组分别有497例和501例患者被纳入分析。对照组不良反应发生率为54.5%,CADe组为50.7%,两组间差异无统计学意义(校正风险比为0.93;95%可信区间[CI], 0.83-1.05)。CADe组APC平均数目低于对照组(1.34 vs 1.14)(校正率比,0.86;95% ci, 0.77-0.96)。CADe组平均停药时间长于对照组(691 vs 751 s, p = 0.034)。结论:CADe没有显著改善日本社区医院的ADR,可能是由于对照组的基线ADR较高。需要进一步的研究来了解CADe在哪些情况下是有用的。试验注册:大学医院医学信息网临床试验注册:UMIN000049054。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信