Understanding contexts and mechanisms through which video based benchmarking promotes alignment of examiners' scoring in objective structured clinical exams.

IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Rebecca Jane Edwards, Peter Yeates, Janet Lefroy, Robert McKinley
{"title":"Understanding contexts and mechanisms through which video based benchmarking promotes alignment of examiners' scoring in objective structured clinical exams.","authors":"Rebecca Jane Edwards, Peter Yeates, Janet Lefroy, Robert McKinley","doi":"10.1007/s10459-025-10454-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aligning examiners judgements to a shared standard is desirable within Objective Structured Clinical Exams (OSCEs) because it accords with OSCEs' epistemic assumptions and purpose. Video-based benchmarking (VBB) involves examiners scoring station specific videos and comparing their judgements against an agreed score. Despite promising potential to enhance examiner alignment, VBB has been little researched. As the intervention's efficacy is likely influenced by context, we used Realist Evaluation to study how, why and under what circumstances VBB may aid examiner alignment. Within stimulated interviews, examiners viewed videos of year-3 student OSCE performances and received expert-panel derived benchmark information. Different participants experienced adaptations of VBB, including varying benchmark performance standards, and different timings of receiving the benchmark information. Our resulting middle range theory suggests that despite conscientious preparation with written material, examiners' expectations remain uncertain until encountering concrete performance examples. Judging a video serves this role, whilst comparison to a standard allows examiners to locate their judgement. Examiners experience dissonance when their scores are discrepant, and several contextual factors mediate whether they dismiss the suggested standard or adjust their perspectives. Examiners' degree of engagement with video observation and score reflection is critical to VBB's efficacy, and is influenced by examiner factors and other procedural contexts. These procedural contexts underpin tentative recommendations for practice which may enhance the likelihood of VBB's effectiveness. When conscientious examiners engage effectively with well-constructed benchmarks, they perceive themselves as more prepared and aligned in their judgements because comparative reflection produces adjustment to their frame of reference.</p>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-025-10454-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aligning examiners judgements to a shared standard is desirable within Objective Structured Clinical Exams (OSCEs) because it accords with OSCEs' epistemic assumptions and purpose. Video-based benchmarking (VBB) involves examiners scoring station specific videos and comparing their judgements against an agreed score. Despite promising potential to enhance examiner alignment, VBB has been little researched. As the intervention's efficacy is likely influenced by context, we used Realist Evaluation to study how, why and under what circumstances VBB may aid examiner alignment. Within stimulated interviews, examiners viewed videos of year-3 student OSCE performances and received expert-panel derived benchmark information. Different participants experienced adaptations of VBB, including varying benchmark performance standards, and different timings of receiving the benchmark information. Our resulting middle range theory suggests that despite conscientious preparation with written material, examiners' expectations remain uncertain until encountering concrete performance examples. Judging a video serves this role, whilst comparison to a standard allows examiners to locate their judgement. Examiners experience dissonance when their scores are discrepant, and several contextual factors mediate whether they dismiss the suggested standard or adjust their perspectives. Examiners' degree of engagement with video observation and score reflection is critical to VBB's efficacy, and is influenced by examiner factors and other procedural contexts. These procedural contexts underpin tentative recommendations for practice which may enhance the likelihood of VBB's effectiveness. When conscientious examiners engage effectively with well-constructed benchmarks, they perceive themselves as more prepared and aligned in their judgements because comparative reflection produces adjustment to their frame of reference.

理解背景和机制,通过基于视频的基准测试促进考官在客观结构化临床考试中的评分一致性。
在客观结构化临床考试(oses)中,将审查员的判断与共享标准保持一致是可取的,因为它符合oses的认知假设和目的。基于视频的基准测试(VBB)包括考官对特定的视频进行评分,并将他们的判断与商定的分数进行比较。尽管有希望提高考官对齐的潜力,但VBB的研究很少。由于干预的有效性可能受到情境的影响,我们使用现实主义评估来研究VBB如何,为什么以及在什么情况下可以帮助审查员对齐。在模拟访谈中,主考官观看了三年级学生欧安组织表现的视频,并获得了专家小组得出的基准信息。不同的参与者体验了VBB的适应性,包括不同的基准性能标准,以及接收基准信息的不同时间。我们得出的中间区间理论表明,尽管认真准备了书面材料,考官的期望仍然不确定,直到遇到具体的表现例子。对视频进行评判就是这个作用,而与标准进行比较可以让审查员定位他们的判断。当他们的分数不一致时,考官会经历不协调,并且几个上下文因素会影响他们是否驳回建议的标准或调整他们的观点。主考官对视频观察和分数反映的投入程度对VBB的有效性至关重要,并受到主考官因素和其他程序环境的影响。这些程序背景为实践提供了初步建议,这些建议可能会提高VBB的有效性。当认真的审查员有效地参与构建良好的基准时,他们认为自己在判断中准备得更充分,更一致,因为比较反思会对他们的参考框架进行调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Health Sciences Education is a forum for scholarly and state-of-the art research into all aspects of health sciences education. It will publish empirical studies as well as discussions of theoretical issues and practical implications. The primary focus of the Journal is linking theory to practice, thus priority will be given to papers that have a sound theoretical basis and strong methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信