Detecting co-occurring clusters of coronary heart disease and depression in New England neighborhoods

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Theresa N. Faller , Michael R. Desjardins
{"title":"Detecting co-occurring clusters of coronary heart disease and depression in New England neighborhoods","authors":"Theresa N. Faller ,&nbsp;Michael R. Desjardins","doi":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.06.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is increasing evidence that coronary heart disease (CHD) patients with a mental health disorder have increased risk of cardiovascular mortality. Studying this relationship beyond the individual at the neighborhood level could lead to novel public health interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Spatial scan statistics were used to detect potential co-occurring geographic clusters of CHD and depression among adults in the New England region of the United States during 2019. Negative binomial regression models were used to adjust cluster analyses for census-tract level estimates of relevant risk factors, including social vulnerability, urbanicity, walkability, greenspace, healthcare utilization, and access to mental health facilities.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nine significant adjusted clusters were identified, including six multivariate clusters and three univariate clusters for depression (none for CHD). The highest multivariate relative risk (RR) was seen in the cluster around Hartford County, CT (n=234 census tracts; Depression RR=1.06; CHD RR=1.06).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Clusters from adjusted analyses indicate clustering that is not explained by selected covariates alone, many of which were social determinants of health. Mixed-methods, longitudinal data, and individual-level approaches could help explain remaining clustering. The spatial methods employed in this study can more effectively identify high-risk areas where interventions, such as increasing mental health care utilization or enhancing health literacy, should be implemented for both conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50767,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Epidemiology","volume":"109 ","pages":"Pages 52-58"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1047279725001425","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There is increasing evidence that coronary heart disease (CHD) patients with a mental health disorder have increased risk of cardiovascular mortality. Studying this relationship beyond the individual at the neighborhood level could lead to novel public health interventions.

Methods

Spatial scan statistics were used to detect potential co-occurring geographic clusters of CHD and depression among adults in the New England region of the United States during 2019. Negative binomial regression models were used to adjust cluster analyses for census-tract level estimates of relevant risk factors, including social vulnerability, urbanicity, walkability, greenspace, healthcare utilization, and access to mental health facilities.

Results

Nine significant adjusted clusters were identified, including six multivariate clusters and three univariate clusters for depression (none for CHD). The highest multivariate relative risk (RR) was seen in the cluster around Hartford County, CT (n=234 census tracts; Depression RR=1.06; CHD RR=1.06).

Conclusions

Clusters from adjusted analyses indicate clustering that is not explained by selected covariates alone, many of which were social determinants of health. Mixed-methods, longitudinal data, and individual-level approaches could help explain remaining clustering. The spatial methods employed in this study can more effectively identify high-risk areas where interventions, such as increasing mental health care utilization or enhancing health literacy, should be implemented for both conditions.
检测冠心病和抑郁症在新英格兰社区共同发生的集群。
背景:越来越多的证据表明冠心病(CHD)合并精神健康障碍的患者心血管死亡风险增加。在社区层面上研究这种超越个人的关系可能会导致新的公共卫生干预措施。方法:采用空间扫描统计方法,检测2019年美国新英格兰地区成年人冠心病和抑郁症可能同时发生的地理集群。使用负二项回归模型调整聚类分析对相关风险因素的人口普适性水平估计,包括社会脆弱性、城市化、可步行性、绿地、医疗保健利用和获得精神卫生设施。结果:确定了9个显著的调整聚类,包括6个多因素聚类和3个单因素聚类(无冠心病)。多因素相对危险度(RR)最高的是康涅狄格州哈特福德县(n=234个人口普查区;抑郁症RR = 1.06;冠心病RR = 1.06)。结论:来自调整分析的聚类表明,聚类不能单独由选定的协变量解释,其中许多是健康的社会决定因素。混合方法、纵向数据和个人层面的方法可以帮助解释剩余的聚类。本研究中采用的空间方法可以更有效地识别高风险地区,在这些地区,应该针对这两种情况实施干预措施,如增加精神卫生保健的利用或提高健康素养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Epidemiology
Annals of Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The journal emphasizes the application of epidemiologic methods to issues that affect the distribution and determinants of human illness in diverse contexts. Its primary focus is on chronic and acute conditions of diverse etiologies and of major importance to clinical medicine, public health, and health care delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信