Using GenAI to Train Mental Health Professionals in Suicide Risk Assessment: Preliminary Findings.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Zohar Elyoseph, Inbar Levkovitch, Yuval Haber, Yossi Levi-Belz
{"title":"Using GenAI to Train Mental Health Professionals in Suicide Risk Assessment: Preliminary Findings.","authors":"Zohar Elyoseph, Inbar Levkovitch, Yuval Haber, Yossi Levi-Belz","doi":"10.4088/JCP.24m15525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Suicide risk assessment is a critical skill for mental health professionals (MHPs), yet traditional training in this area is often limited. This study examined the potential of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI)- based simulator to enhance self-efficacy in suicide risk assessment among MHPs.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> A quasiexperimental mixed methods study was conducted. Participants interacted with an AI-based simulator (AIBS) that embodied the role of a patient seeking suicide risk assessment. Each participant conducted a real-time risk assessment interview with the virtual patient and received comprehensive feedback on their assessment approach and performance. Quantitative data were collected through pre- and postintervention questionnaires measuring suicide risk assessment self efficacy and willingness to treat suicidal patients (using 11-point Likert scales). Qualitative data were gathered through open-ended questions analyzing participants' experiences, perceived benefits, and concerns regarding the AI simulator.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> Among the 43 participating MHPs, we found a significant increase in self efficacy scores from preintervention (mean = 6.0, SD = 2.4) to postintervention (mean = 6.4, SD = 2.1, <i>P</i> < .05). Willingness to treat patients presenting suicide risk increased slightly from (mean = 4.76, SD =2.64) to (mean = 5.00, SD = 2.50) but did not reach significance. Participants reported positive experiences with the simulator, with high likelihood to recommend to colleagues (mean = 7.63, SD =2.27). Qualitative feedback indicated that participants found the simulator engaging and valuable for professional development. However, participants raised concerns about overreliance on AI and the need for human supervision during training.</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> This preliminary study suggests that AIBSs show promise for improving MHPs' self-efficacy in suicide risk assessment. However, further research with larger samples and control groups is needed to confirm these findings and address ethical considerations surrounding AI use in suicide risk assessment training. AI powered simulation tools may have potential to increase access to training in mental health, potentially contributing to global suicide prevention efforts. However, their implementation should be carefully considered to ensure they complement rather than replace human expertise.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"86 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.24m15525","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Suicide risk assessment is a critical skill for mental health professionals (MHPs), yet traditional training in this area is often limited. This study examined the potential of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI)- based simulator to enhance self-efficacy in suicide risk assessment among MHPs.

Methods: A quasiexperimental mixed methods study was conducted. Participants interacted with an AI-based simulator (AIBS) that embodied the role of a patient seeking suicide risk assessment. Each participant conducted a real-time risk assessment interview with the virtual patient and received comprehensive feedback on their assessment approach and performance. Quantitative data were collected through pre- and postintervention questionnaires measuring suicide risk assessment self efficacy and willingness to treat suicidal patients (using 11-point Likert scales). Qualitative data were gathered through open-ended questions analyzing participants' experiences, perceived benefits, and concerns regarding the AI simulator.

Results: Among the 43 participating MHPs, we found a significant increase in self efficacy scores from preintervention (mean = 6.0, SD = 2.4) to postintervention (mean = 6.4, SD = 2.1, P < .05). Willingness to treat patients presenting suicide risk increased slightly from (mean = 4.76, SD =2.64) to (mean = 5.00, SD = 2.50) but did not reach significance. Participants reported positive experiences with the simulator, with high likelihood to recommend to colleagues (mean = 7.63, SD =2.27). Qualitative feedback indicated that participants found the simulator engaging and valuable for professional development. However, participants raised concerns about overreliance on AI and the need for human supervision during training.

Conclusion: This preliminary study suggests that AIBSs show promise for improving MHPs' self-efficacy in suicide risk assessment. However, further research with larger samples and control groups is needed to confirm these findings and address ethical considerations surrounding AI use in suicide risk assessment training. AI powered simulation tools may have potential to increase access to training in mental health, potentially contributing to global suicide prevention efforts. However, their implementation should be carefully considered to ensure they complement rather than replace human expertise.

使用GenAI培训精神卫生专业人员进行自杀风险评估:初步发现。
背景:自杀风险评估是精神卫生专业人员(MHPs)的一项关键技能,然而这一领域的传统培训往往有限。本研究考察了基于生成人工智能(GenAI)的模拟器在MHPs自杀风险评估中提高自我效能的潜力。方法:采用准实验混合方法进行研究。参与者与一个基于人工智能的模拟器(AIBS)进行互动,该模拟器体现了寻求自杀风险评估的患者的角色。每位参与者都对虚拟患者进行了实时风险评估访谈,并获得了有关其评估方法和表现的全面反馈。通过干预前和干预后的自杀风险评估、自我效能和治疗自杀患者的意愿问卷(采用11点李克特量表)收集定量数据。定性数据是通过开放式问题收集的,分析参与者的经历、感知到的好处和对人工智能模拟器的担忧。结果:在43名参与调查的MHPs中,我们发现自我效能得分从干预前(mean = 6.0, SD = 2.4)到干预后(mean = 6.4, SD = 2.1, P < 0.05)显著增加。治疗有自杀风险患者的意愿从(mean = 4.76, SD =2.64)略微增加到(mean = 5.00, SD = 2.50),但没有达到显著性。参与者报告了对模拟器的积极体验,并极有可能向同事推荐(平均值= 7.63,SD =2.27)。定性反馈表明,参与者认为模拟器具有吸引力,对专业发展很有价值。然而,参与者提出了对过度依赖人工智能以及在训练过程中需要人工监督的担忧。结论:本初步研究表明,AIBSs在自杀风险评估中有改善MHPs自我效能的希望。然而,需要更大样本和对照组的进一步研究来证实这些发现,并解决人工智能在自杀风险评估培训中使用的伦理问题。人工智能驱动的模拟工具可能有潜力增加获得心理健康培训的机会,可能有助于全球预防自杀的努力。但是,应仔细考虑它们的实施,以确保它们补充而不是取代人类的专门知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 75 years, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry has been a leading source of peer-reviewed articles offering the latest information on mental health topics to psychiatrists and other medical professionals.The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry is the leading psychiatric resource for clinical information and covers disorders including depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety, addiction, posttraumatic stress disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder while exploring the newest advances in diagnosis and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信