Quantification of Meta-Therapy in Conversation Training Therapy.

Abstract

Purpose: Meta-therapy (MT) is a clinical entity that plays a pivotal role in the success of voice therapy. This descriptive study is the first empirical research to describe and quantify the use of MT in comparison to other treatment modalities during conversation training therapy (CTT).

Method: Twenty-four prerecorded CTT sessions featuring six voice-specialized speech-language pathologists (SLPs) were converted into audio files and transcribed into text files. Trained annotators (experienced and novice voice-specialized SLPs) identified the use of MT and four other treatment modalities (direct treatment, education and indirect treatment, and counseling) during the therapy sessions. Descriptive statistics and intra- and inter-annotator agreements (Cohen's kappa) were generated.

Results: MT was used systematically throughout the course of CTT, both as a stand-alone therapeutic approach and in conjunction with other treatment modalities. When blended with other treatment modalities, MT accounted, on average, for 31% of all clinical dialogues within the course of treatment. Intra-annotation reliability was generally high. However, inter-annotator reliability was notably lower and did not differ between novice and experienced SLPs, not only for MT but also for the other four treatment modalities.

Conclusions: This study underscores the multifaceted nature of MT and supports the notion that it is a core element of voice therapy. We propose that MT could be formally taught to future SLPs alongside other clinical components (e.g., indirect treatment, direct treatment, and counseling). This study also highlights the need for standardization and operationalization of all key components of voice therapy.

Supplemental material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.29405753.