Robotic-assisted vs. traditional medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: a comparative study of surgical precision and clinical outcomes.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Hongzhi Fang, Zhenghui Shang, Tianli Du
{"title":"Robotic-assisted vs. traditional medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: a comparative study of surgical precision and clinical outcomes.","authors":"Hongzhi Fang, Zhenghui Shang, Tianli Du","doi":"10.1186/s12893-025-03012-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility and clinical effectiveness of reconstructing the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament (MPFL) using robotic-assisted reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study encompassed 46 patients who underwent medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction at Yichang People's Hospital between January 2022 and January 2024. Patients were categorized into a conventional surgery group (control group, n = 24) and a robot-assisted surgery group (experimental group, n = 22) based on whether robotic assistance was used during the procedure. The primary endpoints included the error margin between the femoral tunnel entry point, a predefined reference landmark, and the quantity of intraoperative fluoroscopic exposures. Secondary endpoints consisted of knee function scores at postoperative and final follow-up evaluations, patellar stability, operative duration, length of hospital stay, and intraoperative blood loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The experimental group demonstrated a significantly higher degree of precision in femoral tunnel placement than the control group, as indicated by a smaller mean distance from the tunnel entry point to the reference landmark (P < 0.05). Additionally, the experimental group markedly reduced intraoperative fluoroscopic exposures relative to the control group (P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding postoperative or final follow-up patellar stability or knee function scores (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the experimental group incurred significantly shorter hospital stays and experienced less intraoperative blood loss than the control group (P < 0.05). At the same time, the operative time did not present any significant differences between groups (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robot-assisted MPFL reconstruction significantly enhances femoral tunnel positioning accuracy and surgical efficiency compared to conventional methods. This approach offers a promising surgical option for improving precision and efficiency in the management of recurrent patellar dislocation, with potential implications for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"276"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-03012-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and clinical effectiveness of reconstructing the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament (MPFL) using robotic-assisted reconstruction.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study encompassed 46 patients who underwent medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction at Yichang People's Hospital between January 2022 and January 2024. Patients were categorized into a conventional surgery group (control group, n = 24) and a robot-assisted surgery group (experimental group, n = 22) based on whether robotic assistance was used during the procedure. The primary endpoints included the error margin between the femoral tunnel entry point, a predefined reference landmark, and the quantity of intraoperative fluoroscopic exposures. Secondary endpoints consisted of knee function scores at postoperative and final follow-up evaluations, patellar stability, operative duration, length of hospital stay, and intraoperative blood loss.

Results: The experimental group demonstrated a significantly higher degree of precision in femoral tunnel placement than the control group, as indicated by a smaller mean distance from the tunnel entry point to the reference landmark (P < 0.05). Additionally, the experimental group markedly reduced intraoperative fluoroscopic exposures relative to the control group (P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding postoperative or final follow-up patellar stability or knee function scores (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the experimental group incurred significantly shorter hospital stays and experienced less intraoperative blood loss than the control group (P < 0.05). At the same time, the operative time did not present any significant differences between groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Robot-assisted MPFL reconstruction significantly enhances femoral tunnel positioning accuracy and surgical efficiency compared to conventional methods. This approach offers a promising surgical option for improving precision and efficiency in the management of recurrent patellar dislocation, with potential implications for future research.

机器人辅助与传统内侧髌股韧带重建:手术精度和临床结果的比较研究。
目的:探讨机器人辅助髌股内侧韧带(MPFL)重建的可行性及临床效果。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入2022年1月至2024年1月在宜昌市人民医院行髌股内侧韧带重建的46例患者。根据手术过程中是否使用机器人辅助,将患者分为常规手术组(对照组,n = 24)和机器人辅助手术组(实验组,n = 22)。主要终点包括股骨隧道进入点之间的误差范围、预先确定的参考标记和术中透视暴露的数量。次要终点包括术后和最终随访评估时的膝关节功能评分、髌骨稳定性、手术时间、住院时间和术中出血量。结果:实验组股骨隧道置入的精确度明显高于对照组,从隧道入口点到参考地标的平均距离更小(P < 0.05)。实验组住院时间明显短于对照组,术中出血量明显少于对照组(P < 0.05)。结论:与传统方法相比,机器人辅助下MPFL重建可显著提高股骨隧道定位精度和手术效率。该方法为提高复发性髌骨脱位治疗的精度和效率提供了一种有希望的手术选择,对未来的研究具有潜在的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信