Barriers and facilitators of return to work for loss of income claimants: Healthcare workers' perspectives.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
African Journal of Disability Pub Date : 2025-06-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4102/ajod.v14i0.1442
Gofaone L Modise, Catharina J E Uys, Eileen du Plooy
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators of return to work for loss of income claimants: Healthcare workers' perspectives.","authors":"Gofaone L Modise, Catharina J E Uys, Eileen du Plooy","doi":"10.4102/ajod.v14i0.1442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Road traffic accidents (RTAs) are a global and public health concern affecting a third of the world's population mainly in low- to middle-income countries, particularly affecting young people. Returning to work (RTW) following an RTA is essential for better health and financial outcomes. The motor vehicle accident (MVA) Fund Botswana assists loss-of-income (LOI) claimants with medical assistance, compensates for loss, advocates and facilitates RTW.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aims to identify barriers to and facilitators of RTW for LOI claimants as experienced by health care workers (HCWs).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A qualitative explorative design included six healthcare workers who had worked with the MVA Fund on RTW for at least 5 years through purposive sampling. Data collection was done using a focus group discussion. Thematic analysis was conducted using Atlas.ti, with data interpretation guided by the ecological case management model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The main themes were healthcare systems, legislation and insurance systems, personal and workplace systems, which were further classified into eight subthemes relating to barriers and facilitators.Barriers included ineffective case management and how claimants perceived work. Facilitators included clear insurance RTW guidelines and workplace support and education level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Successful RTW can be achieved through multidisciplinary collaboration of HCWs. While legal and healthcare systems play vital roles in RTW, personal factors and workplace systems cannot be ignored.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>Understanding the barriers to and facilitators of RTW will assist in implementing RTW interventions to improve patient outcomes, health, livelihoods, quality of life and guide RTW operations to ensure a coordinated process in the insurance industry in Africa.</p>","PeriodicalId":45606,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Disability","volume":"14 ","pages":"1442"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12223908/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Disability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v14i0.1442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Road traffic accidents (RTAs) are a global and public health concern affecting a third of the world's population mainly in low- to middle-income countries, particularly affecting young people. Returning to work (RTW) following an RTA is essential for better health and financial outcomes. The motor vehicle accident (MVA) Fund Botswana assists loss-of-income (LOI) claimants with medical assistance, compensates for loss, advocates and facilitates RTW.

Objectives: The study aims to identify barriers to and facilitators of RTW for LOI claimants as experienced by health care workers (HCWs).

Method: A qualitative explorative design included six healthcare workers who had worked with the MVA Fund on RTW for at least 5 years through purposive sampling. Data collection was done using a focus group discussion. Thematic analysis was conducted using Atlas.ti, with data interpretation guided by the ecological case management model.

Results: The main themes were healthcare systems, legislation and insurance systems, personal and workplace systems, which were further classified into eight subthemes relating to barriers and facilitators.Barriers included ineffective case management and how claimants perceived work. Facilitators included clear insurance RTW guidelines and workplace support and education level.

Conclusion: Successful RTW can be achieved through multidisciplinary collaboration of HCWs. While legal and healthcare systems play vital roles in RTW, personal factors and workplace systems cannot be ignored.

Contribution: Understanding the barriers to and facilitators of RTW will assist in implementing RTW interventions to improve patient outcomes, health, livelihoods, quality of life and guide RTW operations to ensure a coordinated process in the insurance industry in Africa.

收入损失索赔人重返工作岗位的障碍和促进因素:保健工作者的观点。
背景:道路交通事故是一个全球性的公共卫生问题,影响到世界上三分之一的人口,主要是在低收入和中等收入国家,尤其影响到年轻人。在RTA之后重返工作岗位(RTW)对于改善健康和财务结果至关重要。博茨瓦纳机动车事故基金向收入损失索赔人提供医疗援助、赔偿损失、倡导和促进重新旅行。目的:本研究旨在确定卫生保健工作者(HCWs)所经历的LOI索赔人的RTW障碍和促进因素。方法:采用定性探索性设计,通过目的抽样,选取6名在MVA基金从事RTW工作至少5年的医护人员。数据收集是通过焦点小组讨论完成的。使用Atlas进行专题分析。以生态案例管理模式为指导的数据解释。结果:以医疗卫生制度、立法与保险制度、个人与工作场所制度为主题,进一步划分为与障碍和促进因素相关的8个子主题。障碍包括无效的案件管理和索赔人如何看待工作。促进因素包括明确的保险RTW指南、工作场所支持和教育水平。结论:通过医护人员的多学科合作,可以实现成功的RTW。虽然法律和卫生保健制度在RTW中发挥着至关重要的作用,但个人因素和工作场所制度也不容忽视。贡献:了解RTW的障碍和促进因素将有助于实施RTW干预措施,以改善患者的结果、健康、生计和生活质量,并指导RTW业务,以确保非洲保险业的协调进程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Journal of Disability
African Journal of Disability HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
50
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The African Journal of Disability, the official journal of CRS, AfriNEAD and CEDRES, introduce and discuss issues and experiences relating to and supporting the act of better understanding the interfaces between disability, poverty and practices of exclusion and marginalisation. Its articles yield new insight into established human development practices, evaluate new educational techniques and disability research, examine current cultural and social discrimination, and bring serious critical analysis to bear on problems shared across the African continent. Emphasis is on all aspects of disability particularity in the developing African context. This includes, amongst others: -disability studies as an emerging field of public health enquiry -rehabilitation, including vocational and community-based rehabilitation -community development and medical issues related to disability and poverty -disability-related stigma and discrimination -inclusive education -legal, policy, human rights and advocacy issues related to disability -the role of arts and media in relation to disability -disability as part of global Sustainable Development Goals transformation agendas -disability and postcolonial issues -globalisation and cultural change in relation to disability -environmental and climate-related issues linked to disability -disability, diversity and intersections of identity -disability and the promotion of human development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信