[Retrospective Analysis of Venetoclax Combined with Azacitidine Compared with "3+7" or Similar Regimens for Newly Diagnosed Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia].

Q4 Medicine
Lu-Lu Wang, Juan Zhang, Yue Zhang, Yong Zhang, Xiao-Min Dong, Dan-Yang Zhang, Ting-Ting Chen, Yun-Hui Zhou, Teng Wang, Hui-Ling Lan, He-Bing Zhou
{"title":"[Retrospective Analysis of Venetoclax Combined with Azacitidine Compared with \"3+7\" or Similar Regimens for Newly Diagnosed Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia].","authors":"Lu-Lu Wang, Juan Zhang, Yue Zhang, Yong Zhang, Xiao-Min Dong, Dan-Yang Zhang, Ting-Ting Chen, Yun-Hui Zhou, Teng Wang, Hui-Ling Lan, He-Bing Zhou","doi":"10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2025.03.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To retrospectively analyze the clinical data of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients treated with venetoclax combined with azacitidine (Ven/Aza) or standard \"3+7\" regimen and similar regimens, collect real-world study data, compare the treatment response and adverse events between the two regimens, as well as perform survival analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To retrospectively analyze the efficacy, survival, and adverse reactions of newly diagnosed AML patients treated with Ven/Aza (24 cases) and \"3+7\" regimens (117 cases ) in our hospital from September 2009 to March 2023, as well as factors influencing outcomes. A propensity score matching (PSM) was performed on age and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) to obtain a 1:1 matched cohort of 20 pairs, and the efficacy and survival before and after the matching were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of patients in the Ven/Aza group was 69 years, while that in the \"3+7\" group was 56 years (<i>P</i> <0.001). Objective remission rate (ORR) was 62.5% in Ven/Aza group and 74.8% in \"3+7\" group (<i>P</i> >0.05). The median overall survival (OS) in the Ven/Aza group was 522 days, while that in the \"3+7\" group was 1 002 days (<i>P</i> >0.05). After controlling the two variables of age and ECOG PS, a PSM cohort of 20 pairs was obtained, in which the ORR was 65% in Ven/Aza group and 60% in \"3+7\" group (<i>P</i> >0.05). The median OS was 522 days and 629 days, and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 531 days and 198 days between the two groups, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in OS and PFS between the two groups (both <i>P</i> >0.05). Additionally, the incidence of adverse events in the Ven/Aza group was significantly reduced.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The overall cohort shows that the \"3+7\" regimen has advantages in efficacy and survival, but Ven/Aza regimen is relatively safer. After performing PSM on age and ECOG PS, the Ven/Aza group showed improved efficacy, and a longer median PFS compared to \"3+7\" group.</p>","PeriodicalId":35777,"journal":{"name":"中国实验血液学杂志","volume":"33 3","pages":"672-681"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国实验血液学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2025.03.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To retrospectively analyze the clinical data of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients treated with venetoclax combined with azacitidine (Ven/Aza) or standard "3+7" regimen and similar regimens, collect real-world study data, compare the treatment response and adverse events between the two regimens, as well as perform survival analysis.

Methods: To retrospectively analyze the efficacy, survival, and adverse reactions of newly diagnosed AML patients treated with Ven/Aza (24 cases) and "3+7" regimens (117 cases ) in our hospital from September 2009 to March 2023, as well as factors influencing outcomes. A propensity score matching (PSM) was performed on age and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) to obtain a 1:1 matched cohort of 20 pairs, and the efficacy and survival before and after the matching were compared.

Results: The median age of patients in the Ven/Aza group was 69 years, while that in the "3+7" group was 56 years (P <0.001). Objective remission rate (ORR) was 62.5% in Ven/Aza group and 74.8% in "3+7" group (P >0.05). The median overall survival (OS) in the Ven/Aza group was 522 days, while that in the "3+7" group was 1 002 days (P >0.05). After controlling the two variables of age and ECOG PS, a PSM cohort of 20 pairs was obtained, in which the ORR was 65% in Ven/Aza group and 60% in "3+7" group (P >0.05). The median OS was 522 days and 629 days, and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 531 days and 198 days between the two groups, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in OS and PFS between the two groups (both P >0.05). Additionally, the incidence of adverse events in the Ven/Aza group was significantly reduced.

Conclusion: The overall cohort shows that the "3+7" regimen has advantages in efficacy and survival, but Ven/Aza regimen is relatively safer. After performing PSM on age and ECOG PS, the Ven/Aza group showed improved efficacy, and a longer median PFS compared to "3+7" group.

【Venetoclax联合阿扎胞苷治疗新诊断急性髓系白血病与“3+7”及类似方案比较的回顾性分析】。
目的:回顾性分析venetoclax联合阿扎胞苷(Ven/Aza)或标准“3+7”方案与类似方案治疗新诊断急性髓系白血病(AML)患者的临床资料,收集真实世界研究数据,比较两种方案的治疗反应和不良事件,并进行生存分析。方法:回顾性分析2009年9月至2023年3月我院新诊断AML患者采用Ven/Aza方案(24例)和“3+7”方案(117例)治疗的疗效、生存期、不良反应及影响结果的因素。对年龄和东部肿瘤合作组表现状态(ECOG PS)进行倾向评分匹配(PSM),得到20对1:1匹配的队列,比较匹配前后的疗效和生存率。结果:Ven/Aza组患者中位年龄为69岁,而“3+7”组患者中位年龄为56岁(P < 0.05)。Ven/Aza组的中位总生存期(OS)为522天,而“3+7”组的中位总生存期(OS)为1 002天(P < 0.05)。在控制年龄和ECOG PS两个变量后,得到20对PSM队列,其中Ven/Aza组的ORR为65%,“3+7”组的ORR为60% (P < 0.05)。两组患者的中位OS分别为522天和629天,中位无进展生存期(PFS)分别为531天和198天。两组患者的OS和PFS比较,差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。此外,Ven/Aza组的不良事件发生率显著降低。结论:整体队列研究显示,“3+7”方案在疗效和生存期方面具有优势,但Ven/Aza方案相对安全。在对年龄和ECOG PS进行PSM后,Ven/Aza组的疗效有所改善,与“3+7”组相比,中位PFS更长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国实验血液学杂志
中国实验血液学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7331
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信