Impairments and recovery of neurocognitive control and cardiac vagal regulation in males with substance use disorders

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Xin Li, Zhenhong Wang
{"title":"Impairments and recovery of neurocognitive control and cardiac vagal regulation in males with substance use disorders","authors":"Xin Li,&nbsp;Zhenhong Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.physbeh.2025.115012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous studies have indicated that neurocognitive control in people with substance use disorders (SUDs) tends to be impaired. Impaired cardiac vagal regulation may underlie the disrupted self-regulatory and emotional processes in people with SUDs. However, it is unclear whether both neurocognitive control (indexed by intraindividual reaction time variability, IIRTV) and cardiac vagal regulation (indexed by resting respiratory sinus arrhythmia, RSA) are impaired and whether they can recover after abstinence. This study examined whether both neurocognitive control and cardiac vagal regulation were impaired in males with SUDs, and particularly whether they could recover after abstinence. The present study compared participants’ IIRTV and resting RSA between healthy control group (<em>N</em> = 28), short-term abstinence group (<em>N</em> = 27), and long-term abstinence group (<em>N</em> = 31). The two-choice oddball task was used to measure IIRTV, and electrocardiogram (ECG) data was collected to obtain resting RSA. IIRTV of both healthy control and long-term abstinence groups were significantly lower than short-term abstinence group while there was no significant difference between the healthy control and long-term abstinence groups in IIRTV; resting RSA of healthy control group was significantly higher than both short-term and long-term abstinence groups while there was no significant difference between short-term and long-term abstinence groups in resting RSA. The findings indicated that neurocognitive control and cardiac vagal regulation were impaired in males with SUDs. Impaired IIRTV in males with SUDs might recover after long-term abstinence, however, the impaired resting RSA was unchanged despite almost 2 years of treatment in males with SUDs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20201,"journal":{"name":"Physiology & Behavior","volume":"300 ","pages":"Article 115012"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiology & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031938425002136","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have indicated that neurocognitive control in people with substance use disorders (SUDs) tends to be impaired. Impaired cardiac vagal regulation may underlie the disrupted self-regulatory and emotional processes in people with SUDs. However, it is unclear whether both neurocognitive control (indexed by intraindividual reaction time variability, IIRTV) and cardiac vagal regulation (indexed by resting respiratory sinus arrhythmia, RSA) are impaired and whether they can recover after abstinence. This study examined whether both neurocognitive control and cardiac vagal regulation were impaired in males with SUDs, and particularly whether they could recover after abstinence. The present study compared participants’ IIRTV and resting RSA between healthy control group (N = 28), short-term abstinence group (N = 27), and long-term abstinence group (N = 31). The two-choice oddball task was used to measure IIRTV, and electrocardiogram (ECG) data was collected to obtain resting RSA. IIRTV of both healthy control and long-term abstinence groups were significantly lower than short-term abstinence group while there was no significant difference between the healthy control and long-term abstinence groups in IIRTV; resting RSA of healthy control group was significantly higher than both short-term and long-term abstinence groups while there was no significant difference between short-term and long-term abstinence groups in resting RSA. The findings indicated that neurocognitive control and cardiac vagal regulation were impaired in males with SUDs. Impaired IIRTV in males with SUDs might recover after long-term abstinence, however, the impaired resting RSA was unchanged despite almost 2 years of treatment in males with SUDs.
男性物质使用障碍患者神经认知控制和心脏迷走神经调节功能的损害与恢复。
先前的研究表明,物质使用障碍(sud)患者的神经认知控制倾向于受损。心脏迷走神经调节受损可能是sud患者自我调节和情绪过程中断的基础。然而,目前尚不清楚神经认知控制(以个体内反应时间变异性(IIRTV)为指标)和心脏迷走神经调节(以静息性呼吸窦性心律失常(RSA)为指标)是否受损,以及它们是否能在戒断后恢复。这项研究检查了患有sud的男性的神经认知控制和心脏迷走神经调节是否受损,特别是他们是否可以在禁欲后恢复。本研究比较了健康对照组(N = 28)、短期戒断组(N = 27)和长期戒断组(N = 31)参与者的IIRTV和静息RSA。采用双选古怪任务测量IIRTV,并收集心电图(ECG)数据获得静息RSA。健康对照组和长期戒断组的IIRTV均显著低于短期戒断组,而健康对照组和长期戒断组的IIRTV差异无统计学意义;健康对照组的静息RSA显著高于短期和长期戒断组,而短期和长期戒断组的静息RSA无显著差异。研究结果表明,男性sud患者的神经认知控制和心脏迷走神经调节功能受损。男性sud患者的IIRTV受损可能会在长期禁欲后恢复,然而,尽管在男性sud患者中治疗了近2年,受损的静息RSA仍未改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiology & Behavior
Physiology & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
274
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Physiology & Behavior is aimed at the causal physiological mechanisms of behavior and its modulation by environmental factors. The journal invites original reports in the broad area of behavioral and cognitive neuroscience, in which at least one variable is physiological and the primary emphasis and theoretical context are behavioral. The range of subjects includes behavioral neuroendocrinology, psychoneuroimmunology, learning and memory, ingestion, social behavior, and studies related to the mechanisms of psychopathology. Contemporary reviews and theoretical articles are welcomed and the Editors invite such proposals from interested authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信