The effectiveness of physical activity in asthma management: An overview of systematic reviews.

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-07-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0325488
Wenrui Liu, Zhenzhen Feng, Shangyue Song, Siyuan Lei
{"title":"The effectiveness of physical activity in asthma management: An overview of systematic reviews.","authors":"Wenrui Liu, Zhenzhen Feng, Shangyue Song, Siyuan Lei","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0325488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical activity (PA) has become a promising complementary non-pharmacological intervention to improve exercise capacity, cardiopulmonary fitness, and quality of life in individuals with asthma. This overview systematically consolidates existing evidence to assess the clinical viability of physical activity as a scalable supplementary therapy for asthma management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched 12 electronic databases to identify systematic reviews (SRs) from inception until February 12, 2025, concerning the efficacy of physical activity in asthma management. Literature was independently reviewed, data extracted and verified by two researchers. A third author was designated to mediate any disputes concerning screening. The methodological quality of SRs was assessed using the A Measurement Tool to Assess SRs 2 (AMSTAR 2) checklist, and the certainty of evidence for key outcomes was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study analyzed 34 SRs (published 2000-2024) that included quantitative synthesis involving 113-2280 participants from asthma populations: adults (9 SRs), children (8 SRs), and mixed adult-child cohorts (17 SRs), with disease severity varying from mild to severe. Ten SRs were assessed as moderate to high quality by AMSTAR 2, whereas the other SRs were classified as low or very low quality. We evaluated the quality of evidence for SRs utilizing the GRADE evidence quality assessment framework. Thirteen moderate-quality evidence, and 51 low or very low-quality evidence support the improvement of PA on the outcomes of asthma quality of life, asthma control, lung function, exercise capacity, and respiratory muscle strength.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Engagement in physical activity has been demonstrated to markedly enhance asthma-related outcomes. Specific interventions provide targeted advantages in various domains: aerobic exercise enhances AQLQ scores and lung function metrics, including FEV1, FVC, PEF; breathing exercises improve AQLQ, FVC, and PImax; yoga correlates with enhancements in AQLQ, FEV1, and FVC; aquatic exercise results in increased FEV1; and inspiratory muscle training yields improvements in FEV1, FVC, PEF, and PImax. Nonetheless, there exists an imperative requirement for more stringent studies to fortify the existing evidence base. Furthermore, due to the significant individual variability among asthma patients, the creation of personalized exercise prescriptions is expected to produce enhanced clinical results.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 7","pages":"e0325488"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12225870/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325488","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physical activity (PA) has become a promising complementary non-pharmacological intervention to improve exercise capacity, cardiopulmonary fitness, and quality of life in individuals with asthma. This overview systematically consolidates existing evidence to assess the clinical viability of physical activity as a scalable supplementary therapy for asthma management.

Methods: We searched 12 electronic databases to identify systematic reviews (SRs) from inception until February 12, 2025, concerning the efficacy of physical activity in asthma management. Literature was independently reviewed, data extracted and verified by two researchers. A third author was designated to mediate any disputes concerning screening. The methodological quality of SRs was assessed using the A Measurement Tool to Assess SRs 2 (AMSTAR 2) checklist, and the certainty of evidence for key outcomes was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.

Results: This study analyzed 34 SRs (published 2000-2024) that included quantitative synthesis involving 113-2280 participants from asthma populations: adults (9 SRs), children (8 SRs), and mixed adult-child cohorts (17 SRs), with disease severity varying from mild to severe. Ten SRs were assessed as moderate to high quality by AMSTAR 2, whereas the other SRs were classified as low or very low quality. We evaluated the quality of evidence for SRs utilizing the GRADE evidence quality assessment framework. Thirteen moderate-quality evidence, and 51 low or very low-quality evidence support the improvement of PA on the outcomes of asthma quality of life, asthma control, lung function, exercise capacity, and respiratory muscle strength.

Conclusion: Engagement in physical activity has been demonstrated to markedly enhance asthma-related outcomes. Specific interventions provide targeted advantages in various domains: aerobic exercise enhances AQLQ scores and lung function metrics, including FEV1, FVC, PEF; breathing exercises improve AQLQ, FVC, and PImax; yoga correlates with enhancements in AQLQ, FEV1, and FVC; aquatic exercise results in increased FEV1; and inspiratory muscle training yields improvements in FEV1, FVC, PEF, and PImax. Nonetheless, there exists an imperative requirement for more stringent studies to fortify the existing evidence base. Furthermore, due to the significant individual variability among asthma patients, the creation of personalized exercise prescriptions is expected to produce enhanced clinical results.

体育活动在哮喘管理中的有效性:系统综述。
背景:体育活动(PA)已成为一种有希望的补充非药物干预措施,以提高哮喘患者的运动能力,心肺健康和生活质量。本综述系统地整合了现有证据,以评估身体活动作为哮喘管理的可扩展补充疗法的临床可行性。方法:我们检索了12个电子数据库,以确定从建立到2025年2月12日关于体育活动在哮喘管理中的疗效的系统评价(SRs)。文献是独立审查,数据提取和验证由两名研究人员。第三位作者被指定调解有关筛选的任何纠纷。使用评估SRs 2的测量工具(AMSTAR 2)检查表对SRs的方法学质量进行评估,并使用建议评估、发展和评估分级(GRADE)框架对关键结果的证据确定性进行评估。结果:本研究分析了34例SRs(发表于2000-2024年),包括定量合成,涉及113-2280名哮喘人群:成人(9例SRs)、儿童(8例SRs)和成人-儿童混合队列(17例SRs),疾病严重程度从轻度到重度不等。10个SRs被AMSTAR 2评估为中等到高质量,而其他SRs被归类为低质量或非常低质量。我们利用GRADE证据质量评估框架评估了SRs的证据质量。13个中等质量证据和51个低质量或极低质量证据支持PA对哮喘生活质量、哮喘控制、肺功能、运动能力和呼吸肌力量的改善。结论:参与体育活动已被证明可以显著提高哮喘相关的预后。具体的干预措施在各个领域提供了针对性的优势:有氧运动可提高AQLQ评分和肺功能指标,包括FEV1、FVC、PEF;呼吸练习可改善空气质量指数、肺活量和肺活量;瑜伽与AQLQ、FEV1和FVC的增强相关;水上运动导致FEV1增加;吸气肌训练可改善FEV1、FVC、PEF和PImax。然而,迫切需要更严格的研究来巩固现有的证据基础。此外,由于哮喘患者之间存在显著的个体差异,个性化运动处方的创建有望产生更好的临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信