Anxiety and depression screening across diverse populations: Testing measurement and structural invariance of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 across Black and White groups.

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
D Drew Whittington, Nicholas C Borgogna
{"title":"Anxiety and depression screening across diverse populations: Testing measurement and structural invariance of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 across Black and White groups.","authors":"D Drew Whittington, Nicholas C Borgogna","doi":"10.1037/pas0001407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 are two of the most commonly used measures of anxiety and depression in clinical practice and research. Although the measures are frequently used, little is known about their measurement invariance across diverse populations. Because both measures were originally developed and validated in largely White samples, it is necessary to ensure that the psychometric properties of the measures are similar across populations. In the present study, we use a national sample of college students from the Healthy Minds Study to examine the measurement and structural invariance of GAD-7 and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 in Black and White individuals (<i>n</i> = 4,669 for each group). Findings support the one-factor structure of each measure. Within-gender analyses suggested that Black males demonstrated residual invariance on both measures with White males. Black females demonstrated residual invariance on Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and metric invariance on GAD-7 with White females. Findings suggest that males will often score lower than females on each measure even when they have the same latent levels of depression and anxiety, and Black females will likely score lower than White females on GAD-7 even at the same latent levels of anxiety. The measures failed to demonstrate structural invariance with the correlation of latent anxiety and depression factors being significantly stronger in Black individuals. Findings highlight the need to weigh means to account for measurement bias of GAD-7 and for researchers and practitioners to carefully examine the scores of participants and patients when making inferences regarding inclusion in clinical research and the probable presence of diagnoses. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001407","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 are two of the most commonly used measures of anxiety and depression in clinical practice and research. Although the measures are frequently used, little is known about their measurement invariance across diverse populations. Because both measures were originally developed and validated in largely White samples, it is necessary to ensure that the psychometric properties of the measures are similar across populations. In the present study, we use a national sample of college students from the Healthy Minds Study to examine the measurement and structural invariance of GAD-7 and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 in Black and White individuals (n = 4,669 for each group). Findings support the one-factor structure of each measure. Within-gender analyses suggested that Black males demonstrated residual invariance on both measures with White males. Black females demonstrated residual invariance on Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and metric invariance on GAD-7 with White females. Findings suggest that males will often score lower than females on each measure even when they have the same latent levels of depression and anxiety, and Black females will likely score lower than White females on GAD-7 even at the same latent levels of anxiety. The measures failed to demonstrate structural invariance with the correlation of latent anxiety and depression factors being significantly stronger in Black individuals. Findings highlight the need to weigh means to account for measurement bias of GAD-7 and for researchers and practitioners to carefully examine the scores of participants and patients when making inferences regarding inclusion in clinical research and the probable presence of diagnoses. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

不同人群的焦虑和抑郁筛查:黑人和白人群体的广泛性焦虑障碍-7和患者健康问卷-9的测试、测量和结构不变性
广泛性焦虑障碍-7 (GAD-7)和患者健康问卷-9是临床实践和研究中最常用的两种焦虑和抑郁的测量方法。尽管这些测量方法经常被使用,但人们对它们在不同人群中的测量不变性知之甚少。由于这两种测量方法最初都是在大部分白人样本中开发和验证的,因此有必要确保测量方法的心理测量特性在人群中是相似的。在本研究中,我们使用来自健康心理研究的全国大学生样本来检验黑人和白人个体的GAD-7和患者健康问卷-9的测量和结构不变性(每组n = 4,669)。研究结果支持每个测量的单因素结构。性别内分析表明,黑人男性与白人男性在这两项指标上表现出剩余不变性。黑人女性在患者健康问卷-9上表现出残差不变性,白人女性在GAD-7上表现出度量不变性。研究结果表明,即使男性具有相同的潜在抑郁和焦虑水平,男性在每项测试中的得分也往往低于女性,即使在相同的潜在焦虑水平下,黑人女性在GAD-7上的得分也可能低于白人女性。这些测量没有显示出结构不变性,黑人个体的潜在焦虑和抑郁因素的相关性显著增强。研究结果强调需要权衡方法来解释GAD-7的测量偏差,研究人员和从业人员在对临床研究的纳入和诊断的可能存在进行推断时,需要仔细检查参与者和患者的分数。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Assessment
Psychological Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Psychological Assessment is concerned mainly with empirical research on measurement and evaluation relevant to the broad field of clinical psychology. Submissions are welcome in the areas of assessment processes and methods. Included are - clinical judgment and the application of decision-making models - paradigms derived from basic psychological research in cognition, personality–social psychology, and biological psychology - development, validation, and application of assessment instruments, observational methods, and interviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信