Factors affecting microbial safety behavior of beef handlers working in major beef retailers in Mizan-Aman, Southwest Ethiopia.

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-07-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0326862
Girma Mamo Zegene, Seid Tiku Mereta, Seblework Mekonen
{"title":"Factors affecting microbial safety behavior of beef handlers working in major beef retailers in Mizan-Aman, Southwest Ethiopia.","authors":"Girma Mamo Zegene, Seid Tiku Mereta, Seblework Mekonen","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0326862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Beef is a key component of human diet but also a favorable medium for microbial growth. However, research has largely overlooked major beef retailers and the specific roles of handlers, missing critical points for intervention. This study aims to address these gaps to support targeted microbial safety measures based on handlers' specific roles in beef processing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted in Mizan-Aman, Southwest Ethiopia, from February 20 to April 20, 2024. The sample size was determined using a single population proportion formula, resulting in the inclusion of 372 participants, yielding a response rate of 360 (96.8%). Beef retailers were randomly selected, while beef handlers were chosen through systematic sampling technique. Data collection was done using a structured questionnaire and observation checklist. Following a quality assessment, the data were analyzed using STATA 16, employing descriptive statistics and logistic regression. Bivariable analysis (p ≤ 0.25) was performed to identify variables for multivariable analysis. Statistical significance was assessed using adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), with a significance level set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings indicated that a significant proportion of beef handlers demonstrated inadequate knowledge (61%), negative attitudes (58%), and insufficient safety practices (55%). Among several factors associated with knowledge, attitude and practice of beef handlers, training in food safety was linked to good knowledge (AOR = 4.17, 95% CI: 1.15-15.12), while the role of a waiter was associated with both good knowledge (AOR = 4.5, 95% CI: 1.83-10.95), and more favorable attitudes (AOR = 2.8, 95% CI: 1.02-7.31). On the other hand, poor knowledge (AOR = 4.40, 95% CI: 2.44-7.94) and unfavorable attitudes (AOR = 4.84, 95% CI: 2.62-8.95) were significantly correlated with inadequate microbial safety practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many beef handlers lack sufficient knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding beef safety, regardless of their job roles. Improving microbial safety requires strategies such as formal education, training, health checks, and certification.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 7","pages":"e0326862"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12225834/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326862","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Beef is a key component of human diet but also a favorable medium for microbial growth. However, research has largely overlooked major beef retailers and the specific roles of handlers, missing critical points for intervention. This study aims to address these gaps to support targeted microbial safety measures based on handlers' specific roles in beef processing.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Mizan-Aman, Southwest Ethiopia, from February 20 to April 20, 2024. The sample size was determined using a single population proportion formula, resulting in the inclusion of 372 participants, yielding a response rate of 360 (96.8%). Beef retailers were randomly selected, while beef handlers were chosen through systematic sampling technique. Data collection was done using a structured questionnaire and observation checklist. Following a quality assessment, the data were analyzed using STATA 16, employing descriptive statistics and logistic regression. Bivariable analysis (p ≤ 0.25) was performed to identify variables for multivariable analysis. Statistical significance was assessed using adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), with a significance level set at p < 0.05.

Results: Findings indicated that a significant proportion of beef handlers demonstrated inadequate knowledge (61%), negative attitudes (58%), and insufficient safety practices (55%). Among several factors associated with knowledge, attitude and practice of beef handlers, training in food safety was linked to good knowledge (AOR = 4.17, 95% CI: 1.15-15.12), while the role of a waiter was associated with both good knowledge (AOR = 4.5, 95% CI: 1.83-10.95), and more favorable attitudes (AOR = 2.8, 95% CI: 1.02-7.31). On the other hand, poor knowledge (AOR = 4.40, 95% CI: 2.44-7.94) and unfavorable attitudes (AOR = 4.84, 95% CI: 2.62-8.95) were significantly correlated with inadequate microbial safety practices.

Conclusion: Many beef handlers lack sufficient knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding beef safety, regardless of their job roles. Improving microbial safety requires strategies such as formal education, training, health checks, and certification.

影响埃塞俄比亚西南部米赞-阿曼主要牛肉零售商牛肉处理人员微生物安全行为的因素。
背景:牛肉是人类饮食的重要组成部分,也是微生物生长的有利培养基。然而,研究在很大程度上忽视了主要的牛肉零售商和处理者的具体角色,错过了干预的关键点。本研究旨在解决这些差距,以支持基于处理者在牛肉加工中的特定角色的有针对性的微生物安全措施。方法:于2024年2月20日至4月20日在埃塞俄比亚西南部Mizan-Aman进行横断面研究。样本量采用单一总体比例公式确定,共纳入372名参与者,回复率为360(96.8%)。随机选择牛肉零售商,通过系统抽样技术选择牛肉处理者。数据收集采用结构化问卷和观察清单。在质量评估之后,使用STATA 16对数据进行分析,采用描述性统计和逻辑回归。采用双变量分析(p≤0.25)确定多变量分析的变量。使用调整优势比(AOR)和95%置信区间(CI)评估统计显著性,显著性水平设置为p。结果:研究结果表明,相当比例的牛肉处理者表现出知识不足(61%)、消极态度(58%)和安全措施不足(55%)。在与牛肉处理人员的知识、态度和实践相关的几个因素中,食品安全培训与良好的知识(AOR = 4.17, 95% CI: 1.15-15.12)有关,而服务员的角色与良好的知识(AOR = 4.5, 95% CI: 1.83-10.95)和更有利的态度(AOR = 2.8, 95% CI: 1.02-7.31)有关。另一方面,不良知识(AOR = 4.40, 95% CI: 2.44-7.94)和不良态度(AOR = 4.84, 95% CI: 2.62-8.95)与微生物安全实践不足显著相关。结论:无论他们的工作角色如何,许多牛肉处理人员缺乏足够的牛肉安全知识、态度和实践。改善微生物安全需要正规教育、培训、健康检查和认证等策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信