Measuring bioelectric impedance outputs following coffee consumption in healthy adults using an 8-electrode segmental BIA device.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Christopher Chamberlin, Aldo Lena, Dimple Radia, Dale Rees, John Lodge, James Rutherford, Bruno Cesar da Silva Dos Santos, Bhaven Patel, Shawn McLaren
{"title":"Measuring bioelectric impedance outputs following coffee consumption in healthy adults using an 8-electrode segmental BIA device.","authors":"Christopher Chamberlin, Aldo Lena, Dimple Radia, Dale Rees, John Lodge, James Rutherford, Bruno Cesar da Silva Dos Santos, Bhaven Patel, Shawn McLaren","doi":"10.1080/15502783.2025.2528531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) is increasingly used to measure body composition in athletic, clinical and research settings. The reliability of BIA measurements relies on following procedures carefully. However, some practices for ensuring reliable measures may be unnecessarily restrictive. Previous research using BIA outputs as study outcome measures, has required participants to avoid coffee and caffeine-containing foods and beverages prior to measurements. The aim of this study was to determine whether BIA outputs are affected by coffee consumption at different caffeine concentrations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a blinded, randomized, cross-over trial design. Participants (<i>n</i> = 13) received one of three treatments per visit: 200 mL hot water (80°C) mixed with 5 g instant coffee, 2.5 g instant coffee with 2.5 g decaffeinated coffee, or 5 g decaffeinated instant coffee. Body composition and fluid parameters were measured over 50 minutes using a Seca mBCA 515 device.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The treatment predictor (<i>p</i> > 0.05) and sex-time-treatment interaction for all outcomes was found to be non-significant (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The time predictor was statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05) for impedance, resistance and reactance but not for phase angle ϕ50 (<i>p</i> = 0.731), ϕ5 (<i>p</i> = 0.059) or urine osmolality (<i>p</i> = 0.066). The sex predictor was statistically significant for Z<sub>50</sub> (<i>p</i> = 0.001), Z<sub>5</sub> (<i>p</i> = 0.002), R<sub>50</sub> (<i>p</i> = 0.001), R<sub>5</sub> (<i>p</i> = 0.002), ϕ<sub>50</sub> (<i>p</i> = 0.01), ϕ<sub>5</sub> (<i>p</i> = 0.049), fat mass (%) (<i>p</i> = 0.016) and fat free mass (%) (<i>p</i> = 0.016). The effect size for this predictor was η<sup>2</sup><sub>G</sub> < 0.336. A significant sex-time interaction was found for Z<sub>50</sub> (<i>p</i> = 0.025) with a small effect size (η<sup>2</sup><sub>G</sub> < 0.01). Effect sizes for the treatment predictor and time-treatment interaction were found to be small (η<sup>2</sup><sub>G</sub> < 0.01). Effect size for the time predictor was small (η<sup>2</sup><sub>G</sub> > 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Changes in impedance, resistance and reactance were detected over the course of the experiment, and these changes were greater than could be explained by the technical error of measurement. However, the amount of caffeine in coffee did not affect BIA outputs. Effect sizes were small, suggesting little practical significance of drinking coffee before taking BIA measurements. Therefore, coaches, athletes, researchers and clinicians may be able to obtain reliable BIA measurements even when coffee has been consumed up to 50 minutes prior to measurements, however, fluid consumption and being adequately hydrated should still be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":17400,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition","volume":"22 1","pages":"2528531"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15502783.2025.2528531","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) is increasingly used to measure body composition in athletic, clinical and research settings. The reliability of BIA measurements relies on following procedures carefully. However, some practices for ensuring reliable measures may be unnecessarily restrictive. Previous research using BIA outputs as study outcome measures, has required participants to avoid coffee and caffeine-containing foods and beverages prior to measurements. The aim of this study was to determine whether BIA outputs are affected by coffee consumption at different caffeine concentrations.

Methods: This study used a blinded, randomized, cross-over trial design. Participants (n = 13) received one of three treatments per visit: 200 mL hot water (80°C) mixed with 5 g instant coffee, 2.5 g instant coffee with 2.5 g decaffeinated coffee, or 5 g decaffeinated instant coffee. Body composition and fluid parameters were measured over 50 minutes using a Seca mBCA 515 device.

Results: The treatment predictor (p > 0.05) and sex-time-treatment interaction for all outcomes was found to be non-significant (p > 0.05). The time predictor was statistically significant (p < 0.05) for impedance, resistance and reactance but not for phase angle ϕ50 (p = 0.731), ϕ5 (p = 0.059) or urine osmolality (p = 0.066). The sex predictor was statistically significant for Z50 (p = 0.001), Z5 (p = 0.002), R50 (p = 0.001), R5 (p = 0.002), ϕ50 (p = 0.01), ϕ5 (p = 0.049), fat mass (%) (p = 0.016) and fat free mass (%) (p = 0.016). The effect size for this predictor was η2G < 0.336. A significant sex-time interaction was found for Z50 (p = 0.025) with a small effect size (η2G < 0.01). Effect sizes for the treatment predictor and time-treatment interaction were found to be small (η2G < 0.01). Effect size for the time predictor was small (η2G > 0.01).

Conclusion: Changes in impedance, resistance and reactance were detected over the course of the experiment, and these changes were greater than could be explained by the technical error of measurement. However, the amount of caffeine in coffee did not affect BIA outputs. Effect sizes were small, suggesting little practical significance of drinking coffee before taking BIA measurements. Therefore, coaches, athletes, researchers and clinicians may be able to obtain reliable BIA measurements even when coffee has been consumed up to 50 minutes prior to measurements, however, fluid consumption and being adequately hydrated should still be considered.

使用8电极分段BIA装置测量健康成人饮用咖啡后的生物电阻抗输出。
生物阻抗分析(BIA)在运动、临床和研究中越来越多地用于测量身体成分。BIA测量的可靠性依赖于仔细遵循的程序。然而,一些确保可靠措施的做法可能具有不必要的限制性。先前的研究使用BIA输出作为研究结果测量,要求参与者在测量之前避免咖啡和含咖啡因的食物和饮料。本研究的目的是确定在不同咖啡因浓度下饮用咖啡是否会影响BIA的输出。方法:采用盲法、随机、交叉试验设计。参与者(n = 13)每次接受三种治疗中的一种:200毫升热水(80°C)与5克速溶咖啡混合,2.5克速溶咖啡与2.5克脱咖啡因咖啡混合,或5克脱咖啡因速溶咖啡。使用Seca mBCA 515装置在50分钟内测量身体成分和流体参数。结果:所有结果的治疗预测因子(p > 0.05)和性别-时间-治疗相互作用均无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。时间预测因子有统计学意义(p p = 0.731)、ϕ5 (p = 0.059)或尿渗透压(p = 0.066)。Z50性预测是统计学意义(p = 0.001), Z5 (p = 0.002), R50 (p = 0.001), R5 (p = 0.002),ϕ50 (p = 0.01),ϕ5 (p = 0.049),脂肪量(%)(p = 0.016)和无脂肪质量(%)(p = 0.016)。该预测因子的效应量为η2G 50 (p = 0.025),效应量较小(η2G 2G 2G > 0.01)。结论:在实验过程中检测到阻抗、电阻和电抗的变化,这些变化大于测量技术误差所能解释的变化。然而,咖啡中咖啡因的含量并不影响BIA的输出。效应量很小,表明在进行BIA测量之前喝咖啡的实际意义不大。因此,教练、运动员、研究人员和临床医生可能能够获得可靠的BIA测量,即使在测量前50分钟喝了咖啡,但是,液体消耗和充足的水分仍然应该被考虑在内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition NUTRITION & DIETETICS-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
3.90%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (JISSN) focuses on the acute and chronic effects of sports nutrition and supplementation strategies on body composition, physical performance and metabolism. JISSN is aimed at researchers and sport enthusiasts focused on delivering knowledge on exercise and nutrition on health, disease, rehabilitation, training, and performance. The journal provides a platform on which readers can determine nutritional strategies that may enhance exercise and/or training adaptations leading to improved health and performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信