{"title":"Relatively lower-intensity physical activity during leisure time and presenteeism among Japanese workers.","authors":"Koki Nagata, Shohei Yamamoto, Yosuke Inoue, Haruka Miyake, Hiroko Okazaki, Toshiaki Miyamoto, Takeshi Kochi, Isamu Kabe, Aki Tomizawa, Maki Konishi, Seitaro Dohi, Tetsuya Mizoue","doi":"10.1093/joccuh/uiaf037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examines the cross-sectional association between relatively lower-intensity physical activity (LIPA) during leisure time and presenteeism, accounting for relatively higher-intensity physical activity (HIPA) during leisure time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were derived from 11,438 workers from six worksites of large companies in Japan, which participated in a questionnaire survey conducted between fiscal years 2018-2020. Frequency and duration per occasion were assessed for leisure-time physical activities at three intensities as determined by shortness of breath. LIPA was defined as activity not causing shortness of breath. The participants were divided into three groups according to LIPA volume (none, < 60 minutes/week, or ≥ 60 minutes/week) and into two groups according to HIPA volume (none or engaged). A single question assessed the participants' presenteeism through self-ratings of their work performance. A multivariable Poisson regression model with a robust variance estimator estimated prevalence ratios (PRs) of presenteeism and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) across the categories for both LIPA and HIPA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of presenteeism tended to decrease with increasing amounts of LIPA and HIPA (P for trend < 0.001). Among those who did not engage in HIPA, a significantly lower prevalence of presenteeism was observed among individuals who engaged in LIPA for ≥ 60 minutes/week compared with those who did not (adjusted PR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.68-0.81).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study supports the protective role of LIPA during leisure time that does not cause shortness of breath against presenteeism among workers who do not engage in HIPA during leisure time.</p>","PeriodicalId":16632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiaf037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study examines the cross-sectional association between relatively lower-intensity physical activity (LIPA) during leisure time and presenteeism, accounting for relatively higher-intensity physical activity (HIPA) during leisure time.
Methods: Data were derived from 11,438 workers from six worksites of large companies in Japan, which participated in a questionnaire survey conducted between fiscal years 2018-2020. Frequency and duration per occasion were assessed for leisure-time physical activities at three intensities as determined by shortness of breath. LIPA was defined as activity not causing shortness of breath. The participants were divided into three groups according to LIPA volume (none, < 60 minutes/week, or ≥ 60 minutes/week) and into two groups according to HIPA volume (none or engaged). A single question assessed the participants' presenteeism through self-ratings of their work performance. A multivariable Poisson regression model with a robust variance estimator estimated prevalence ratios (PRs) of presenteeism and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) across the categories for both LIPA and HIPA.
Results: The prevalence of presenteeism tended to decrease with increasing amounts of LIPA and HIPA (P for trend < 0.001). Among those who did not engage in HIPA, a significantly lower prevalence of presenteeism was observed among individuals who engaged in LIPA for ≥ 60 minutes/week compared with those who did not (adjusted PR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.68-0.81).
Conclusions: This study supports the protective role of LIPA during leisure time that does not cause shortness of breath against presenteeism among workers who do not engage in HIPA during leisure time.
期刊介绍:
The scope of the journal is broad, covering toxicology, ergonomics, psychosocial factors and other relevant health issues of workers, with special emphasis on the current developments in occupational health. The JOH also accepts various methodologies that are relevant to investigation of occupational health risk factors and exposures, such as large-scale epidemiological studies, human studies employing biological techniques and fundamental experiments on animals, and also welcomes submissions concerning occupational health practices and related issues.