Effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery on Racial Inequalities in Prescribing Practices for Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Annabel Baek, Rachel Smith, Lesley B Coots, Emily S Andersen, Cindy Song, Hui Yu Juan, Sonia Lele, Paschalia M Mountziaris
{"title":"Effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery on Racial Inequalities in Prescribing Practices for Autologous Breast Reconstruction.","authors":"Annabel Baek, Rachel Smith, Lesley B Coots, Emily S Andersen, Cindy Song, Hui Yu Juan, Sonia Lele, Paschalia M Mountziaris","doi":"10.1055/a-2632-2565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have improved surgical outcomes and reduced narcotic needs. This study evaluated racial differences in our institution's opioid prescribing practices in autologous breast reconstruction before and after ERAS implementation.This was a retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction from 2013 to 2021, pre-ERAS and after ERAS implementation. Primary outcomes were morphine milligram equivalents (MME) for intravenous (IV) and oral (PO) narcotics peri- and postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included infection, delayed wound healing, and need for reoperation.Of 163 patients, 150 met inclusion criteria. The pre-ERAS group comprised 65 patients (35% Black, 65% White), and the ERAS group included 85 patients (44% Black, 54% White). Pre-ERAS, Black patients received more IV narcotics than White patients, 814 versus 505 MME (<i>p</i> < 0.05). There was no difference between inpatient and outpatient PO MME (<i>p ></i> 0.05). ERAS decreased IV MME 10-fold (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and decreased inpatient PO MME approximately 3-fold (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Nevertheless, racial differences existed in IV narcotics (80 vs. 58 MME; <i>p</i> <i><</i>0.05) and inpatient PO narcotics (93 vs. 59 MME; <i>p</i> < 0.05). Black race was a significant positive predictor in univariate and multivariate analyses for IV MME in both pre-ERAS and ERAS.Black patients unexpectedly received more IV narcotics pre-ERAS. Although ERAS decreased inpatient opioid administration, racial differences persisted; Black patients also received more PO narcotics, contrary to literature findings of systemic pain undertreatment. Standardized protocols alone may be inadequate to address complexities of postoperative pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2632-2565","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have improved surgical outcomes and reduced narcotic needs. This study evaluated racial differences in our institution's opioid prescribing practices in autologous breast reconstruction before and after ERAS implementation.This was a retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction from 2013 to 2021, pre-ERAS and after ERAS implementation. Primary outcomes were morphine milligram equivalents (MME) for intravenous (IV) and oral (PO) narcotics peri- and postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included infection, delayed wound healing, and need for reoperation.Of 163 patients, 150 met inclusion criteria. The pre-ERAS group comprised 65 patients (35% Black, 65% White), and the ERAS group included 85 patients (44% Black, 54% White). Pre-ERAS, Black patients received more IV narcotics than White patients, 814 versus 505 MME (p < 0.05). There was no difference between inpatient and outpatient PO MME (p > 0.05). ERAS decreased IV MME 10-fold (p < 0.05) and decreased inpatient PO MME approximately 3-fold (p < 0.05). Nevertheless, racial differences existed in IV narcotics (80 vs. 58 MME; p <0.05) and inpatient PO narcotics (93 vs. 59 MME; p < 0.05). Black race was a significant positive predictor in univariate and multivariate analyses for IV MME in both pre-ERAS and ERAS.Black patients unexpectedly received more IV narcotics pre-ERAS. Although ERAS decreased inpatient opioid administration, racial differences persisted; Black patients also received more PO narcotics, contrary to literature findings of systemic pain undertreatment. Standardized protocols alone may be inadequate to address complexities of postoperative pain.

自体乳房再造术中提高术后恢复对处方实践中种族不平等的影响。
增强术后恢复(ERAS)途径改善了手术效果,减少了麻醉需求。本研究评估了ERAS实施前后我院自体乳房重建中阿片类药物处方实践的种族差异。这是一项对2013年至2021年进行自体乳房重建的患者的回顾性研究,包括实施ERAS之前和之后。主要结局是围手术期和术后静脉注射(IV)和口服(PO)麻醉剂的吗啡毫克当量(MME)。次要结果包括感染、伤口愈合延迟和需要再次手术。163例患者中,150例符合纳入标准。ERAS前组包括65例患者(35%黑人,65%白人),ERAS组包括85例患者(44%黑人,54%白人)。在eras之前,黑人患者比白人患者接受了更多的静脉麻醉,814 MME比505 MME (p p > 0.05)。ERAS降低静脉注射MME 10倍(p p p 0.05),住院患者PO麻醉剂(93比59 MME;p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信