Evaluating the impact of cannabis oil for autistic children with and without concomitant medications: Insights from an open-label study.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nir Treves, Adi Dagan, Elkana Kohn, Ariela Hazan, Matityahu Berkovitch, Ibrahim Abu-Kishk, Netanel Agajani, Dana Barchel, Eli Heyman, Mirit Lazinger, Inbar Hartmann, Orit Stolar
{"title":"Evaluating the impact of cannabis oil for autistic children with and without concomitant medications: Insights from an open-label study.","authors":"Nir Treves, Adi Dagan, Elkana Kohn, Ariela Hazan, Matityahu Berkovitch, Ibrahim Abu-Kishk, Netanel Agajani, Dana Barchel, Eli Heyman, Mirit Lazinger, Inbar Hartmann, Orit Stolar","doi":"10.1177/02698811251332841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although only two drugs are FDA approved for autism spectrum disorder (ASD), clinical practice treatment includes off-label use of medications to address the troubling symptoms of ASD. Several trials showed the beneficial effects of medical cannabis for alleviating symptoms of ASD. However, data are lacking regarding its safety and effectiveness as a single agent compared to add-on therapy.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare the safety and effectiveness of medical cannabis as a monotherapy and add-on therapy in autistic children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An open-label trial recruiting autistic children was performed and treated with medical cannabis oil with a THC:CBD ratio of 1:20, respectively. Tests were conducted at baseline and after 6 months of therapy. A secondary analysis was done to compare physical and behavior parameters, using tests such as Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule and Wechsler tests in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 109 participants, 81 completed the treatment. Thirty received cannabis as add-on therapy to a pre-existing treatment, whereas 51 received cannabis as monotherapy, with no observed differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. The mean maximal CBD dose was 3.1 mg/kg/day in the monotherapy group, compared to 2.8 mg/kg/day in the add-on group (<i>p</i> = 0.40). In patients treated with drugs for psychosis, the mean maximal dose was 2.48 mg/kg/day (<i>p</i> = 0.12). No differences were observed in most physical and behavioral parameters. In addition, no differences in CBD blood levels were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Add-on cannabis therapy is as safe as monotherapy treatment, without significant differences in efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"2698811251332841"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811251332841","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although only two drugs are FDA approved for autism spectrum disorder (ASD), clinical practice treatment includes off-label use of medications to address the troubling symptoms of ASD. Several trials showed the beneficial effects of medical cannabis for alleviating symptoms of ASD. However, data are lacking regarding its safety and effectiveness as a single agent compared to add-on therapy.

Aims: To compare the safety and effectiveness of medical cannabis as a monotherapy and add-on therapy in autistic children.

Methods: An open-label trial recruiting autistic children was performed and treated with medical cannabis oil with a THC:CBD ratio of 1:20, respectively. Tests were conducted at baseline and after 6 months of therapy. A secondary analysis was done to compare physical and behavior parameters, using tests such as Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule and Wechsler tests in the two groups.

Results: Out of 109 participants, 81 completed the treatment. Thirty received cannabis as add-on therapy to a pre-existing treatment, whereas 51 received cannabis as monotherapy, with no observed differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. The mean maximal CBD dose was 3.1 mg/kg/day in the monotherapy group, compared to 2.8 mg/kg/day in the add-on group (p = 0.40). In patients treated with drugs for psychosis, the mean maximal dose was 2.48 mg/kg/day (p = 0.12). No differences were observed in most physical and behavioral parameters. In addition, no differences in CBD blood levels were observed.

Conclusions: Add-on cannabis therapy is as safe as monotherapy treatment, without significant differences in efficacy.

评估大麻油对有或没有伴随药物治疗的自闭症儿童的影响:来自一项开放标签研究的见解。
背景:虽然只有两种药物被FDA批准用于治疗自闭症谱系障碍(ASD),但临床实践治疗包括在说明书外使用药物来解决ASD的麻烦症状。几项试验表明,医用大麻对缓解自闭症谱系障碍的症状有有益作用。然而,与附加治疗相比,缺乏关于其作为单一药物的安全性和有效性的数据。目的:比较医用大麻作为一种单一疗法和附加疗法在自闭症儿童中的安全性和有效性。方法:进行开放标签试验,招募自闭症儿童,分别使用THC:CBD比例为1:20的医用大麻油治疗。在基线和治疗6个月后进行测试。第二次分析是比较身体和行为参数,在两组中使用自闭症诊断观察表和韦氏测试等测试。结果:109名参与者中,81人完成了治疗。30人接受大麻作为原有治疗的附加治疗,51人接受大麻作为单一治疗,两组之间的基线特征没有观察到差异。单药组的平均最大CBD剂量为3.1 mg/kg/天,而加药组为2.8 mg/kg/天(p = 0.40)。在接受精神病药物治疗的患者中,平均最大剂量为2.48 mg/kg/天(p = 0.12)。在大多数身体和行为参数上没有观察到差异。此外,没有观察到血液中CBD水平的差异。结论:大麻加药治疗与单药治疗一样安全,疗效无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Journal of Psychopharmacology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
126
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychopharmacology is a fully peer-reviewed, international journal that publishes original research and review articles on preclinical and clinical aspects of psychopharmacology. The journal provides an essential forum for researchers and practicing clinicians on the effects of drugs on animal and human behavior, and the mechanisms underlying these effects. The Journal of Psychopharmacology is truly international in scope and readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信