Cost-benefit analysis of a quadrivalent influenza vaccine in India.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Medical Economics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-15 DOI:10.1080/13696998.2025.2529722
Agam Vora, Mangesh Tiwaskar, Hrishikesh D Pai, Arun Jones, Kyoo Kim, Hansoo Kim
{"title":"Cost-benefit analysis of a quadrivalent influenza vaccine in India.","authors":"Agam Vora, Mangesh Tiwaskar, Hrishikesh D Pai, Arun Jones, Kyoo Kim, Hansoo Kim","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2025.2529722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In India, influenza presents a significant burden of disease to the population at large. Influenza vaccination is a cost-effective means of preventing the disease, with quadrivalent vaccines providing broader protection against influenza by covering more strains, but generally at a higher list price, than older trivalent vaccines.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Broadly, the economic burden of influenza can be categorized into treatment and productivity costs. We undertake a cost-benefit analysis to determine the cost-effectiveness of a quadrivalent influenza vaccine versus no vaccination amongst healthy adults and pregnant women from the perspective of both employers and the Employees' State Insurance Company (ESIC) in India.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Administration of the quadrivalent vaccine results in better outcomes in terms of productive days worked and disease infection rates amongst the target populations whilst incurring lower overall health resource utilization costs than when no vaccine is employed. In healthy adults, we estimate a saving of INR 13,730 per case averted from the corporate perspective and a saving of INR 11,211 from the ESIC perspective. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses indicate that there is a high probability that these results hold true given the uncertainty in our model's input parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We find that for healthy adults and pregnant women, receiving a quadrivalent influenza vaccine is dominant over no vaccination in terms of cost-effectiveness that is, it results in better health outcomes at a lower overall cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"1086-1095"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2529722","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In India, influenza presents a significant burden of disease to the population at large. Influenza vaccination is a cost-effective means of preventing the disease, with quadrivalent vaccines providing broader protection against influenza by covering more strains, but generally at a higher list price, than older trivalent vaccines.

Research design and methods: Broadly, the economic burden of influenza can be categorized into treatment and productivity costs. We undertake a cost-benefit analysis to determine the cost-effectiveness of a quadrivalent influenza vaccine versus no vaccination amongst healthy adults and pregnant women from the perspective of both employers and the Employees' State Insurance Company (ESIC) in India.

Results: Administration of the quadrivalent vaccine results in better outcomes in terms of productive days worked and disease infection rates amongst the target populations whilst incurring lower overall health resource utilization costs than when no vaccine is employed. In healthy adults, we estimate a saving of INR 13,730 per case averted from the corporate perspective and a saving of INR 11,211 from the ESIC perspective. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses indicate that there is a high probability that these results hold true given the uncertainty in our model's input parameters.

Conclusions: We find that for healthy adults and pregnant women, receiving a quadrivalent influenza vaccine is dominant over no vaccination in terms of cost-effectiveness that is, it results in better health outcomes at a lower overall cost.

印度四价流感疫苗的成本效益分析。
在印度,流感对广大人口构成了重大的疾病负担。流感疫苗接种是一种具有成本效益的疾病预防手段,四价疫苗通过覆盖更多毒株提供更广泛的流感保护,但通常比旧的三价疫苗定价更高。研究设计和方法从广义上讲,流感的经济负担可分为治疗成本和生产力成本。我们进行了一项成本效益分析,从印度雇主和雇员国家保险公司(ESIC)的角度确定健康成年人和孕妇接种四价流感疫苗与不接种流感疫苗的成本效益。结果:与不接种疫苗相比,接种四价疫苗在目标人群的工作日数和疾病感染率方面取得了更好的结果,同时产生了更低的总体卫生资源利用成本。在健康成人中,我们估计,从企业角度来看,每个病例可节省13,730印度卢比,从ESIC角度来看,可节省11,211印度卢比。确定性和概率敏感性分析表明,考虑到模型输入参数的不确定性,这些结果很有可能成立。我们发现,就成本效益而言,对于健康成人和孕妇而言,接种四价流感疫苗比不接种流感疫苗更具优势,即以较低的总成本获得更好的健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Economics
Journal of Medical Economics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication. Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信