A scoping review of authorisation pathway for COVID-19 vaccines among selected countries.

IF 3.3 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-07-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2025.2520861
Supapitch Suphap, Parnnaphat Luksameesate, Osot Nerapusee, Puree Anantachoti
{"title":"A scoping review of authorisation pathway for COVID<b>-</b>19 vaccines among selected countries.","authors":"Supapitch Suphap, Parnnaphat Luksameesate, Osot Nerapusee, Puree Anantachoti","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2025.2520861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In response to COVID-19 pandemic, NRAs implemented expedited mechanisms such as EUAs and CMAs, relying on international bodies, to authorize vaccines. Documenting these authorization pathways across countries informs NRAs and strengthens future pandemic responses. Existing studies on COVID-19 vaccine approvals are limited, underscoring the need for a comprehensive review. This study aimed to explore approval pathways, investigate supporting strategies, and review times for COVID-19 vaccines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted, covering countries with stringent regulatory authorities or countries with significant COVID-19 vaccine manufacturing or rapid rollout. Searches using terms such as 'approval process' and 'COVID-19 vaccine' were performed in electronic databases and on official regulatory authority websites. Countries without authorization information or with language barriers were excluded. Data on vaccine authorization processes including supporting strategies, submission criteria, and approval timelines were extracted and analyzed using content and comparative regulatory analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four regulatory pathways from 20 countries were identified, categorized as 'emergency use authorization' (EUA) (<i>n</i> = 10), 'conditional marketing authorization' (CMA) (<i>n</i> = 8), and \"temporary authorization' (TA) (<i>n</i> = 6). Twelve new pathways were created by 11 countries, with four countries using two pathways each for different pandemic stages. Common requirements for vaccine approval included good manufacturing practice (GMP) (92%), benefit-risk evaluation (86%), and unmet need (83%). Supporting strategies like 'rolling submission' (85%) and 'pre-submission meeting' (85%) facilitated and fasten the approval process. Non-high-income countries favored the 'reliance' strategy, while high-income countries engaged in regulatory networking. The FDA and EMA were the most referenced agencies. Review times for the first COVID-19 vaccines ranged from 10 to 84 days, significantly faster (3-27 times) than standard review times.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite different regulatory pathways, all countries approved the first COVID-19 vaccine quickly. International collaboration was crucial in accelerating approval times. The COVID-19 pandemic positively stimulated global preparedness for serious pandemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"18 1","pages":"2520861"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12224729/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2025.2520861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In response to COVID-19 pandemic, NRAs implemented expedited mechanisms such as EUAs and CMAs, relying on international bodies, to authorize vaccines. Documenting these authorization pathways across countries informs NRAs and strengthens future pandemic responses. Existing studies on COVID-19 vaccine approvals are limited, underscoring the need for a comprehensive review. This study aimed to explore approval pathways, investigate supporting strategies, and review times for COVID-19 vaccines.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted, covering countries with stringent regulatory authorities or countries with significant COVID-19 vaccine manufacturing or rapid rollout. Searches using terms such as 'approval process' and 'COVID-19 vaccine' were performed in electronic databases and on official regulatory authority websites. Countries without authorization information or with language barriers were excluded. Data on vaccine authorization processes including supporting strategies, submission criteria, and approval timelines were extracted and analyzed using content and comparative regulatory analysis.

Results: Twenty-four regulatory pathways from 20 countries were identified, categorized as 'emergency use authorization' (EUA) (n = 10), 'conditional marketing authorization' (CMA) (n = 8), and "temporary authorization' (TA) (n = 6). Twelve new pathways were created by 11 countries, with four countries using two pathways each for different pandemic stages. Common requirements for vaccine approval included good manufacturing practice (GMP) (92%), benefit-risk evaluation (86%), and unmet need (83%). Supporting strategies like 'rolling submission' (85%) and 'pre-submission meeting' (85%) facilitated and fasten the approval process. Non-high-income countries favored the 'reliance' strategy, while high-income countries engaged in regulatory networking. The FDA and EMA were the most referenced agencies. Review times for the first COVID-19 vaccines ranged from 10 to 84 days, significantly faster (3-27 times) than standard review times.

Conclusion: Despite different regulatory pathways, all countries approved the first COVID-19 vaccine quickly. International collaboration was crucial in accelerating approval times. The COVID-19 pandemic positively stimulated global preparedness for serious pandemics.

选定国家COVID-19疫苗授权途径的范围审查。
背景:为应对2019冠状病毒病大流行,国家疫苗管理局依靠国际机构实施了eua和cma等快速机制来批准疫苗。记录各国的这些授权途径可为国家应急机构提供信息,并加强未来的大流行应对。关于COVID-19疫苗批准的现有研究有限,这强调了全面审查的必要性。本研究旨在探索COVID-19疫苗的审批途径、支持策略和审查时间。方法:对具有严格监管机构的国家或具有重大COVID-19疫苗生产或快速推出的国家进行范围审查。使用“审批程序”和“COVID-19疫苗”等术语在电子数据库和官方监管机构网站上进行了搜索。没有授权信息或有语言障碍的国家被排除在外。利用内容分析和比较监管分析,提取并分析了有关疫苗批准程序的数据,包括支持策略、提交标准和批准时间表。结果:确定了来自20个国家的24条监管途径,分为“紧急使用许可”(EUA) (n = 10)、“有条件上市许可”(CMA) (n = 8)和“临时许可”(TA) (n = 6)。11个国家创建了12条新途径,其中4个国家针对大流行的不同阶段分别使用了两条途径。疫苗批准的常见要求包括良好生产规范(GMP)(92%)、获益-风险评估(86%)和未满足的需求(83%)。“滚动提交”(85%)和“提交前会议”(85%)等支持策略促进并加快了审批过程。非高收入国家倾向于“依赖”战略,而高收入国家则参与监管网络。FDA和EMA是被引用最多的机构。首批COVID-19疫苗的审查时间从10天到84天不等,明显快于标准审查时间(3-27次)。结论:尽管监管途径不同,但所有国家都迅速批准了首支COVID-19疫苗。国际合作对加快审批时间至关重要。2019冠状病毒病大流行积极促进了全球对严重流行病的防范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信