Does Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improve Gait Performances in Healthy Older Adults? A Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Beom Jin Choi, Hajun Lee, Nyeonju Kang
{"title":"Does Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improve Gait Performances in Healthy Older Adults? A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Beom Jin Choi, Hajun Lee, Nyeonju Kang","doi":"10.31083/JIN36636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aging can cause degenerative changes in motor and cognition-related brain areas, presumably by interfering with gait performance in healthy aging populations. We aimed to assess the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on single- and dual-task walking performances in healthy older adults using meta-analytic approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven studies were qualified based on the inclusion criteria: (a) healthy older adults, (b) treatment = tDCS protocols, (c) control = sham stimulation, (d) gait performance outcomes, and (e) randomized controlled trials using parallel or crossover designs. Effect sizes were estimated using standardized mean difference (SMD) to examine gait performances between active tDCS and sham stimulation. A separate random-effect meta-analysis was performed to determine the effects of tDCS protocols on gait performance during single- and dual-task walking tasks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During single-task walking, the random-effects meta-analysis showed improvements in stride time variability (<i>SMD</i> = 0.203; <i>p</i> = 0.005) and functional mobility (<i>SMD</i> = 0.595; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Moreover, single-task walking performances were improved when the tDCS protocols targeted the primary motor cortex (<i>SMD</i> = 0.424; <i>p</i> = 0.005) and used off-line stimulation (<i>SMD</i> = 0.168; <i>p</i> = 0.008). During dual-task walking, tDCS improved gait speed (<i>SMD</i> = 0.177; <i>p</i> = 0.025) and dual-task cost for gait speed (<i>SMD</i> = 0.548; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Dual-task walking performances were advanced when the tDCS protocols targeted the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (<i>SMD</i> = 0.231; <i>p</i> = 0.029) and multiple areas including prefrontal cortex (<i>SMD</i> = 0.382; <i>p</i> = 0.001), and applied off-line stimulation (<i>SMD</i> = 0.249; <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings indicate that the tDCS protocols may be a promising tool to support mobility and reduce gait-related challenges in the healthy aging population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of integrative neuroscience","volume":"24 6","pages":"36636"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of integrative neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/JIN36636","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Aging can cause degenerative changes in motor and cognition-related brain areas, presumably by interfering with gait performance in healthy aging populations. We aimed to assess the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on single- and dual-task walking performances in healthy older adults using meta-analytic approaches.

Methods: Eleven studies were qualified based on the inclusion criteria: (a) healthy older adults, (b) treatment = tDCS protocols, (c) control = sham stimulation, (d) gait performance outcomes, and (e) randomized controlled trials using parallel or crossover designs. Effect sizes were estimated using standardized mean difference (SMD) to examine gait performances between active tDCS and sham stimulation. A separate random-effect meta-analysis was performed to determine the effects of tDCS protocols on gait performance during single- and dual-task walking tasks.

Results: During single-task walking, the random-effects meta-analysis showed improvements in stride time variability (SMD = 0.203; p = 0.005) and functional mobility (SMD = 0.595; p < 0.001). Moreover, single-task walking performances were improved when the tDCS protocols targeted the primary motor cortex (SMD = 0.424; p = 0.005) and used off-line stimulation (SMD = 0.168; p = 0.008). During dual-task walking, tDCS improved gait speed (SMD = 0.177; p = 0.025) and dual-task cost for gait speed (SMD = 0.548; p < 0.001). Dual-task walking performances were advanced when the tDCS protocols targeted the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (SMD = 0.231; p = 0.029) and multiple areas including prefrontal cortex (SMD = 0.382; p = 0.001), and applied off-line stimulation (SMD = 0.249; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: These findings indicate that the tDCS protocols may be a promising tool to support mobility and reduce gait-related challenges in the healthy aging population.

经颅直流电刺激能改善健康老年人的步态表现吗?一个荟萃分析。
背景:衰老可引起运动和认知相关脑区域的退行性变化,可能是通过干扰健康老年人的步态表现。我们旨在利用meta分析方法评估经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对健康老年人单任务和双任务行走表现的影响。方法:根据纳入标准(a)健康老年人,(b)治疗= tDCS方案,(c)对照=假刺激,(d)步态表现结果,(e)采用平行或交叉设计的随机对照试验,对11项研究进行了筛选。使用标准化平均差(SMD)估计效应大小,以检查主动tDCS和假刺激之间的步态表现。进行了单独的随机效应荟萃分析,以确定tDCS方案对单任务和双任务行走任务中步态表现的影响。结果:在单任务行走中,随机效应荟萃分析显示步幅时间变异性有所改善(SMD = 0.203;p = 0.005)和功能活动性(SMD = 0.595;P < 0.001)。此外,当tDCS方案针对初级运动皮层时,单任务行走性能得到改善(SMD = 0.424;p = 0.005),采用离线增产(SMD = 0.168;P = 0.008)。双任务行走时,tDCS提高步态速度(SMD = 0.177;p = 0.025)和双任务成本的步态速度(SMD = 0.548;P < 0.001)。当tDCS方案针对背外侧前额叶皮层时(SMD = 0.231;p = 0.029)和包括前额皮质在内的多个区域(SMD = 0.382;p = 0.001),并应用离线增产(SMD = 0.249;P < 0.001)。结论:这些发现表明,tDCS方案可能是一个有前途的工具,以支持流动性和减少步态相关的挑战,在健康的老龄化人口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
173
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: JIN is an international peer-reviewed, open access journal. JIN publishes leading-edge research at the interface of theoretical and experimental neuroscience, focusing across hierarchical levels of brain organization to better understand how diverse functions are integrated. We encourage submissions from scientists of all specialties that relate to brain functioning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信