"We Should Not Call an Ambulance, Even If We are Very Sick": Ukrainian Refugee Women's Experiences in the United States Healthcare System.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Yana D Gepshtein, Jung-Ah Lee, Dawn T Bounds, Candace W Burton
{"title":"\"We Should Not Call an Ambulance, Even If We are Very Sick\": Ukrainian Refugee Women's Experiences in the United States Healthcare System.","authors":"Yana D Gepshtein, Jung-Ah Lee, Dawn T Bounds, Candace W Burton","doi":"10.1007/s10903-025-01710-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the number and diversity of refugees worldwide increases, healthcare providers working with these populations face unique challenges. Thus, healthcare providers in host countries have limited understanding of challenges refugees face when using healthcare in host countries. The goal of the study is to achieve an interpretive understanding of women refugees' perspectives on their interactions with healthcare systems and providers, as well as to identify factors and processes that women refugees view as enabling or hindering their access to healthcare. Study participants were refugee women from Ukraine in the US (N = 17), who volunteered to take part in semi-structured interviews about their experiences in the US healthcare. The interviews were transcribed in original languages and analyzed using Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory methodology, which is based on constant comparison between codes and data exemplars within and between interviews. Three priority theoretical elements were identified: (1) barriers to care, which encompassed codes: uncertainty about costs, lack of health insurance, time constraints, difficulties in communication, problems of distance and transportation, and finding a trustworthy provider; (2) systemic and organizational features that hinder care, which encompassed codes: the system is confusing, inconsistencies across organizations and providers; limited scope of organizations meant to help refugees; and (3) processes and factors that do or would alleviate impediments to care, which encompassed codes: clear and relevant information, getting help from others, addressing patients' concerns, acknowledging patient circumstances. The study emphasizes the importance of continuity of care in refugee health, indicates the culture-bound nature of trust in healthcare providers, and underscores the essential role of non-formal and non-structured support for refugees.</p>","PeriodicalId":15958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-025-01710-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the number and diversity of refugees worldwide increases, healthcare providers working with these populations face unique challenges. Thus, healthcare providers in host countries have limited understanding of challenges refugees face when using healthcare in host countries. The goal of the study is to achieve an interpretive understanding of women refugees' perspectives on their interactions with healthcare systems and providers, as well as to identify factors and processes that women refugees view as enabling or hindering their access to healthcare. Study participants were refugee women from Ukraine in the US (N = 17), who volunteered to take part in semi-structured interviews about their experiences in the US healthcare. The interviews were transcribed in original languages and analyzed using Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory methodology, which is based on constant comparison between codes and data exemplars within and between interviews. Three priority theoretical elements were identified: (1) barriers to care, which encompassed codes: uncertainty about costs, lack of health insurance, time constraints, difficulties in communication, problems of distance and transportation, and finding a trustworthy provider; (2) systemic and organizational features that hinder care, which encompassed codes: the system is confusing, inconsistencies across organizations and providers; limited scope of organizations meant to help refugees; and (3) processes and factors that do or would alleviate impediments to care, which encompassed codes: clear and relevant information, getting help from others, addressing patients' concerns, acknowledging patient circumstances. The study emphasizes the importance of continuity of care in refugee health, indicates the culture-bound nature of trust in healthcare providers, and underscores the essential role of non-formal and non-structured support for refugees.

“我们不应该叫救护车,即使我们病得很重”:乌克兰难民妇女在美国医疗保健系统的经历。
随着世界各地难民人数和多样性的增加,为这些人群提供服务的医疗保健提供者面临着独特的挑战。因此,东道国的卫生保健提供者对难民在东道国使用卫生保健服务时面临的挑战了解有限。这项研究的目标是对妇女难民对她们与保健系统和提供者的相互作用的看法作出解释性的理解,并确定妇女难民认为有助于或阻碍她们获得保健的因素和过程。研究参与者是来自美国的乌克兰难民妇女(N = 17),她们自愿参加关于她们在美国医疗保健方面经历的半结构化访谈。访谈以原始语言转录,并使用Charmaz的建构主义扎根理论方法进行分析,该方法基于访谈内部和访谈之间代码和数据范例之间的不断比较。确定了三个优先的理论要素:(1)保健障碍,其中包括代码:费用的不确定性、缺乏健康保险、时间限制、沟通困难、距离和交通问题以及寻找值得信赖的提供者;(2)阻碍护理的系统和组织特征,包括代码:系统令人困惑,各组织和提供者之间不一致;帮助难民的组织范围有限;(3)减轻或将减轻护理障碍的过程和因素,包括代码:明确和相关的信息,从他人那里获得帮助,解决患者的担忧,承认患者的情况。该研究强调了难民保健护理的连续性的重要性,表明对保健提供者的信任具有文化上的局限性,并强调了对难民的非正式和非结构化支助的重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
104
期刊介绍: Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original research pertaining to immigrant health from contributors in many diverse fields including public health, epidemiology, medicine and nursing, anthropology, sociology, population research, immigration law, and ethics. The journal also publishes review articles, short communications, letters to the editor, and notes from the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信