Frequency-specific neuromuscular adaptations: comparative effects of high- and low-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation on muscle function and quality.

IF 1.2 Q3 REHABILITATION
Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-06-25 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.12965/jer.2550222.111
Hyeon-Deok Jo, Maeng-Kyu Kim
{"title":"Frequency-specific neuromuscular adaptations: comparative effects of high- and low-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation on muscle function and quality.","authors":"Hyeon-Deok Jo, Maeng-Kyu Kim","doi":"10.12965/jer.2550222.111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the frequency-specific effects of high- and low-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on neuromuscular function and muscle quality. Sixteen healthy young males were randomly assigned to either a high-frequency stimulation group (HFES, 100 Hz; n=8) or a low-frequency stimulation group (LFES, 50 Hz; n=8) for 6 weeks of NMES intervention. Neuromuscular function was assessed using maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), while muscle quality of the rectus femoris (RF) and vastus lateralis (VL) was evaluated via ultrasound echo intensity (EI). Assessments were taken at baseline, midintervention (week 3), and postintervention (weeks 6, 8 and 10). HFES significantly increased MVIC during the intervention, indicating an immediate neuromuscular improvement. In contrast, LFES showed delayed effects, with significant EI improvements in RF and VL emerging only after the intervention ended. Statistical analysis revealed a significant interaction effect between time and intervention for MVIC and EI, highlighting the frequency-dependent nature of NMES adaptations. These results suggest that NMES induces neuromuscular adaptations in healthy adult males, with HFES promoting immediate gains and LFES leading to delayed benefits. Thus, frequency selection is critical in designing effective NMES protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":15771,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation","volume":"21 3","pages":"151-158"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12214954/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12965/jer.2550222.111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the frequency-specific effects of high- and low-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on neuromuscular function and muscle quality. Sixteen healthy young males were randomly assigned to either a high-frequency stimulation group (HFES, 100 Hz; n=8) or a low-frequency stimulation group (LFES, 50 Hz; n=8) for 6 weeks of NMES intervention. Neuromuscular function was assessed using maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), while muscle quality of the rectus femoris (RF) and vastus lateralis (VL) was evaluated via ultrasound echo intensity (EI). Assessments were taken at baseline, midintervention (week 3), and postintervention (weeks 6, 8 and 10). HFES significantly increased MVIC during the intervention, indicating an immediate neuromuscular improvement. In contrast, LFES showed delayed effects, with significant EI improvements in RF and VL emerging only after the intervention ended. Statistical analysis revealed a significant interaction effect between time and intervention for MVIC and EI, highlighting the frequency-dependent nature of NMES adaptations. These results suggest that NMES induces neuromuscular adaptations in healthy adult males, with HFES promoting immediate gains and LFES leading to delayed benefits. Thus, frequency selection is critical in designing effective NMES protocols.

频率特异性神经肌肉适应:高频和低频神经肌肉电刺激对肌肉功能和质量的比较影响。
本研究探讨了高频和低频神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)对神经肌肉功能和肌肉质量的频率特异性影响。16名健康的年轻男性被随机分配到高频刺激组(HFES, 100 Hz;n=8)或低频刺激组(LFES, 50 Hz;n=8)进行6周的NMES干预。神经肌肉功能通过最大自愿等距收缩(MVIC)评估,而股直肌(RF)和股外侧肌(VL)的肌肉质量通过超声回波强度(EI)评估。在基线、干预中期(第3周)和干预后(第6、8和10周)进行评估。在干预期间,HFES显著增加了MVIC,表明神经肌肉立即得到改善。相比之下,LFES表现出延迟效应,RF和VL的显著EI改善仅在干预结束后才出现。统计分析显示,MVIC和EI在时间和干预之间存在显著的交互作用,突出了NMES适应的频率依赖性。这些结果表明,NMES诱导健康成年男性的神经肌肉适应,hfe促进即时收益,而lfe导致延迟收益。因此,频率选择对于设计有效的NMES协议至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
45
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation is the official journal of the Korean Society of Exercise Rehabilitation, and is published six times a year. Supplementary issues may be published. Its official abbreviation is "J Exerc Rehabil". It was launched in 2005. The title of the first volume was Journal of the Korean Society of Exercise Rehabilitation (pISSN 1976-6319). The journal title was changed to Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation from Volume 9 Number 2, 2013. The effects of exercise rehabilitation are very broad and in some cases exercise rehabilitation has different treatment areas than traditional rehabilitation. Exercise rehabilitation can be presented as a solution to new diseases in modern society and it can replace traditional medicine in economically disadvantaged areas. Exercise rehabilitation is very effective in overcoming metabolic diseases and also has no side effects. Furthermore, exercise rehabilitation shows new possibility for neuropsychiatric diseases, such as depression, autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, schizophrenia, etc. The purpose of the Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation is to identify the effects of exercise rehabilitation on a variety of diseases and to identify mechanisms for exercise rehabilitation treatment. The Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation aims to serve as an intermediary for objective and scientific validation on the effects of exercise rehabilitation worldwide. The types of manuscripts include research articles, review articles, and articles invited by the Editorial Board. The Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation contains 6 sections: Basic research on exercise rehabilitation, Clinical research on exercise rehabilitation, Exercise rehabilitation pedagogy, Exercise rehabilitation education, Exercise rehabilitation psychology, and Exercise rehabilitation welfare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信