Efficacy and safety of vertebroplasty versus posterior pedicle screw in treating stage III Kummell's disease without neurological deficits: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of International Medical Research Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-04 DOI:10.1177/03000605251353732
Binbin Tang, Shengjia Hu, Yifeng Yuan, Hang Zhou, Xiaolin Shi
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of vertebroplasty versus posterior pedicle screw in treating stage III Kummell's disease without neurological deficits: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Binbin Tang, Shengjia Hu, Yifeng Yuan, Hang Zhou, Xiaolin Shi","doi":"10.1177/03000605251353732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vertebroplasty versus posterior pedicle screw fixation combined with vertebroplasty in treating stage III Kummell's disease without neurological deficits.MethodA systematic literature search was conducted across six databases. A meta-analysis of prospective and retrospective studies meeting the inclusion criteria was conducted using Review Manager 5.4.1.ResultsEight studies (one prospective, one randomized control trial, and six retrospective) involving 409 patients were included. Vertebroplasty demonstrated advantages over posterior pedicle screw + vertebroplasty in operative time (weighted mean difference: -83.22 min; 95% confidence interval: -97.70 to -68.73; p<i> </i><<i> </i>0.05), blood loss (weighted mean difference: -158.65 mL; 95% confidence interval: -219.99 to -97.31; p<i> </i><<i> </i>0.05), and hospital stay (weighted mean difference: -5.64 days; 95% confidence interval: -7.36 to -3.92; p<i> </i><<i> </i>0.05). No significant differences were observed in Cobb's angle (weighted mean difference: 1.28°; 95% confidence interval: -0.21 to 2.78; p<i> </i>><i> </i>0.05), relative anterior vertebral height (weighted mean difference: 2.98%; 95% confidence interval: -4.15 to 10.11; p<i> </i>><i> </i>0.05), cement leakage (13.2% vs. 8.5%; odds ratios: 1.67; 95% confidence interval: 0.86-3.24; p<i> </i>><i> </i>0.05), or wound infection (0% vs. 4.88%; odds ratios: 0.28; 95% confidence interval: 0.07-1.15; p<i> </i>><i> </i>0.05).ConclusionBoth vertebroplasty and posterior pedicle screw + vertebroplasty are effective for treating stage III Kummell's disease without neurological deficits. Vertebroplasty offers superior perioperative outcomes with reduced surgical trauma and hospital stay.PROSPERO registration number: CRD420251031065.</p>","PeriodicalId":16129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Medical Research","volume":"53 7","pages":"3000605251353732"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12227935/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605251353732","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vertebroplasty versus posterior pedicle screw fixation combined with vertebroplasty in treating stage III Kummell's disease without neurological deficits.MethodA systematic literature search was conducted across six databases. A meta-analysis of prospective and retrospective studies meeting the inclusion criteria was conducted using Review Manager 5.4.1.ResultsEight studies (one prospective, one randomized control trial, and six retrospective) involving 409 patients were included. Vertebroplasty demonstrated advantages over posterior pedicle screw + vertebroplasty in operative time (weighted mean difference: -83.22 min; 95% confidence interval: -97.70 to -68.73; p<0.05), blood loss (weighted mean difference: -158.65 mL; 95% confidence interval: -219.99 to -97.31; p<0.05), and hospital stay (weighted mean difference: -5.64 days; 95% confidence interval: -7.36 to -3.92; p<0.05). No significant differences were observed in Cobb's angle (weighted mean difference: 1.28°; 95% confidence interval: -0.21 to 2.78; p>0.05), relative anterior vertebral height (weighted mean difference: 2.98%; 95% confidence interval: -4.15 to 10.11; p>0.05), cement leakage (13.2% vs. 8.5%; odds ratios: 1.67; 95% confidence interval: 0.86-3.24; p>0.05), or wound infection (0% vs. 4.88%; odds ratios: 0.28; 95% confidence interval: 0.07-1.15; p>0.05).ConclusionBoth vertebroplasty and posterior pedicle screw + vertebroplasty are effective for treating stage III Kummell's disease without neurological deficits. Vertebroplasty offers superior perioperative outcomes with reduced surgical trauma and hospital stay.PROSPERO registration number: CRD420251031065.

椎体成形术与后路椎弓根螺钉治疗无神经功能缺损的III期Kummell病的疗效和安全性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的评价椎体成形术与后路椎弓根螺钉固定联合椎体成形术治疗无神经功能缺损的III期Kummell病的疗效和安全性。方法对6个数据库进行系统的文献检索。使用Review Manager 5.4.1对符合纳入标准的前瞻性和回顾性研究进行meta分析。结果共纳入8项研究(1项前瞻性研究、1项随机对照研究和6项回顾性研究),共409例患者。椎体成形术在手术时间上优于后路椎弓根螺钉+椎体成形术(加权平均差:-83.22分钟;95%置信区间:-97.70 ~ -68.73;p 0.05),失血量(加权平均差:-158.65 mL;95%置信区间:-219.99 ~ -97.31;P 0.05),住院时间(加权平均差值:-5.64天;95%置信区间:-7.36 ~ -3.92;p 0.05)。Cobb角(加权平均差:1.28°;95%置信区间:-0.21 ~ 2.78;P < 0.05),相对前椎体高度(加权平均差:2.98%;95%置信区间:-4.15至10.11;P < 0.05),水泥渗漏(13.2% vs. 8.5%;优势比:1.67;95%置信区间:0.86-3.24;P < 0.05)或伤口感染(0% vs. 4.88%;优势比:0.28;95%置信区间:0.07-1.15;p > 0.05)。结论椎体成形术和后路椎弓根螺钉+椎体成形术是治疗无神经功能缺损的III期Kummell病的有效方法。椎体成形术提供了良好的围手术期结果,减少了手术创伤和住院时间。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD420251031065。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: _Journal of International Medical Research_ is a leading international journal for rapid publication of original medical, pre-clinical and clinical research, reviews, preliminary and pilot studies on a page charge basis. As a service to authors, every article accepted by peer review will be given a full technical edit to make papers as accessible and readable to the international medical community as rapidly as possible. Once the technical edit queries have been answered to the satisfaction of the journal, the paper will be published and made available freely to everyone under a creative commons licence. Symposium proceedings, summaries of presentations or collections of medical, pre-clinical or clinical data on a specific topic are welcome for publication as supplements. Print ISSN: 0300-0605
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信