Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT with CECT in the evaluation of peritoneal metastases from gastrointestinal cancers and impact on clinical decision-making.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Yushan Zhou, Yaqin Zhao, Dandan Shuai, Xibiao Yang, Qiancheng Hu, Xiangbing Deng, Qianrui Li, Minggang Su
{"title":"Comparison of <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT with CECT in the evaluation of peritoneal metastases from gastrointestinal cancers and impact on clinical decision-making.","authors":"Yushan Zhou, Yaqin Zhao, Dandan Shuai, Xibiao Yang, Qiancheng Hu, Xiangbing Deng, Qianrui Li, Minggang Su","doi":"10.1007/s00432-025-06237-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT for peritoneal metastasis in gastrointestinal cancers and to assess its impact on clinical decision-making, comparing to contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively included consecutive patients with gastrointestinal cancers, admitted between April 2022 and October 2022, and underwent both <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and CECT within two weeks. The reference standard was histopathology or imaging follow-up. We compared patient-level accuracy to detect peritoneal metastases and to measure peritoneal tumor burden between <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and CECT. We assessed the impact of <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT on treatment through a simulated multidisciplinary tumor board.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 57 patients, among which, 34 (59.65%) had peritoneal metastasis. <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT showed superior sensitivity (97.06% vs. 64.71%) and specificity (95.65% vs. 78.26%) than CECT, as well as area under the curve (0.964 vs. 0.715, P < 0.001). Among patients with peritoneal metastasis, <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT revealed higher peritoneal tumor burden than CECT (peritoneal cancer index [PCI]-region: 6.5 vs. 1, P < 0.001). <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT findings led to changes of treatment in 17 (29.82%) patients, among which, nine (15.8%) patients had new findings related to peritoneum. The impact was deemed high in 10 (17.54%) patients, moderate in six (10.53%), and low in one (1.75%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong><sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT has the potential to influence clinical decision-making in gastrointestinal cancers and has superior accuracy than CECT. Further studies are warranted to support routine use.</p>","PeriodicalId":15118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","volume":"151 7","pages":"201"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12226647/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-025-06237-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT for peritoneal metastasis in gastrointestinal cancers and to assess its impact on clinical decision-making, comparing to contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT).

Methods: We retrospectively included consecutive patients with gastrointestinal cancers, admitted between April 2022 and October 2022, and underwent both 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and CECT within two weeks. The reference standard was histopathology or imaging follow-up. We compared patient-level accuracy to detect peritoneal metastases and to measure peritoneal tumor burden between 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and CECT. We assessed the impact of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT on treatment through a simulated multidisciplinary tumor board.

Results: We included 57 patients, among which, 34 (59.65%) had peritoneal metastasis. 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT showed superior sensitivity (97.06% vs. 64.71%) and specificity (95.65% vs. 78.26%) than CECT, as well as area under the curve (0.964 vs. 0.715, P < 0.001). Among patients with peritoneal metastasis, 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT revealed higher peritoneal tumor burden than CECT (peritoneal cancer index [PCI]-region: 6.5 vs. 1, P < 0.001). 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT findings led to changes of treatment in 17 (29.82%) patients, among which, nine (15.8%) patients had new findings related to peritoneum. The impact was deemed high in 10 (17.54%) patients, moderate in six (10.53%), and low in one (1.75%).

Conclusions: 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT has the potential to influence clinical decision-making in gastrointestinal cancers and has superior accuracy than CECT. Further studies are warranted to support routine use.

68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT与CECT评估胃肠道肿瘤腹膜转移的比较及对临床决策的影响
目的:探讨68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT对胃肠道肿瘤腹膜转移的诊断准确性,并与对比增强计算机断层扫描(CECT)进行比较,评估其对临床决策的影响。方法:我们回顾性地纳入了2022年4月至2022年10月期间入院的连续胃肠道癌症患者,并在两周内接受了68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT和CECT。参照标准为组织病理学或影像学随访。我们比较了68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT和CECT在检测腹膜转移和测量腹膜肿瘤负荷方面的患者水平准确性。我们通过模拟多学科肿瘤委员会评估68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT对治疗的影响。结果:我们纳入57例患者,其中34例(59.65%)发生腹膜转移。68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT的敏感性(97.06% vs. 64.71%)和特异性(95.65% vs. 78.26%)均优于CECT,曲线下面积(0.964 vs. 0.715), p68ga - fapi -04 PET/CT显示腹膜肿瘤负荷高于CECT(腹膜癌指数[PCI]-区域:6.5 vs. 1), p68ga - fapi -04 PET/CT结果导致17例(29.82%)患者改变治疗,其中9例(15.8%)患者有腹膜相关新发现。其中,高影响10例(17.54%),中等影响6例(10.53%),低影响1例(1.75%)。结论:68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT具有影响胃肠道肿瘤临床决策的潜力,且准确性优于CECT。需要进一步的研究来支持常规使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
577
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The "Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology" publishes significant and up-to-date articles within the fields of experimental and clinical oncology. The journal, which is chiefly devoted to Original papers, also includes Reviews as well as Editorials and Guest editorials on current, controversial topics. The section Letters to the editors provides a forum for a rapid exchange of comments and information concerning previously published papers and topics of current interest. Meeting reports provide current information on the latest results presented at important congresses. The following fields are covered: carcinogenesis - etiology, mechanisms; molecular biology; recent developments in tumor therapy; general diagnosis; laboratory diagnosis; diagnostic and experimental pathology; oncologic surgery; and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信