Inhaled nitric oxide therapy in preterm infants born before 34 weeks of gestation: a nationwide multicenter study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Rui-Hua Ba, Lian Wang, Sheng-Qian Huang, Bao-Ying Feng, Mu-Lin Yao, Jing Zhang, Yao Zhu, Guo-Bao Liang, Zhi Zheng, Ling Liu, Qiu-Fen Wei, Li Ma, Jian Mao, Xin-Zhu Lin
{"title":"Inhaled nitric oxide therapy in preterm infants born before 34 weeks of gestation: a nationwide multicenter study.","authors":"Rui-Hua Ba, Lian Wang, Sheng-Qian Huang, Bao-Ying Feng, Mu-Lin Yao, Jing Zhang, Yao Zhu, Guo-Bao Liang, Zhi Zheng, Ling Liu, Qiu-Fen Wei, Li Ma, Jian Mao, Xin-Zhu Lin","doi":"10.1186/s13052-025-02035-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the lack of consensus, the use of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) in preterm infants with a gestational age (GA) of less than 34 weeks has been increasing in recent years. At present, there are no multi-center studies in China on the use of iNO in this population. This study aims to investigate the use of iNO in preterm infants under 34 weeks of gestation over the past 10 years in China, and provides evidence-based medical proof for the use of iNO in these neonates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a retrospective study method, clinical data were collected from infants with a GA of less than 34 weeks who received iNO therapy in the neonatal units of five tertiary hospitals in China from January 2013 to December 2022. The infants were divided into two groups: Group A (2013-2017) and Group B (2018-2022). The differences in clinical characteristics, iNO use, and short-term outcomes between the two groups were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the past decade, the use of iNO in preterm infants with a GA of less than 34 weeks has increased gradually, with a more pronounced rise in its use among preterm infants born at 24-27 weeks. The proportion of infants receiving iNO therapy has increased from 1.23% (Group A) to 2.62% (Group B). Compared to Group A, the infants in Group B who received iNO therapy had a smaller GA and lower birth weight. The initial and maximum doses of iNO in Group B were higher (10.0 ppm vs. 8.0 ppm, 15.0 ppm vs. 9.0 ppm). More than half of the extremely preterm infants (EPI) and extremely low birth weight infants (ELBWI) died in both groups. In preterm infants with a GA of 32-33 weeks who were treated with iNO, the case fatality rate was significantly lower in Group B compared to Group A (9.1% vs. 28.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of iNO in preterm infants with a GA of < 34 weeks has increased over the past 10 years. The treatment strategy for iNO has become more aggressive, and the observed reduction in mortality among relatively older preterm infants (32-33 weeks GA) may be linked to increased iNO utilization and higher dosing regimens. Notably, the case fatality rate among EPI and ELBWI remains elevated throughout the study period, with no statistically significant differences observed between the two groups. Given the benefits and risks of iNO therapy, routine use in EPI and ELBWI may not be advisable.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This article is a retrospective registered study, registered under the number ChiCTR2200066935 on December 21, 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":14511,"journal":{"name":"Italian Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"51 1","pages":"207"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12232049/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-025-02035-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the lack of consensus, the use of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) in preterm infants with a gestational age (GA) of less than 34 weeks has been increasing in recent years. At present, there are no multi-center studies in China on the use of iNO in this population. This study aims to investigate the use of iNO in preterm infants under 34 weeks of gestation over the past 10 years in China, and provides evidence-based medical proof for the use of iNO in these neonates.

Methods: Using a retrospective study method, clinical data were collected from infants with a GA of less than 34 weeks who received iNO therapy in the neonatal units of five tertiary hospitals in China from January 2013 to December 2022. The infants were divided into two groups: Group A (2013-2017) and Group B (2018-2022). The differences in clinical characteristics, iNO use, and short-term outcomes between the two groups were analyzed.

Results: Over the past decade, the use of iNO in preterm infants with a GA of less than 34 weeks has increased gradually, with a more pronounced rise in its use among preterm infants born at 24-27 weeks. The proportion of infants receiving iNO therapy has increased from 1.23% (Group A) to 2.62% (Group B). Compared to Group A, the infants in Group B who received iNO therapy had a smaller GA and lower birth weight. The initial and maximum doses of iNO in Group B were higher (10.0 ppm vs. 8.0 ppm, 15.0 ppm vs. 9.0 ppm). More than half of the extremely preterm infants (EPI) and extremely low birth weight infants (ELBWI) died in both groups. In preterm infants with a GA of 32-33 weeks who were treated with iNO, the case fatality rate was significantly lower in Group B compared to Group A (9.1% vs. 28.2%).

Conclusion: The use of iNO in preterm infants with a GA of < 34 weeks has increased over the past 10 years. The treatment strategy for iNO has become more aggressive, and the observed reduction in mortality among relatively older preterm infants (32-33 weeks GA) may be linked to increased iNO utilization and higher dosing regimens. Notably, the case fatality rate among EPI and ELBWI remains elevated throughout the study period, with no statistically significant differences observed between the two groups. Given the benefits and risks of iNO therapy, routine use in EPI and ELBWI may not be advisable.

Trial registration: This article is a retrospective registered study, registered under the number ChiCTR2200066935 on December 21, 2022.

吸入一氧化氮治疗妊娠34周前早产儿:一项全国性多中心研究。
背景:尽管缺乏共识,近年来,在胎龄小于34周的早产儿中使用吸入型一氧化氮(iNO)的情况有所增加。目前,国内尚无针对该人群使用iNO的多中心研究。本研究旨在调查中国近10年来34周以下早产儿使用一氧化氮的情况,为这些新生儿使用一氧化氮提供循证医学依据。方法:采用回顾性研究方法,收集2013年1月至2022年12月在中国五家三级医院新生儿病房接受iNO治疗的GA小于34周的婴儿的临床资料。将患儿分为A组(2013-2017)和B组(2018-2022)。分析两组患者的临床特点、iNO使用情况及近期疗效的差异。结果:在过去十年中,GA小于34周的早产儿使用iNO的情况逐渐增加,其中24-27周的早产儿使用iNO的增加更为明显。婴儿接受iNO治疗的比例从1.23% (A组)增加到2.62% (B组)。与A组相比,B组接受iNO治疗的婴儿GA更小,出生体重更低。B组iNO的初始和最大剂量更高(10.0 ppm vs 8.0 ppm, 15.0 ppm vs 9.0 ppm)。两组中超过一半的极早产儿(EPI)和极低出生体重儿(ELBWI)死亡。在GA为32-33周且接受iNO治疗的早产儿中,B组的病死率明显低于a组(9.1%对28.2%)。结论:iNO在具有GA试验注册的早产儿中的应用:本文是一项回顾性注册研究,注册编号为ChiCTR2200066935,注册日期为2022年12月21日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
13.90%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Italian Journal of Pediatrics is an open access peer-reviewed journal that includes all aspects of pediatric medicine. The journal also covers health service and public health research that addresses primary care issues. The journal provides a high-quality forum for pediatricians and other healthcare professionals to report and discuss up-to-the-minute research and expert reviews in the field of pediatric medicine. The journal will continue to develop the range of articles published to enable this invaluable resource to stay at the forefront of the field. Italian Journal of Pediatrics, which commenced in 1975 as Rivista Italiana di Pediatria, provides a high-quality forum for pediatricians and other healthcare professionals to report and discuss up-to-the-minute research and expert reviews in the field of pediatric medicine. The journal will continue to develop the range of articles published to enable this invaluable resource to stay at the forefront of the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信