Barbara Vass-Bognár, Mikolt Bakony, Kinga Fornyos, Walter Baumgartner, Johannes Lorenz Khol, Viktor Jurkovich
{"title":"When is the best time to test paratuberculosis positivity? Observations from a follow-up study in Hungarian dairy herds.","authors":"Barbara Vass-Bognár, Mikolt Bakony, Kinga Fornyos, Walter Baumgartner, Johannes Lorenz Khol, Viktor Jurkovich","doi":"10.3389/fvets.2025.1570915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of the present study was to find the most practical combination of diagnostic procedures and time points during lactation to identify <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> ssp. <i>paratuberculosis</i> (MAP)-infected animals. Four Hungarian dairy farms with a 4-5% apparent MAP positivity were enrolled in the study, and 13 non-lactating, known MAP-positive pregnant cows were chosen from each farm. Feces, blood, and milk samples were collected from each cow at 1-5, 10-14, 40-60, 90-120, 180-200, and 280-300 days in milk (DIM) and ELISA and PCR assays were performed for antibody or pathogen detection. Animals that later developed clinical paratuberculosis symptoms showed distinctly different patterns of test positivity than those that did not develop clinical symptoms during the observation period. The optimal time for detecting MAP-positive animals with the highest probability was DIM 40-60 with serum ELISA and DIM 10-14 and 40-60 for PCR assays, respectively. Serum ELISA proved to be slightly more sensitive than milk ELISA. S/P values showed a moderate correlation with the fecal qPCR Ct values. We found that the most suitable period for MAP screening is 40-60 days after calving.</p>","PeriodicalId":12772,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","volume":"12 ","pages":"1570915"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12225305/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1570915","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The objective of the present study was to find the most practical combination of diagnostic procedures and time points during lactation to identify Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis (MAP)-infected animals. Four Hungarian dairy farms with a 4-5% apparent MAP positivity were enrolled in the study, and 13 non-lactating, known MAP-positive pregnant cows were chosen from each farm. Feces, blood, and milk samples were collected from each cow at 1-5, 10-14, 40-60, 90-120, 180-200, and 280-300 days in milk (DIM) and ELISA and PCR assays were performed for antibody or pathogen detection. Animals that later developed clinical paratuberculosis symptoms showed distinctly different patterns of test positivity than those that did not develop clinical symptoms during the observation period. The optimal time for detecting MAP-positive animals with the highest probability was DIM 40-60 with serum ELISA and DIM 10-14 and 40-60 for PCR assays, respectively. Serum ELISA proved to be slightly more sensitive than milk ELISA. S/P values showed a moderate correlation with the fecal qPCR Ct values. We found that the most suitable period for MAP screening is 40-60 days after calving.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Veterinary Science is a global, peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that bridges animal and human health, brings a comparative approach to medical and surgical challenges, and advances innovative biotechnology and therapy.
Veterinary research today is interdisciplinary, collaborative, and socially relevant, transforming how we understand and investigate animal health and disease. Fundamental research in emerging infectious diseases, predictive genomics, stem cell therapy, and translational modelling is grounded within the integrative social context of public and environmental health, wildlife conservation, novel biomarkers, societal well-being, and cutting-edge clinical practice and specialization. Frontiers in Veterinary Science brings a 21st-century approach—networked, collaborative, and Open Access—to communicate this progress and innovation to both the specialist and to the wider audience of readers in the field.
Frontiers in Veterinary Science publishes articles on outstanding discoveries across a wide spectrum of translational, foundational, and clinical research. The journal''s mission is to bring all relevant veterinary sciences together on a single platform with the goal of improving animal and human health.