How resource acquisition influences the detection of trade-offs.

IF 3.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Evolution Pub Date : 2025-07-04 DOI:10.1093/evolut/qpaf139
L Winkler, K B McNamara, M Lovegrove, J L Fitzpatrick, L W Simmons
{"title":"How resource acquisition influences the detection of trade-offs.","authors":"L Winkler, K B McNamara, M Lovegrove, J L Fitzpatrick, L W Simmons","doi":"10.1093/evolut/qpaf139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Trade-offs should be ubiquitous in nature. Yet, direct trade-offs between traits essential for fitness are challenging to detect. Recent theory suggests that population level variation in resource acquisition could play an important role in our ability to detect trade-offs. Here, we test experimentally the hypothesis that the detection of trade-offs depends on the underlying distribution of individuals with different resource acquisition in a population. Specifically, we re-sampled ecologically and experimentally relevant resource acquisition distributions from a population of male Australian field crickets (Teleogryllus oceanicus) subjected to a continuous range of diet manipulation. While we found evidence for trade-offs between different male fitness traits, the distribution of resource acquisition in the population had no systematic effect on the strength of these trade-offs. Interestingly, trade-offs were most pronounced between post-copulatory traits and immune function, but trade-offs involving pre-copulatory traits were relatively weak. Overall, our findings question the hypothesis that resource acquisition may influence our ability to detect trade-offs and instead suggest that other factors, like the hierarchical complexity of resource allocation, make detecting trade-offs so elusive.</p>","PeriodicalId":12082,"journal":{"name":"Evolution","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/evolut/qpaf139","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trade-offs should be ubiquitous in nature. Yet, direct trade-offs between traits essential for fitness are challenging to detect. Recent theory suggests that population level variation in resource acquisition could play an important role in our ability to detect trade-offs. Here, we test experimentally the hypothesis that the detection of trade-offs depends on the underlying distribution of individuals with different resource acquisition in a population. Specifically, we re-sampled ecologically and experimentally relevant resource acquisition distributions from a population of male Australian field crickets (Teleogryllus oceanicus) subjected to a continuous range of diet manipulation. While we found evidence for trade-offs between different male fitness traits, the distribution of resource acquisition in the population had no systematic effect on the strength of these trade-offs. Interestingly, trade-offs were most pronounced between post-copulatory traits and immune function, but trade-offs involving pre-copulatory traits were relatively weak. Overall, our findings question the hypothesis that resource acquisition may influence our ability to detect trade-offs and instead suggest that other factors, like the hierarchical complexity of resource allocation, make detecting trade-offs so elusive.

资源获取如何影响权衡的检测。
权衡应该在自然界中无处不在。然而,对健康至关重要的特征之间的直接权衡是很难发现的。最近的理论表明,资源获取的人口水平差异可能在我们检测权衡的能力中发挥重要作用。在这里,我们通过实验验证了一个假设,即权衡的检测取决于种群中具有不同资源获取的个体的潜在分布。具体地说,我们重新采样了生态和实验相关的资源获取分布,从一个雄性澳大利亚田蟋蟀(Teleogryllus oceanicus)种群遭受连续范围的饮食操纵。虽然我们发现了不同男性适合度特征之间存在权衡的证据,但种群中资源获取的分布对这些权衡的强度没有系统性影响。有趣的是,交配后的特征和免疫功能之间的权衡最为明显,但涉及交配前的特征的权衡相对较弱。总的来说,我们的研究结果质疑了资源获取可能会影响我们检测权衡的能力的假设,而是表明其他因素,如资源分配的层次复杂性,使得检测权衡如此难以捉摸。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evolution
Evolution 环境科学-进化生物学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Evolution, published for the Society for the Study of Evolution, is the premier publication devoted to the study of organic evolution and the integration of the various fields of science concerned with evolution. The journal presents significant and original results that extend our understanding of evolutionary phenomena and processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信