Beryllium Lymphocyte Proliferation Test: Differential Diagnosis of Sarcoidosis and Chronic Beryllium Disease.

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2025.06.034
Louis Jouanjan, Charlott Terschluse, Gernot Zissel, Prerana Agarwal, Emil Wachenfeld, Caroline Quartucci, Daniel Soriano, Joachim Müller-Quernheim, Daiana Stolz, Björn C Frye
{"title":"Beryllium Lymphocyte Proliferation Test: Differential Diagnosis of Sarcoidosis and Chronic Beryllium Disease.","authors":"Louis Jouanjan, Charlott Terschluse, Gernot Zissel, Prerana Agarwal, Emil Wachenfeld, Caroline Quartucci, Daniel Soriano, Joachim Müller-Quernheim, Daiana Stolz, Björn C Frye","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2025.06.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic beryllium disease (CBD) is considered a phenocopy of sarcoidosis, generally caused by occupational exposure to beryllium. Its diagnosis relies on the demonstration of beryllium sensitisation by the beryllium lymphocyte proliferation test (BeLPT).</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>How well does the BeLPT discriminate between CBD and sarcoidosis in patients with suspected beryllium exposure and what are the clinical characteristics of these two groups?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>BeLPT results and clinical characteristics of patients with suspected beryllium exposure were retrospectively analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,234 BeLPTs from 431 patients were included. Of 210 patients with established granulomatous disease, 87 patients (41.4%) were diagnosed with CBD and 106 (50.5%) with sarcoidosis; in 17 cases (8.1%) the BeLPT results were inconclusive. The remaining 221 patients had other diagnoses or could not be classified. A single BeLPT had a sensitivity of 61.5% (CI 55.8-67.0) and a specificity of 90.8% (86.5-93.9). For split-sample tests, the sensitivity and specificity were 76.0% (67.7-82.8) and 80.4% (71.4-87.1), respectively. Patients with CBD had lower lung function than those with sarcoidosis, as measured by forced vital capacity (mean z-score -1.58 vs -0.75; p = 0.002). A restrictive pattern was more common in CBD than in sarcoidosis (41.0% vs 14.8%; OR = 3.99; p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Despite low sensitivity, the BeLPT was able to detect CBD in 41.4% of patients with a granulomatous disease and suspected beryllium exposure. CBD was associated with lower lung function compared with sarcoidosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.06.034","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic beryllium disease (CBD) is considered a phenocopy of sarcoidosis, generally caused by occupational exposure to beryllium. Its diagnosis relies on the demonstration of beryllium sensitisation by the beryllium lymphocyte proliferation test (BeLPT).

Research question: How well does the BeLPT discriminate between CBD and sarcoidosis in patients with suspected beryllium exposure and what are the clinical characteristics of these two groups?

Study design and methods: BeLPT results and clinical characteristics of patients with suspected beryllium exposure were retrospectively analysed.

Results: A total of 1,234 BeLPTs from 431 patients were included. Of 210 patients with established granulomatous disease, 87 patients (41.4%) were diagnosed with CBD and 106 (50.5%) with sarcoidosis; in 17 cases (8.1%) the BeLPT results were inconclusive. The remaining 221 patients had other diagnoses or could not be classified. A single BeLPT had a sensitivity of 61.5% (CI 55.8-67.0) and a specificity of 90.8% (86.5-93.9). For split-sample tests, the sensitivity and specificity were 76.0% (67.7-82.8) and 80.4% (71.4-87.1), respectively. Patients with CBD had lower lung function than those with sarcoidosis, as measured by forced vital capacity (mean z-score -1.58 vs -0.75; p = 0.002). A restrictive pattern was more common in CBD than in sarcoidosis (41.0% vs 14.8%; OR = 3.99; p = 0.002).

Interpretation: Despite low sensitivity, the BeLPT was able to detect CBD in 41.4% of patients with a granulomatous disease and suspected beryllium exposure. CBD was associated with lower lung function compared with sarcoidosis.

铍淋巴细胞增殖试验:结节病和慢性铍病的鉴别诊断。
背景:慢性铍病(CBD)被认为是结节病的一种表型,通常由职业接触铍引起。其诊断依赖于铍淋巴细胞增殖试验(BeLPT)显示的铍致敏。研究问题:在疑似铍暴露的患者中,BeLPT区分CBD和结节病的效果如何?这两组的临床特征是什么?研究设计和方法:回顾性分析疑似铍暴露患者的BeLPT结果和临床特征。结果:共纳入431例患者的1234例BeLPTs。210例确诊肉芽肿性疾病患者中,87例(41.4%)诊断为CBD, 106例(50.5%)诊断为结节病;17例(8.1%)的BeLPT结果不确定。其余221名患者有其他诊断或无法分类。单个BeLPT的敏感性为61.5% (CI 55.8-67.0),特异性为90.8% (CI 86.5-93.9)。对于分离样本试验,敏感性和特异性分别为76.0%(67.7-82.8)和80.4%(71.4-87.1)。通过用力肺活量测量,CBD患者的肺功能低于结节病患者(平均z-score -1.58 vs -0.75;P = 0.002)。限制性模式在CBD中比结节病中更常见(41.0% vs 14.8%;Or = 3.99;P = 0.002)。解释:尽管灵敏度较低,但BeLPT能够在41.4%的肉芽肿性疾病和疑似铍暴露的患者中检测到CBD。与结节病相比,CBD与较低的肺功能相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信