Perioperative management with DMARDs in rheumatic diseases: a scoping review of clinical guidelines.

IF 2.1 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Alice Terrett, Athena Chin, Mihye Kwon, Samuel Whittle, Catherine Hill
{"title":"Perioperative management with DMARDs in rheumatic diseases: a scoping review of clinical guidelines.","authors":"Alice Terrett, Athena Chin, Mihye Kwon, Samuel Whittle, Catherine Hill","doi":"10.1186/s41927-025-00522-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases have high rates of surgical procedures including joint replacements despite the use of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). This scoping review compares clinical practice guideline recommendations for the perioperative management of DMARDs in such patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medline and EMBASE were searched, and a hand search of references was performed to obtain guidelines published since 2014 by national/international academic societies in rheumatology addressing perioperative management of DMARDs in any of adult rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Data extraction was performed in duplicate by two authors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve guidelines were included - 10 (83%) incorporated a perioperative recommendation within a broader guideline. RA was the sole rheumatic condition in 6 (50%) guidelines. Low-moderate quality evidence supported these recommendations, based on evidence from studies of participants undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery. Guidelines varied in development process, format, the choice of evidence system, level of evidence, strength of recommendation and recommendations for biologic DMARD (bDMARD) use and timing of surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although guidelines for the use of DMARDs in the perioperative period are widely available, the development process and recommendations vary between guidelines. There is a lack of high quality evidence to support recommendations for non-elective, non-orthopaedic surgery cases. Variations in recommendations for bDMARDs in the perioperative period were common, potentially leading to more practice variation in bDMARD use in the perioperative period. Continued accrual and review of evidence will provide greater support for recommendations in this clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":9150,"journal":{"name":"BMC Rheumatology","volume":"9 1","pages":"81"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12224603/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41927-025-00522-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases have high rates of surgical procedures including joint replacements despite the use of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). This scoping review compares clinical practice guideline recommendations for the perioperative management of DMARDs in such patients.

Methods: Medline and EMBASE were searched, and a hand search of references was performed to obtain guidelines published since 2014 by national/international academic societies in rheumatology addressing perioperative management of DMARDs in any of adult rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Data extraction was performed in duplicate by two authors.

Results: Twelve guidelines were included - 10 (83%) incorporated a perioperative recommendation within a broader guideline. RA was the sole rheumatic condition in 6 (50%) guidelines. Low-moderate quality evidence supported these recommendations, based on evidence from studies of participants undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery. Guidelines varied in development process, format, the choice of evidence system, level of evidence, strength of recommendation and recommendations for biologic DMARD (bDMARD) use and timing of surgery.

Conclusion: Although guidelines for the use of DMARDs in the perioperative period are widely available, the development process and recommendations vary between guidelines. There is a lack of high quality evidence to support recommendations for non-elective, non-orthopaedic surgery cases. Variations in recommendations for bDMARDs in the perioperative period were common, potentially leading to more practice variation in bDMARD use in the perioperative period. Continued accrual and review of evidence will provide greater support for recommendations in this clinical setting.

风湿病dmard围手术期治疗:临床指南的范围综述
目的:自身免疫性风湿病患者尽管使用了改善疾病的抗风湿药(DMARDs),但仍有很高的手术率,包括关节置换术。本综述比较了此类患者dmard围手术期治疗的临床实践指南建议。方法:检索Medline和EMBASE,并手工检索参考文献,以获得2014年以来由国家/国际风湿学学术学会发表的关于成人类风湿关节炎(RA)、强直性脊柱炎(AS)、银屑病关节炎(PsA)、青少年特发性关节炎(JIA)或系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者dmard围手术期管理的指南。数据提取由两位作者分两份进行。结果:纳入了12项指南- 10项(83%)在更广泛的指南中纳入了围手术期推荐。在6份(50%)指南中,RA是唯一的风湿病。中低质量的证据支持这些建议,这些证据基于对接受选择性骨科手术的参与者的研究。指南在制定过程、格式、证据系统的选择、证据水平、推荐强度和生物DMARD (bDMARD)使用的建议以及手术时间方面各不相同。结论:虽然围手术期使用dmard的指南广泛可用,但不同指南的制定过程和建议各不相同。缺乏高质量的证据来支持非选择性、非矫形手术病例的建议。围手术期bDMARD建议的变化是常见的,这可能导致围手术期bDMARD使用的更多实践变化。继续积累和审查证据将为临床环境中的建议提供更大的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Rheumatology
BMC Rheumatology Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信