The effect of qigong on frailty in older cancer survivors: a randomised controlled trial.

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Denise Shuk Ting Cheung, Wing Lok Chan, Pui Hing Chau, Inda Sung Soong, Wing Fai Yeung, Shing Fung Lee, Parco M Siu, Jean Woo, Doris Sau Fung Yu, Chia-Chin Lin
{"title":"The effect of qigong on frailty in older cancer survivors: a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Denise Shuk Ting Cheung, Wing Lok Chan, Pui Hing Chau, Inda Sung Soong, Wing Fai Yeung, Shing Fung Lee, Parco M Siu, Jean Woo, Doris Sau Fung Yu, Chia-Chin Lin","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frailty predicts increased cancer recurrence and mortality among older cancer survivors. Qigong has been shown to improve physical and mental well-being, as well as inflammation, which are closely linked with frailty in the cancer population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the effect of qigong on frailty among older cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An assessor-blind multi-centre randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Post-treatment cancer survivors aged 65+ screened as pre-frail or frail based on the Fried frailty phenotype were recruited and randomised to an intervention (16-week qigong Baduanjin) or an active control group (16-week light flexibility exercise). The primary outcome was the reversal of frailty status. The secondary outcomes included physical frailty severity, multidimensional frailty severity, physical performance, psychological well-being and quality of life. Analysis was based on the intention-to-treat principle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred twenty-six older cancer survivors were randomised, 113 to the qigong group and 113 to the light flexibility exercise group. At 16 weeks, the difference in the rates of frailty reversal in the qigong group (28.7%) and the light flexibility exercise group (22.5%) was insignificant (adjusted odds ratio = 1.39, 95% CI, 0.65 to 2.95). While both groups had significant improvement in physical frailty severity, physical performance, psychological well-being and quality of life, only the qigong group had significant improvement in multidimensional frailty severity. The group × time interaction was not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Qigong was not superior to an active control in its effect on improving frailty in older cancer survivors. Researchers should include routine care as control and examine the underlying mechanisms driving the change in frailty.</p>","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"54 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231580/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf184","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Frailty predicts increased cancer recurrence and mortality among older cancer survivors. Qigong has been shown to improve physical and mental well-being, as well as inflammation, which are closely linked with frailty in the cancer population.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effect of qigong on frailty among older cancer survivors.

Design: An assessor-blind multi-centre randomised controlled trial.

Methods: Post-treatment cancer survivors aged 65+ screened as pre-frail or frail based on the Fried frailty phenotype were recruited and randomised to an intervention (16-week qigong Baduanjin) or an active control group (16-week light flexibility exercise). The primary outcome was the reversal of frailty status. The secondary outcomes included physical frailty severity, multidimensional frailty severity, physical performance, psychological well-being and quality of life. Analysis was based on the intention-to-treat principle.

Results: Two hundred twenty-six older cancer survivors were randomised, 113 to the qigong group and 113 to the light flexibility exercise group. At 16 weeks, the difference in the rates of frailty reversal in the qigong group (28.7%) and the light flexibility exercise group (22.5%) was insignificant (adjusted odds ratio = 1.39, 95% CI, 0.65 to 2.95). While both groups had significant improvement in physical frailty severity, physical performance, psychological well-being and quality of life, only the qigong group had significant improvement in multidimensional frailty severity. The group × time interaction was not significant.

Conclusion: Qigong was not superior to an active control in its effect on improving frailty in older cancer survivors. Researchers should include routine care as control and examine the underlying mechanisms driving the change in frailty.

气功对老年癌症幸存者虚弱的影响:一项随机对照试验。
背景:在老年癌症幸存者中,虚弱预示着癌症复发和死亡率的增加。气功已被证明可以改善身体和精神健康,以及炎症,这与癌症人群的虚弱密切相关。目的:本研究旨在评估气功对老年癌症幸存者虚弱的影响。设计:评估盲多中心随机对照试验。方法:招募65岁以上的治疗后癌症幸存者,根据Fried脆弱表型筛选为虚弱或虚弱,并随机分为干预组(16周气功八段锦)或积极对照组(16周轻度柔韧性锻炼)。主要结果是虚弱状态的逆转。次要结局包括身体虚弱严重程度、多维虚弱严重程度、身体表现、心理健康和生活质量。分析依据意向性治疗原则。结果:226名老年癌症幸存者被随机分配,其中113人参加气功组,113人参加轻度柔韧性锻炼组。16周时,气功组(28.7%)和轻度柔韧性运动组(22.5%)的衰弱逆转率差异不显著(校正优势比= 1.39,95% CI, 0.65 ~ 2.95)。虽然两组在身体虚弱严重程度、身体表现、心理健康和生活质量方面都有显著改善,但只有气功组在多维虚弱严重程度方面有显著改善。组×时间交互作用不显著。结论:气功在改善老年癌症幸存者虚弱方面并不优于主动对照。研究人员应该将常规护理作为对照,并检查驱动虚弱变化的潜在机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信