Social Vulnerability and Racial Disparities in Depression Screening of US Adolescents, 2016 to 2021.

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Kathleen Galper, Jillian M Rung, Amber Shergill, Tyson S Barrett, Demetrios Marousis, Emily Brignone
{"title":"Social Vulnerability and Racial Disparities in Depression Screening of US Adolescents, 2016 to 2021.","authors":"Kathleen Galper, Jillian M Rung, Amber Shergill, Tyson S Barrett, Demetrios Marousis, Emily Brignone","doi":"10.2105/AJPH.2025.308149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives.</b> To identify whether sociodemographic disparities exist by evaluating the association between rates of adolescent depression screening, social risk, and race. <b>Methods.</b> We used a US nationwide sample of Highmark Health privately insured adolescents between 2016 and 2021 to estimate the odds of well-visit depression screening receipt as a function of social factors (Social Vulnerability Index [SVI], predicted race). <b>Results.</b> Higher SVI was negatively associated with odds of screening and depended on predicted Black race (<i>P</i> for interaction < .01). Provider type was a strong predictor of screening, with pediatricians more likely to screen than other generalist specialties (odds ratio = 9.64; 95% confidence interval = 9.11, 10.2). Inclusion of variation at the practice location level attenuated the relationship with SVI and accounted for a large proportion of variability in screening (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.76), although SVI remained significant ( <i>P</i> < .01). <b>Conclusions.</b> Adolescents are more likely to receive a depression screen if they reside in lower social-risk locations or, if likely to identify as Black, higher social-risk locations. Ultimately, screening has strong ties to where an adolescent lives and the type of provider they access. (<i>Am J Public Health</i>. Published online ahead of print July 3, 2025:e1-e9. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2025.308149).</p>","PeriodicalId":7647,"journal":{"name":"American journal of public health","volume":" ","pages":"e1-e9"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2025.308149","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives. To identify whether sociodemographic disparities exist by evaluating the association between rates of adolescent depression screening, social risk, and race. Methods. We used a US nationwide sample of Highmark Health privately insured adolescents between 2016 and 2021 to estimate the odds of well-visit depression screening receipt as a function of social factors (Social Vulnerability Index [SVI], predicted race). Results. Higher SVI was negatively associated with odds of screening and depended on predicted Black race (P for interaction < .01). Provider type was a strong predictor of screening, with pediatricians more likely to screen than other generalist specialties (odds ratio = 9.64; 95% confidence interval = 9.11, 10.2). Inclusion of variation at the practice location level attenuated the relationship with SVI and accounted for a large proportion of variability in screening (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.76), although SVI remained significant ( P < .01). Conclusions. Adolescents are more likely to receive a depression screen if they reside in lower social-risk locations or, if likely to identify as Black, higher social-risk locations. Ultimately, screening has strong ties to where an adolescent lives and the type of provider they access. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print July 3, 2025:e1-e9. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2025.308149).

2016年至2021年美国青少年抑郁症筛查中的社会脆弱性和种族差异
目标。通过评估青少年抑郁症筛查率、社会风险和种族之间的关系,确定是否存在社会人口差异。方法。我们使用了2016年至2021年间美国全国范围内的Highmark Health私人保险青少年样本,以估计社会因素(社会脆弱性指数[SVI],预测种族)对抑郁症筛查接受率的影响。结果。较高的SVI与筛查几率呈负相关,并依赖于预测的黑人种族(P为相互作用P)。如果青少年居住在社会风险较低的地区,他们更有可能接受抑郁症筛查,如果他们可能被认定为黑人,则可能居住在社会风险较高的地区。最终,筛查与青少年的生活地点和他们所接触的提供者的类型密切相关。公共卫生。2025年7月3日在线出版:e1-e9。https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2025.308149)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of public health
American journal of public health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
3.90%
发文量
1109
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Public Health (AJPH) is dedicated to publishing original work in research, research methods, and program evaluation within the field of public health. The journal's mission is to advance public health research, policy, practice, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信