Statistical analysis and uncertainty risk assessment of large-scale fatal gas explosions based on Chinese coal mine accidents.

IF 5.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Wei Zhang, Deming Wang
{"title":"Statistical analysis and uncertainty risk assessment of large-scale fatal gas explosions based on Chinese coal mine accidents.","authors":"Wei Zhang, Deming Wang","doi":"10.1007/s11356-025-36703-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Large-scale fatal gas explosions (LSFGEs) are primary accidents in coalmines owing to complicated formation and coupling paths of the causative factors. Therefore, space-time distributions of 282 LSFGEs from 2000 to 2022 in Chinese coalmines were analyzed. A cause-chain inference model of gas explosion was proposed using the Delphi method and Bayesian network (BN). The results showed that working-excavating faces and winter were the main sites and seasons of gas explosions respectively, accounting for 67% and 32.3%. These statistics suggested the ignition sources of 14.5% of LSFGEs were fuzzy, including coal spontaneous combustion and friction sparks. Moreover, instantaneous gas overruns were attributed to periodic roof caving and coal-rock dynamic disasters, accounting for 11.0%. The change in roof pressures and concealment of the enclosed areas were key risk factors of a gas explosion. A comprehensive analysis of cause-chains with expert knowledge and probabilistic inference reduced the epistemic uncertainty of fuzzy causes. The sensitivity analysis highlighted electric sparks and the absence of wind or breeze as the primary causes of gas explosion accidents and its percentage of exceeded 20%. This study aimed to elucidate key causative factors and their interrelationships in gas explosions, providing valuable guidance for daily risk management and accident investigations.</p>","PeriodicalId":545,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-025-36703-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large-scale fatal gas explosions (LSFGEs) are primary accidents in coalmines owing to complicated formation and coupling paths of the causative factors. Therefore, space-time distributions of 282 LSFGEs from 2000 to 2022 in Chinese coalmines were analyzed. A cause-chain inference model of gas explosion was proposed using the Delphi method and Bayesian network (BN). The results showed that working-excavating faces and winter were the main sites and seasons of gas explosions respectively, accounting for 67% and 32.3%. These statistics suggested the ignition sources of 14.5% of LSFGEs were fuzzy, including coal spontaneous combustion and friction sparks. Moreover, instantaneous gas overruns were attributed to periodic roof caving and coal-rock dynamic disasters, accounting for 11.0%. The change in roof pressures and concealment of the enclosed areas were key risk factors of a gas explosion. A comprehensive analysis of cause-chains with expert knowledge and probabilistic inference reduced the epistemic uncertainty of fuzzy causes. The sensitivity analysis highlighted electric sparks and the absence of wind or breeze as the primary causes of gas explosion accidents and its percentage of exceeded 20%. This study aimed to elucidate key causative factors and their interrelationships in gas explosions, providing valuable guidance for daily risk management and accident investigations.

基于中国煤矿大范围瓦斯爆炸事故的统计分析与不确定性风险评估。
大型致命瓦斯爆炸是煤矿的主要事故,其成因复杂、耦合路径复杂。为此,对2000 - 2022年我国煤矿282个LSFGEs的时空分布进行了分析。利用德尔菲法和贝叶斯网络,建立了瓦斯爆炸的因果链推理模型。结果表明:工作面和冬季是瓦斯爆炸发生的主要部位和季节,分别占瓦斯爆炸发生的67%和32.3%;统计结果表明,14.5%的轻燃锅炉的着火源是模糊的,包括煤自燃和摩擦火花。周期性冒顶煤岩动力灾害造成瞬时瓦斯超量占11.0%。顶板压力的变化和封闭区域的隐蔽性是瓦斯爆炸的关键危险因素。利用专家知识和概率推理对原因链进行综合分析,降低了模糊原因的认知不确定性。灵敏度分析强调电火花和无风是瓦斯爆炸事故的主要原因,其百分比超过20%。本研究旨在阐明瓦斯爆炸的主要致病因素及其相互关系,为日常风险管理和事故调查提供有价值的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
6549
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science and Pollution Research (ESPR) serves the international community in all areas of Environmental Science and related subjects with emphasis on chemical compounds. This includes: - Terrestrial Biology and Ecology - Aquatic Biology and Ecology - Atmospheric Chemistry - Environmental Microbiology/Biobased Energy Sources - Phytoremediation and Ecosystem Restoration - Environmental Analyses and Monitoring - Assessment of Risks and Interactions of Pollutants in the Environment - Conservation Biology and Sustainable Agriculture - Impact of Chemicals/Pollutants on Human and Animal Health It reports from a broad interdisciplinary outlook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信