{"title":"Residual pulmonary hypertension and clinical outcomes in acute decompensated heart failure patients stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction.","authors":"Toshikazu D Tanaka, Yasuyuki Shiraishi, Ryeonshi Kang, Takashi Kohno, Satoshi Shoji, Toraaki Okuyama, Yuhei Oi, Ayumi Goda, Ryo Nakamaru, Yuji Nagatomo, Mitsunobu Kitamura, Munehisa Sakamoto, Michiru Nomoto, Atsushi Mizuno, Tomohisa Nagoshi, Shun Kohsaka, Tsutomu Yoshikawa","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.3755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The precise outcomes for patients with residual pulmonary hypertension (PH) following the optimized treatment of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) remain poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic association of PH, categorized according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), in hospitalized ADHF patients.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The WET-HF registry is a multicentre, prospective cohort ADHF registry. Patients were classified into four groups according to tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV) and LVEF. PH was defined as peak TRV >2.8 m/s. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure (HF) rehospitalization at 2 years. In total, 1702 patients had nonPH-HF with LVEF <50% (n = 689 [40.5%]), PH-HF with LVEF <50% (n = 291 [17.1%]), nonPH-HF with LVEF ≥50% (n = 453 [26.6%]), and PH-HF with LVEF ≥50% (n = 269 [15.8%]). A significant difference in the composite endpoint was observed between patients with and without PH (42.3% vs. 30.4%, p < 0.001), with no significant interaction between PH and LVEF. Notably, in the nonPH-HF group, there were significant differences in clinical outcomes between patients with more than 30% B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) improvement and those with less (composite endpoint 27.5% vs. 41.8%, p < 0.001; all-cause mortality 9.4% vs. 24.6%, p < 0.001; HF rehospitalization 20.2% vs. 32.8%, p = 0.001). However, no such difference was evident in the PH-HF group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prognostic importance of residual PH was comparable across both HF with reduced and preserved ejection fraction patients. While the prognostic significance of BNP improvement on clinical outcomes was attenuated in the presence of residual PH, utilizing residual PH for risk stratification effectively identified patients at increased risk of mortality and rehospitalization following ADHF, irrespective of their LVEF.</p>","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3755","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: The precise outcomes for patients with residual pulmonary hypertension (PH) following the optimized treatment of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) remain poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic association of PH, categorized according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), in hospitalized ADHF patients.
Methods and results: The WET-HF registry is a multicentre, prospective cohort ADHF registry. Patients were classified into four groups according to tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV) and LVEF. PH was defined as peak TRV >2.8 m/s. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure (HF) rehospitalization at 2 years. In total, 1702 patients had nonPH-HF with LVEF <50% (n = 689 [40.5%]), PH-HF with LVEF <50% (n = 291 [17.1%]), nonPH-HF with LVEF ≥50% (n = 453 [26.6%]), and PH-HF with LVEF ≥50% (n = 269 [15.8%]). A significant difference in the composite endpoint was observed between patients with and without PH (42.3% vs. 30.4%, p < 0.001), with no significant interaction between PH and LVEF. Notably, in the nonPH-HF group, there were significant differences in clinical outcomes between patients with more than 30% B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) improvement and those with less (composite endpoint 27.5% vs. 41.8%, p < 0.001; all-cause mortality 9.4% vs. 24.6%, p < 0.001; HF rehospitalization 20.2% vs. 32.8%, p = 0.001). However, no such difference was evident in the PH-HF group.
Conclusions: The prognostic importance of residual PH was comparable across both HF with reduced and preserved ejection fraction patients. While the prognostic significance of BNP improvement on clinical outcomes was attenuated in the presence of residual PH, utilizing residual PH for risk stratification effectively identified patients at increased risk of mortality and rehospitalization following ADHF, irrespective of their LVEF.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Heart Failure is an international journal dedicated to advancing knowledge in the field of heart failure management. The journal publishes reviews and editorials aimed at improving understanding, prevention, investigation, and treatment of heart failure. It covers various disciplines such as molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, clinical sciences, social sciences, and population sciences. The journal welcomes submissions of manuscripts on basic, clinical, and population sciences, as well as original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics, and other related specialist fields. It is published monthly and has a readership that includes cardiologists, emergency room physicians, intensivists, internists, general physicians, cardiac nurses, diabetologists, epidemiologists, basic scientists focusing on cardiovascular research, and those working in rehabilitation. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Academic Search, Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Science Citation Index.