{"title":"Moral Dilemmas and the God of Christianity: Philosophical-Theological Investigations","authors":"Edmund N. Santurri","doi":"10.1111/jore.12494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>My central contention is that Christian ethics should rule out the possibility of genuine moral dilemmas, where “moral dilemma” signifies a situation in which all courses of action available to an agent are morally wrong. The reason for the exclusion is that the existence of a genuine moral dilemma would signify a conflict in the divine will that confirms, warrants, or constitutes moral requirement according to Christian ethics. A genuine moral dilemma would indicate that God commands incompatible courses of action and, therefore, commands the impossible. A reasonable, loving, providential God does not command the impossible. Along the way, I criticize standard “phenomenological” arguments employed by both secular moral philosophers and Christian ethicists in support of dilemmas and show where other arguments of dilemmas-affirming Christian ethicists go wrong.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":45722,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS","volume":"53 1","pages":"10-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS ETHICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jore.12494","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
My central contention is that Christian ethics should rule out the possibility of genuine moral dilemmas, where “moral dilemma” signifies a situation in which all courses of action available to an agent are morally wrong. The reason for the exclusion is that the existence of a genuine moral dilemma would signify a conflict in the divine will that confirms, warrants, or constitutes moral requirement according to Christian ethics. A genuine moral dilemma would indicate that God commands incompatible courses of action and, therefore, commands the impossible. A reasonable, loving, providential God does not command the impossible. Along the way, I criticize standard “phenomenological” arguments employed by both secular moral philosophers and Christian ethicists in support of dilemmas and show where other arguments of dilemmas-affirming Christian ethicists go wrong.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1973, the Journal of Religious Ethics is committed to publishing the very best scholarship in religious ethics, to fostering new work in neglected areas, and to stimulating exchange on significant issues. Emphasizing comparative religious ethics, foundational conceptual and methodological issues in religious ethics, and historical studies of influential figures and texts, each issue contains independent essays, commissioned articles, and a book review essay, as well as a Letters, Notes, and Comments section. Published primarily for scholars working in ethics, religious studies, history of religions, and theology, the journal is also of interest to scholars working in related fields such as philosophy, history, social and political theory, and literary studies.