{"title":"Spatial coherence of ecosystem indicators across the Scotian Shelf, Canada","authors":"Fonya Irvine , Eric J. Pedersen , Alida Bundy","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Marine ecosystems are subject to increasing pressure from climate change and a range of anthropogenic activities such as fishing, aquaculture, tourism, and energy extraction that take place at multiple spatial scales. Understanding the complex interplay between spatially and temporally varying marine ecosystem dynamics is needed for long-term sustainable management. Implementation of ecosystem-based management (EBM) relies in part on ecological indicators that link science to policy while also providing a means to explore ecosystem response to change and to assess progress toward management and policy goals. EBM requires reliable and robust indicators at commensurate spatial scales to assess the ecological impacts of pressures and management actions. We evaluated the spatial and temporal behaviour of ecological indicators at multiple spatial scales to answer three main questions: (i) Is the spatial and temporal resolution of current data collection in the Scotian Shelf fine-grained enough to detect changes in key indicators at the strata level? (ii) How closely do fluctuations in time series at the survey strata level match those at the larger spatial scales? (iii) Is there spatial coherence across survey strata and indicators? We developed a process for examining the reliability and robustness of ecological indicators at differing spatial scales to show that scale does indeed matter.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 113823"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25007538","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Marine ecosystems are subject to increasing pressure from climate change and a range of anthropogenic activities such as fishing, aquaculture, tourism, and energy extraction that take place at multiple spatial scales. Understanding the complex interplay between spatially and temporally varying marine ecosystem dynamics is needed for long-term sustainable management. Implementation of ecosystem-based management (EBM) relies in part on ecological indicators that link science to policy while also providing a means to explore ecosystem response to change and to assess progress toward management and policy goals. EBM requires reliable and robust indicators at commensurate spatial scales to assess the ecological impacts of pressures and management actions. We evaluated the spatial and temporal behaviour of ecological indicators at multiple spatial scales to answer three main questions: (i) Is the spatial and temporal resolution of current data collection in the Scotian Shelf fine-grained enough to detect changes in key indicators at the strata level? (ii) How closely do fluctuations in time series at the survey strata level match those at the larger spatial scales? (iii) Is there spatial coherence across survey strata and indicators? We developed a process for examining the reliability and robustness of ecological indicators at differing spatial scales to show that scale does indeed matter.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.