Yuxing Yan , Sixuan Wu , Yinglan A , Guoqiang Wang , Baolin Xue , Yuntao Wang , Jin Wu
{"title":"Collaborative allocation of water resources considering ecological marginal benefits in a semiarid and cold region","authors":"Yuxing Yan , Sixuan Wu , Yinglan A , Guoqiang Wang , Baolin Xue , Yuntao Wang , Jin Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Water resource optimization allocation is essential for maintaining ecological balance, promoting economic development, and ensuring social stability within river basins. However, many existing studies treated ecological water requirements as static baselines in allocation models, failing to address the dynamic utilization of water resources efficiently under varying hydrological conditions. In the Tao’er River Basin, a typical semiarid river basin, the combined effects of climate change and human activities have led to a severe imbalance between water supply and demand, particularly in regard to the competition between ecological water replenishment for the Xianghai Wetland, agricultural irrigation, and social water use. There is an urgent need for optimized water resource allocation to ensure the coordinated and sustainable development of these sectors. In this study, we developed the WEP-L model, a coupled natural–societal system, using various ecohydrological monitoring data to analyze the water supply–demand balance under different hydrological conditions. We proposed an allocation plan that considers ecological marginal benefits, agricultural needs, and water use guarantees: 1.04 × 10<sup>8</sup> m<sup>3</sup> for ecological supplementation and 5.16 × 10<sup>8</sup> m<sup>3</sup> for agricultural water in the flat year, adjusted to 0.94 × 10<sup>8</sup> m<sup>3</sup> and 3.60 × 10<sup>8</sup> m<sup>3</sup> in the dry year, respectively. Furthermore, by incorporating reservoir water supply rules into the WEP-L model, we simulated the feasibility of intra-annual water allocation. The proposed allocation scheme concentrates ecological water in spring during flat years and distributes it at a ratio of 80 % in spring and 20 % in autumn during dry years. This study emphasizes the dynamic adjustment of ecological water resources on the basis of environmental conditions and societal needs, aiming to maximize ecological and social benefits. It provides scientific support for optimizing ecological water allocation and offers practical guidance for wetland conservation, agricultural water management, and water resource policy-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 113836"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25007666","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Water resource optimization allocation is essential for maintaining ecological balance, promoting economic development, and ensuring social stability within river basins. However, many existing studies treated ecological water requirements as static baselines in allocation models, failing to address the dynamic utilization of water resources efficiently under varying hydrological conditions. In the Tao’er River Basin, a typical semiarid river basin, the combined effects of climate change and human activities have led to a severe imbalance between water supply and demand, particularly in regard to the competition between ecological water replenishment for the Xianghai Wetland, agricultural irrigation, and social water use. There is an urgent need for optimized water resource allocation to ensure the coordinated and sustainable development of these sectors. In this study, we developed the WEP-L model, a coupled natural–societal system, using various ecohydrological monitoring data to analyze the water supply–demand balance under different hydrological conditions. We proposed an allocation plan that considers ecological marginal benefits, agricultural needs, and water use guarantees: 1.04 × 108 m3 for ecological supplementation and 5.16 × 108 m3 for agricultural water in the flat year, adjusted to 0.94 × 108 m3 and 3.60 × 108 m3 in the dry year, respectively. Furthermore, by incorporating reservoir water supply rules into the WEP-L model, we simulated the feasibility of intra-annual water allocation. The proposed allocation scheme concentrates ecological water in spring during flat years and distributes it at a ratio of 80 % in spring and 20 % in autumn during dry years. This study emphasizes the dynamic adjustment of ecological water resources on the basis of environmental conditions and societal needs, aiming to maximize ecological and social benefits. It provides scientific support for optimizing ecological water allocation and offers practical guidance for wetland conservation, agricultural water management, and water resource policy-making.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.