Harder, better, faster, but more fatigued: The impact of multitasking on videoconferences, performance and fatigue

IF 5.8 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Y. Frontzkowski, A. Krick, J. Felfe
{"title":"Harder, better, faster, but more fatigued: The impact of multitasking on videoconferences, performance and fatigue","authors":"Y. Frontzkowski,&nbsp;A. Krick,&nbsp;J. Felfe","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research examines the impact of multitasking (MT) during videoconferences (VC) on videoconference fatigue (VF) and task performance. Drawing on dual-task interference and cognitive load theories, we investigated whether simultaneously engaging in secondary tasks (e.g., correcting texts) during online meetings contributes to VF, reduces objective task performance, and alters subjective performance. In two complementary studies – one 2 × 2 experimental (N = 94) and one longitudinal (N = 106) – we assessed VF across its general, emotional, motivational, social, and visual dimensions, as well as objective and subjective performance outcomes. In the experimental study, participants assigned to multitask during a VC exhibited significantly greater increases in general, motivational, emotional, social, and visual fatigue from pre-to post-measures, and significantly poorer objective performance on a note-taking and a text-correction task. Contrary to expectations, participants who multitasked did not rate their subjective performance more favorably; they rated their subjective performance slightly lower when multitasking. Moreover, multitasking during the VC strongly decreased the actual objective performance and raises the question, if people see the downside of multitasking, but underestimate its effect?</div><div>The longitudinal study reinforced the findings of MT on VF by demonstrating that higher levels of multitasking intensity in recurring online seminars were associated with increases in general, motivational, emotional, and social fatigue. The relationship with visual fatigue was not significant. Taken together, these results suggest that multitasking in videoconferences is a behavioral stressor that intensifies cognitive demands, resulting in more pronounced VF across multiple dimensions and diminished task accuracy. Organizations and leadership should focus on increasing VC effectiveness and reducing employees’ needs for multitasking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100736"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958825001514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research examines the impact of multitasking (MT) during videoconferences (VC) on videoconference fatigue (VF) and task performance. Drawing on dual-task interference and cognitive load theories, we investigated whether simultaneously engaging in secondary tasks (e.g., correcting texts) during online meetings contributes to VF, reduces objective task performance, and alters subjective performance. In two complementary studies – one 2 × 2 experimental (N = 94) and one longitudinal (N = 106) – we assessed VF across its general, emotional, motivational, social, and visual dimensions, as well as objective and subjective performance outcomes. In the experimental study, participants assigned to multitask during a VC exhibited significantly greater increases in general, motivational, emotional, social, and visual fatigue from pre-to post-measures, and significantly poorer objective performance on a note-taking and a text-correction task. Contrary to expectations, participants who multitasked did not rate their subjective performance more favorably; they rated their subjective performance slightly lower when multitasking. Moreover, multitasking during the VC strongly decreased the actual objective performance and raises the question, if people see the downside of multitasking, but underestimate its effect?
The longitudinal study reinforced the findings of MT on VF by demonstrating that higher levels of multitasking intensity in recurring online seminars were associated with increases in general, motivational, emotional, and social fatigue. The relationship with visual fatigue was not significant. Taken together, these results suggest that multitasking in videoconferences is a behavioral stressor that intensifies cognitive demands, resulting in more pronounced VF across multiple dimensions and diminished task accuracy. Organizations and leadership should focus on increasing VC effectiveness and reducing employees’ needs for multitasking.
更难、更好、更快,但更疲劳:多任务处理对视频会议、表现和疲劳的影响
本研究探讨了视像会议(VC)中多任务处理(MT)对视像会议疲劳(VF)和任务绩效的影响。利用双任务干扰和认知负荷理论,我们研究了在线会议期间同时从事次要任务(如批改文本)是否会导致VF,降低客观任务绩效,并改变主观绩效。在两项互补研究中——一项2 × 2实验研究(N = 94)和一项纵向研究(N = 106)——我们评估了VF的一般、情感、动机、社会和视觉维度,以及客观和主观表现结果。在实验研究中,被分配多任务的参与者在测试前和测试后表现出明显更大的一般疲劳、动机疲劳、情感疲劳、社交疲劳和视觉疲劳,而在记笔记和文本修改任务上的客观表现则明显更差。与预期相反,多任务处理的参与者并没有更积极地评价自己的主观表现;在多任务处理时,他们对自己主观表现的评价略低。此外,VC过程中的多任务处理严重降低了实际客观表现,并提出了一个问题,如果人们看到了多任务处理的缺点,但低估了它的效果?纵向研究强化了MT对VF的研究结果,表明在反复出现的在线研讨会中,高水平的多任务强度与一般疲劳、动机疲劳、情感疲劳和社交疲劳的增加有关。与视疲劳的关系不显著。综上所述,这些结果表明,视频会议中的多任务处理是一种强化认知需求的行为压力源,导致多个维度上更明显的VF和任务准确性降低。组织和领导应该把重点放在提高风险投资的有效性和减少员工对多任务处理的需求上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信