Anarchism, anti-militarism, and the British Empire: the case of war commentary and the freedom defence committee.

Eleanor Strangways
{"title":"Anarchism, anti-militarism, and the British Empire: the case of war commentary and the freedom defence committee.","authors":"Eleanor Strangways","doi":"10.1093/tcbh/hwaf006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anti-imperialism was central to the anarchist critique of the Second World War. Throughout the war, the anarchist publication War Commentary became a platform for challenging the British Empire and garnered the active involvement of key anti-imperialist thinkers such as Jomo Kenyatta and Chris Jones. George Padmore, another notable anti-imperialist in this period, was on the board of the Freedom Defence Committee (FDC)-established in 1945 to defend the arrested editors of War Commentary-an organization that would later become a springboard for anti-imperial solidarity. Through an analysis of the publication War Commentary and relations with the FDC, this article highlights the often-overlooked convergence of anti-imperialism and anarchism during and immediately after the Second World War. It begins with the domestic intellectual context, demonstrating how anti-imperialism was at the heart of the anarchist rejection of the war, and how this stance was influenced by anti-imperial actors from the colonies. Additionally, it reveals how these networks developed in the British Empire through a focus on the FDC's connections with Ghana. In doing so, this article will reveal how anarchist responses to the Second World War contributed to connections between anarchist groups in Britain and anti-imperialist groups in the colonies, while also highlighting the growing disillusionment of colonized activists with these alliances.</p>","PeriodicalId":520090,"journal":{"name":"Modern British history","volume":"36 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern British history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tcbh/hwaf006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anti-imperialism was central to the anarchist critique of the Second World War. Throughout the war, the anarchist publication War Commentary became a platform for challenging the British Empire and garnered the active involvement of key anti-imperialist thinkers such as Jomo Kenyatta and Chris Jones. George Padmore, another notable anti-imperialist in this period, was on the board of the Freedom Defence Committee (FDC)-established in 1945 to defend the arrested editors of War Commentary-an organization that would later become a springboard for anti-imperial solidarity. Through an analysis of the publication War Commentary and relations with the FDC, this article highlights the often-overlooked convergence of anti-imperialism and anarchism during and immediately after the Second World War. It begins with the domestic intellectual context, demonstrating how anti-imperialism was at the heart of the anarchist rejection of the war, and how this stance was influenced by anti-imperial actors from the colonies. Additionally, it reveals how these networks developed in the British Empire through a focus on the FDC's connections with Ghana. In doing so, this article will reveal how anarchist responses to the Second World War contributed to connections between anarchist groups in Britain and anti-imperialist groups in the colonies, while also highlighting the growing disillusionment of colonized activists with these alliances.

无政府主义、反军国主义和大英帝国:以战争评论和捍卫自由委员会为例。
反帝国主义是无政府主义者对第二次世界大战的批判的核心。在整个战争期间,无政府主义刊物《战争评论》成为挑战大英帝国的平台,并吸引了乔莫·肯雅塔和克里斯·琼斯等反帝国主义思想家的积极参与。乔治·帕德莫尔是这一时期另一位著名的反帝国主义者,他是自由保卫委员会(FDC)的董事会成员。自由保卫委员会成立于1945年,目的是为被捕的《战争评论》编辑辩护,该组织后来成为反帝国主义团结的跳板。通过对《战争评论》(War Commentary)刊物的分析以及与FDC的关系,本文强调了反帝国主义和无政府主义在第二次世界大战期间和之后不久经常被忽视的趋同。它从国内的知识背景开始,展示了反帝国主义是无政府主义者拒绝战争的核心,以及这种立场是如何受到殖民地反帝国主义行动者的影响的。此外,它还通过关注FDC与加纳的联系,揭示了这些网络在大英帝国是如何发展的。在此过程中,本文将揭示无政府主义者对第二次世界大战的反应如何促成了英国无政府主义团体与殖民地反帝国主义团体之间的联系,同时也强调了殖民地活动家对这些联盟的日益幻灭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信