Maternal cardiac arrhythmia in congenital heart disease: identifying high-risk pregnancy indicators.

Hongwei Li, Qian Yin, Zhenbo Ouyang, Yanli Liu
{"title":"Maternal cardiac arrhythmia in congenital heart disease: identifying high-risk pregnancy indicators.","authors":"Hongwei Li, Qian Yin, Zhenbo Ouyang, Yanli Liu","doi":"10.1080/00325481.2025.2529771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The onset of arrhythmia during pregnancy has been noted as a significant issue in clinical management of adult congenital heart disease. The authors sought to examine the actual incidence of arrhythmias in CHD patients during pregnancy, as well as to distinguish prognostic predictors of arrhythmia in CHD pregnant patients, specifically focusing on the predictive value of echocardiographic parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study involved 244 pregnant patients with CHD in a tertiary hospital. Baseline characteristics and clinical presentation were systemically compared between the arrhythmia group and no arrhythmia group. Univariate analyses were performed to identify baseline characteristics and hemodynamic parameters associated with outcomes. Subsequent multivariate logistic regression model identified the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% CI to pinpoint the independent risk factors of arrhythmia in CHD pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of arrhythmia in CHD patients during pregnancy was 17.6% (43/244). The arrhythmia group had more parity than the no arrhythmia group (0.72 vs 0.43, <i>p</i> = 0.010). Compared with the no arrhythmia group, the arrhythmia group's QRS duration was longer (105.1 ± 24.7 vs 93.6 ± 18.1 ms, <i>p</i> = 0.001). Patients with arrhythmia had both larger atrium size than patients without arrhythmia (right atrium: 51.0 ± 9.1 vs 47.4 ± 7.0 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.005; left atrium: 38.8 ± 7.6 vs 34.4 ± 4.8 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.000) respectively. Left ventricle end systolic volume in CHD patients with arrhythmia were considered larger than those without arrhythmia (29.9 ± 6.7 vs 27.7 ± 4.0 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.007), while not in left ventricle end diastolic volume (46.6 ± 9.2 vs 44.7 ± 5.2 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.067). The arrhythmia group were more likely to be presented with atrioventricular valve regurgitation (53.5% vs 15.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.000) than the no arrhythmia group. Multivariate logistic regression identified parity (aOR:1.895[95%CI: 1.033-3.478]), left atrium size (aOR:1.089[95%CI: 1.008-1.175]), and moderate atrioventricular valve regurgitation (aOR:3.317[95%CI: 1.272-8.647]) as independent contributors for arrhythmia during CHD pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early identification of risk factors that may predispose to arrhythmias favorably impacts long-term arrhythmia incidence and maternal neonatal outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":94176,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2025.2529771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The onset of arrhythmia during pregnancy has been noted as a significant issue in clinical management of adult congenital heart disease. The authors sought to examine the actual incidence of arrhythmias in CHD patients during pregnancy, as well as to distinguish prognostic predictors of arrhythmia in CHD pregnant patients, specifically focusing on the predictive value of echocardiographic parameters.

Methods: This retrospective study involved 244 pregnant patients with CHD in a tertiary hospital. Baseline characteristics and clinical presentation were systemically compared between the arrhythmia group and no arrhythmia group. Univariate analyses were performed to identify baseline characteristics and hemodynamic parameters associated with outcomes. Subsequent multivariate logistic regression model identified the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% CI to pinpoint the independent risk factors of arrhythmia in CHD pregnancy.

Results: The prevalence of arrhythmia in CHD patients during pregnancy was 17.6% (43/244). The arrhythmia group had more parity than the no arrhythmia group (0.72 vs 0.43, p = 0.010). Compared with the no arrhythmia group, the arrhythmia group's QRS duration was longer (105.1 ± 24.7 vs 93.6 ± 18.1 ms, p = 0.001). Patients with arrhythmia had both larger atrium size than patients without arrhythmia (right atrium: 51.0 ± 9.1 vs 47.4 ± 7.0 mm, p = 0.005; left atrium: 38.8 ± 7.6 vs 34.4 ± 4.8 mm, p = 0.000) respectively. Left ventricle end systolic volume in CHD patients with arrhythmia were considered larger than those without arrhythmia (29.9 ± 6.7 vs 27.7 ± 4.0 mm, p = 0.007), while not in left ventricle end diastolic volume (46.6 ± 9.2 vs 44.7 ± 5.2 mm, p = 0.067). The arrhythmia group were more likely to be presented with atrioventricular valve regurgitation (53.5% vs 15.4%, p = 0.000) than the no arrhythmia group. Multivariate logistic regression identified parity (aOR:1.895[95%CI: 1.033-3.478]), left atrium size (aOR:1.089[95%CI: 1.008-1.175]), and moderate atrioventricular valve regurgitation (aOR:3.317[95%CI: 1.272-8.647]) as independent contributors for arrhythmia during CHD pregnancy.

Conclusion: Early identification of risk factors that may predispose to arrhythmias favorably impacts long-term arrhythmia incidence and maternal neonatal outcome.

先天性心脏病产妇心律失常:确定高危妊娠指标。
背景:妊娠期心律失常的发生已被认为是成人先天性心脏病临床治疗中的一个重要问题。作者试图研究妊娠期冠心病患者心律失常的实际发生率,并区分妊娠期冠心病患者心律失常的预后预测因素,特别关注超声心动图参数的预测价值。方法:对某三级医院244例妊娠冠心病患者进行回顾性研究。系统比较心律失常组和无心律失常组的基线特征和临床表现。进行单变量分析以确定与结果相关的基线特征和血流动力学参数。随后的多因素logistic回归模型确定了校正优势比(aOR)和95% CI,以确定冠心病妊娠期心律失常的独立危险因素。结果:妊娠期冠心病患者心律失常发生率为17.6%(43/244)。心律失常组的胎次比无心律失常组多(0.72 vs 0.43, p = 0.010)。与无心律失常组相比,心律失常组QRS持续时间更长(105.1±24.7 ms vs 93.6±18.1 ms, p = 0.001)。心律失常患者心房大小均大于无心律失常患者(右心房:51.0±9.1 vs 47.4±7.0 mm, p = 0.005;左心房:38.8±7.6 mm vs 34.4±4.8 mm, p = 0.000)。合并心律失常的冠心病患者左心室收缩末期容积大于无心律失常的冠心病患者(29.9±6.7 vs 27.7±4.0 mm, p = 0.007),而左心室舒张末期容积小于无心律失常的冠心病患者(46.6±9.2 vs 44.7±5.2 mm, p = 0.067)。心律失常组比无心律失常组更容易出现房室瓣膜返流(53.5% vs 15.4%, p = 0.000)。多因素logistic回归发现胎次(aOR:1.895[95%CI: 1.033-3.478])、左心房大小(aOR:1.089[95%CI: 1.008-1.175])和中度房室瓣膜返流(aOR:3.317[95%CI: 1.72 -8.647])是冠心病妊娠期心律失常的独立影响因素。结论:早期识别可能诱发心律失常的危险因素有利于影响长期心律失常发生率和母婴预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信