{"title":"Outcomes of postoperative preemptive sedation in the intensive care unit for geriatric patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy.","authors":"Wei-Ting Kuo, Chen-Yuan Hsiao, Shu-Cheng Chou, Ching-Shu Chiang, Tien-Hua Chen, Chi-Hung Lin, Pei-Jiun Tsai","doi":"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastric cancer is a common malignancies worldwide, especially in East Asia. However, the increasing age is an independent risk factor associated with high operative complications and surgical mortality in radical gastrectomy. To improve the prognosis of surgery, we proposed strategic postoperative sedation for geriatric patients with gastric cancer undergoing radical gastrectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 324 gastric cancer patients, more than 75 years of age who underwent open radical gastrectomy at Taipei Veterans General Hospital between 2006 and 2020 were enrolled. The patients were classified into the sedation group (preemptive light sedation with prolonged mechanical ventilation assistance for the first five days postoperatively in the intensive care unit, n=53) and the control group (early extubation, received morphine for pain control but no postoperative sedatives in the ordinary ward, n=271). We compared the two groups' baseline clinical characteristics and the associated surgical outcome. We also conducted in vitro cell experiment with RAW 264.7 macrophage cell line and evaluated the cell performance in various concentrations of sedation drug Propofol and dexmedetomidine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the sedation group has significantly lower postoperative complication rates (13.7% v.s. 29.9%, p = 0.031). Among overall postoperative complications, the incidence rate of pulmonary events was significantly lower in the sedation group. Moreover, the incidence of other complications, including cardiac events, intra-abdominal abscesses, anastomotic leakage, adynamic ileus, and wound infection, were slightly higher in the matched control group without a statistically significant difference. Regarding surgical mortality rate and postoperative hospital length of stay LOS, there were no significant differences between the two groups. For in vitro cell experiments with RAW 264.7 macrophage cell line, propofol or dexmedetomidine significantly decreased TNF-α production.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For elderly patients with gastric cancer who undergo open radical gastrectomy, strategic postoperative sedation is safe and may reduce the incidence of pulmonary complications without prolonging hospital LOS.</p>","PeriodicalId":94115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Gastric cancer is a common malignancies worldwide, especially in East Asia. However, the increasing age is an independent risk factor associated with high operative complications and surgical mortality in radical gastrectomy. To improve the prognosis of surgery, we proposed strategic postoperative sedation for geriatric patients with gastric cancer undergoing radical gastrectomy.
Methods: A total of 324 gastric cancer patients, more than 75 years of age who underwent open radical gastrectomy at Taipei Veterans General Hospital between 2006 and 2020 were enrolled. The patients were classified into the sedation group (preemptive light sedation with prolonged mechanical ventilation assistance for the first five days postoperatively in the intensive care unit, n=53) and the control group (early extubation, received morphine for pain control but no postoperative sedatives in the ordinary ward, n=271). We compared the two groups' baseline clinical characteristics and the associated surgical outcome. We also conducted in vitro cell experiment with RAW 264.7 macrophage cell line and evaluated the cell performance in various concentrations of sedation drug Propofol and dexmedetomidine.
Results: Patients in the sedation group has significantly lower postoperative complication rates (13.7% v.s. 29.9%, p = 0.031). Among overall postoperative complications, the incidence rate of pulmonary events was significantly lower in the sedation group. Moreover, the incidence of other complications, including cardiac events, intra-abdominal abscesses, anastomotic leakage, adynamic ileus, and wound infection, were slightly higher in the matched control group without a statistically significant difference. Regarding surgical mortality rate and postoperative hospital length of stay LOS, there were no significant differences between the two groups. For in vitro cell experiments with RAW 264.7 macrophage cell line, propofol or dexmedetomidine significantly decreased TNF-α production.
Conclusion: For elderly patients with gastric cancer who undergo open radical gastrectomy, strategic postoperative sedation is safe and may reduce the incidence of pulmonary complications without prolonging hospital LOS.
背景:胃癌是世界范围内常见的恶性肿瘤,尤其是在东亚地区。然而,年龄的增长是胃癌根治术高手术并发症和手术死亡率的独立危险因素。为了改善手术预后,我们建议老年胃癌根治术患者术后策略性镇静。方法:选取2006年至2020年在台北荣民总医院行开放性根治性胃切除术的75岁以上胃癌患者324例。将患者分为镇静组(重症监护室术后前5天先发制人轻度镇静并延长机械通气辅助,n=53)和对照组(普通病房早期拔管,吗啡镇痛,术后未使用镇静剂,n=271)。我们比较了两组的基线临床特征和相关的手术结果。我们还对RAW 264.7巨噬细胞细胞系进行了体外细胞实验,评估了不同浓度镇静药物异丙酚和右美托咪定对巨噬细胞的作用。结果:镇静组患者术后并发症发生率明显低于镇静组(13.7% vs 29.9%, p = 0.031)。在术后总并发症中,镇静组肺部事件发生率明显较低。此外,其他并发症的发生率,包括心脏事件、腹内脓肿、吻合口漏、动力性肠梗阻、伤口感染,在匹配的对照组中略高,但差异无统计学意义。在手术死亡率和术后住院时间方面,两组间差异无统计学意义。在RAW 264.7巨噬细胞系的体外细胞实验中,异丙酚或右美托咪定显著降低TNF-α的产生。结论:高龄胃癌患者行开放式根治术,术后策略镇静是安全的,可减少肺部并发症的发生,且不会延长住院时间。