{"title":"Team Objective Structured Bedside Assessment (TOSBA) in Paediatric Undergraduate Students.","authors":"Heena Rais, Azam Saeed Afzal, Amber Shamim Sultan, Farhana Zafar","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2025.07.897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a team objective structured bedside assessment (TOSBA) tool for assessing the paediatric undergraduate students' clinical skills at the bedside.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A validation, cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Paediatrics, Ziauddin Medical University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan, from March to June, 2023.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Three groups of 4th-year students (n = 61) at Ziauddin Medical University underwent this formative assessment process 4-5 times during a 4-week rotation. Psychometric analysis for reliability was done by calculating the internal consistency and item-total correlation of TOSBA scores. At the same time, validity was determined by correlating TOSBA scores with the end-of-rotation objective structured clinical evaluation (OSCE) scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The TOSBA tool's overall reliability was good, with Cronbach's alpha values >0.7 for all clinical skills assessed. Spearman's correlation revealed r2 >0.4 (p <0.001) for history taking and clinical reasoning. Item-total correlation varied across stations, occasionally falling below 0.7. Strong correlations (0.46 to 0.73, p <0.001) were observed between similar constructs. The multi-trait-multi-method matrix highlighted divergent validity, showing no or negative correlations within the same method (TOSBA or OSCE), except for physical examination, which differed from OSCE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TOSBA tool developed for formative assessment of undergraduate paediatric students is a reliable and moderately valid tool for formative assessment of undergraduate students.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Objective structured clinical evaluation, Reliability, Team objective structured bedside assessment, Undergraduate students, Validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":94116,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","volume":"35 7","pages":"897-903"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2025.07.897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To develop a team objective structured bedside assessment (TOSBA) tool for assessing the paediatric undergraduate students' clinical skills at the bedside.
Study design: A validation, cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Paediatrics, Ziauddin Medical University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan, from March to June, 2023.
Methodology: Three groups of 4th-year students (n = 61) at Ziauddin Medical University underwent this formative assessment process 4-5 times during a 4-week rotation. Psychometric analysis for reliability was done by calculating the internal consistency and item-total correlation of TOSBA scores. At the same time, validity was determined by correlating TOSBA scores with the end-of-rotation objective structured clinical evaluation (OSCE) scores.
Results: The TOSBA tool's overall reliability was good, with Cronbach's alpha values >0.7 for all clinical skills assessed. Spearman's correlation revealed r2 >0.4 (p <0.001) for history taking and clinical reasoning. Item-total correlation varied across stations, occasionally falling below 0.7. Strong correlations (0.46 to 0.73, p <0.001) were observed between similar constructs. The multi-trait-multi-method matrix highlighted divergent validity, showing no or negative correlations within the same method (TOSBA or OSCE), except for physical examination, which differed from OSCE.
Conclusion: The TOSBA tool developed for formative assessment of undergraduate paediatric students is a reliable and moderately valid tool for formative assessment of undergraduate students.