Team Objective Structured Bedside Assessment (TOSBA) in Paediatric Undergraduate Students.

Heena Rais, Azam Saeed Afzal, Amber Shamim Sultan, Farhana Zafar
{"title":"Team Objective Structured Bedside Assessment (TOSBA) in Paediatric Undergraduate Students.","authors":"Heena Rais, Azam Saeed Afzal, Amber Shamim Sultan, Farhana Zafar","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2025.07.897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a team objective structured bedside assessment (TOSBA) tool for assessing the paediatric undergraduate students' clinical skills at the bedside.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A validation, cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Paediatrics, Ziauddin Medical University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan, from March to June, 2023.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Three groups of 4th-year students (n = 61) at Ziauddin Medical University underwent this formative assessment process 4-5 times during a 4-week rotation. Psychometric analysis for reliability was done by calculating the internal consistency and item-total correlation of TOSBA scores. At the same time, validity was determined by correlating TOSBA scores with the end-of-rotation objective structured clinical evaluation (OSCE) scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The TOSBA tool's overall reliability was good, with Cronbach's alpha values >0.7 for all clinical skills assessed. Spearman's correlation revealed r2 >0.4 (p <0.001) for history taking and clinical reasoning. Item-total correlation varied across stations, occasionally falling below 0.7. Strong correlations (0.46 to 0.73, p <0.001) were observed between similar constructs. The multi-trait-multi-method matrix highlighted divergent validity, showing no or negative correlations within the same method (TOSBA or OSCE), except for physical examination, which differed from OSCE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TOSBA tool developed for formative assessment of undergraduate paediatric students is a reliable and moderately valid tool for formative assessment of undergraduate students.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Objective structured clinical evaluation, Reliability, Team objective structured bedside assessment, Undergraduate students, Validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":94116,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","volume":"35 7","pages":"897-903"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2025.07.897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop a team objective structured bedside assessment (TOSBA) tool for assessing the paediatric undergraduate students' clinical skills at the bedside.

Study design: A validation, cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Paediatrics, Ziauddin Medical University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan, from March to June, 2023.

Methodology: Three groups of 4th-year students (n = 61) at Ziauddin Medical University underwent this formative assessment process 4-5 times during a 4-week rotation. Psychometric analysis for reliability was done by calculating the internal consistency and item-total correlation of TOSBA scores. At the same time, validity was determined by correlating TOSBA scores with the end-of-rotation objective structured clinical evaluation (OSCE) scores.

Results: The TOSBA tool's overall reliability was good, with Cronbach's alpha values >0.7 for all clinical skills assessed. Spearman's correlation revealed r2 >0.4 (p <0.001) for history taking and clinical reasoning. Item-total correlation varied across stations, occasionally falling below 0.7. Strong correlations (0.46 to 0.73, p <0.001) were observed between similar constructs. The multi-trait-multi-method matrix highlighted divergent validity, showing no or negative correlations within the same method (TOSBA or OSCE), except for physical examination, which differed from OSCE.

Conclusion: The TOSBA tool developed for formative assessment of undergraduate paediatric students is a reliable and moderately valid tool for formative assessment of undergraduate students.

Key words: Objective structured clinical evaluation, Reliability, Team objective structured bedside assessment, Undergraduate students, Validity.

儿科本科学生的结构化床边评估(TOSBA)。
目的:开发一种团队目标结构化床边评估(TOSBA)工具,用于评估儿科本科生床边临床技能。研究设计:验证性横断面研究。研究地点和时间:2023年3月至6月,巴基斯坦卡拉奇Ziauddin医科大学医院儿科。方法:Ziauddin医科大学的三组四年级学生(n = 61)在4周的轮换中进行了4-5次形成性评估过程。通过计算TOSBA评分的内部一致性和项目-总相关性进行信度的心理测量分析。同时,通过将TOSBA评分与轮转结束时客观结构化临床评价(OSCE)评分相关联来确定有效性。结果:TOSBA工具的总体可靠性良好,所有临床技能评估的Cronbach alpha值为>0.7。结论:开发的TOSBA工具用于儿科本科学生形成性评价是一种可靠的、中等效度的工具。关键词:客观结构化临床评价;信度;团队客观结构化床边评估;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信