Generative AI in healthcare: challenges to patient agency and ethical implications.

IF 3.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in digital health Pub Date : 2025-06-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1524553
Scott A Holmes, Vanda Faria, Eric A Moulton
{"title":"Generative AI in healthcare: challenges to patient agency and ethical implications.","authors":"Scott A Holmes, Vanda Faria, Eric A Moulton","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1524553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical research is no longer a monopolistic environment wherein patients and participants are the sole voice of information. The introduction and acceleration of AI-based methods in healthcare is creating a complex environment where human-derived data is no longer the sole mechanism through which researchers and clinicians explore and test their hypotheses. The concept of self-agency is intimately tied into this, as generative data does not encompass the same person-lived experiences as human-derived data. The lack of accountability and transparency in recognizing data sources supporting medical and research decisions has the potential to immediately and negatively impact patient care. This commentary considers how self-agency is being confronted by the introduction and proliferation of generative AI, and discusses future directions to improve, rather than undermine AI-fueled healthcare progress.</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1524553"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12213482/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1524553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical research is no longer a monopolistic environment wherein patients and participants are the sole voice of information. The introduction and acceleration of AI-based methods in healthcare is creating a complex environment where human-derived data is no longer the sole mechanism through which researchers and clinicians explore and test their hypotheses. The concept of self-agency is intimately tied into this, as generative data does not encompass the same person-lived experiences as human-derived data. The lack of accountability and transparency in recognizing data sources supporting medical and research decisions has the potential to immediately and negatively impact patient care. This commentary considers how self-agency is being confronted by the introduction and proliferation of generative AI, and discusses future directions to improve, rather than undermine AI-fueled healthcare progress.

医疗保健中的生成式人工智能:对患者代理和伦理影响的挑战。
临床研究不再是一个垄断的环境,患者和参与者是唯一的信息声音。基于人工智能的方法在医疗保健领域的引入和加速正在创造一个复杂的环境,在这个环境中,来自人类的数据不再是研究人员和临床医生探索和测试其假设的唯一机制。自我代理的概念与此密切相关,因为生成数据不包含与人类衍生数据相同的个人生活经验。在确认支持医疗和研究决策的数据来源方面缺乏问责制和透明度,有可能立即对患者护理产生负面影响。这篇评论考虑了自我代理如何面对生成式人工智能的引入和扩散,并讨论了未来的方向,以改善而不是破坏人工智能推动的医疗保健进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信