Science at the Secretariat of the International Seabed Authority: post-normal science for recalibration of policy instruments.

Open research Europe Pub Date : 2025-02-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/openreseurope.18879.2
Aistė Klimašauskaitė, Paul Dees, Silvio Oscar Funtowicz, Laura Elisabet Drivdal, Ola G Berta
{"title":"Science at the Secretariat of the International Seabed Authority: post-normal science for recalibration of policy instruments.","authors":"Aistė Klimašauskaitė, Paul Dees, Silvio Oscar Funtowicz, Laura Elisabet Drivdal, Ola G Berta","doi":"10.12688/openreseurope.18879.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Post-normal conditions require post-normal resolutions. When stakes are high and values are disputed, policy discussions and decisions cannot rely on science alone. Such discussions require <i>post-normal science</i>, which centralizes the qualitative value of diverse knowledge groups. In this essay we discuss the usefulness of post-normal science in the context of the Secretariat's work at the International Seabed Authority. In particular, we explore the need to expand the understanding of science and knowledge - key components informing deep-seabed policies. Marine science encompasses a broad range of research topics and interests - from blue humanities with analyses of human-Ocean relations, to physics of particulate matter, to marine policy research. The growing number of disciplines applied to marine science demonstrates our increasing collective knowledge of the Ocean and, in turn, our appreciation of knowledge limitations. Such knowledge challenges are discussed among natural and social scientists. The Secretariat depends on broad expertise, from natural sciences, social sciences, civil society and beyond. In sum, our thesis is the following: we argue that <i>post-normal science</i> can help metaphorically recalibrate policy-shaping instruments (the practice) so that decision-making processes and policy agendas are implemented for transformative actions.</p>","PeriodicalId":74359,"journal":{"name":"Open research Europe","volume":"4 ","pages":"252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12219538/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open research Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.18879.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Post-normal conditions require post-normal resolutions. When stakes are high and values are disputed, policy discussions and decisions cannot rely on science alone. Such discussions require post-normal science, which centralizes the qualitative value of diverse knowledge groups. In this essay we discuss the usefulness of post-normal science in the context of the Secretariat's work at the International Seabed Authority. In particular, we explore the need to expand the understanding of science and knowledge - key components informing deep-seabed policies. Marine science encompasses a broad range of research topics and interests - from blue humanities with analyses of human-Ocean relations, to physics of particulate matter, to marine policy research. The growing number of disciplines applied to marine science demonstrates our increasing collective knowledge of the Ocean and, in turn, our appreciation of knowledge limitations. Such knowledge challenges are discussed among natural and social scientists. The Secretariat depends on broad expertise, from natural sciences, social sciences, civil society and beyond. In sum, our thesis is the following: we argue that post-normal science can help metaphorically recalibrate policy-shaping instruments (the practice) so that decision-making processes and policy agendas are implemented for transformative actions.

国际海底管理局秘书处的科学:重新校准政策工具的后常态科学。
后正常状况需要后正常决议。当利害关系重大、价值观存在争议时,政策讨论和决策不能仅仅依靠科学。这样的讨论需要后常态科学,它集中了不同知识群体的定性价值。在本文中,我们将讨论在秘书处在国际海底管理局工作的背景下正常后科学的有用性。我们特别探讨了扩大对科学和知识的理解的必要性,这是为深海海底政策提供信息的关键组成部分。海洋科学涵盖了广泛的研究课题和兴趣——从蓝色人文与人与海洋关系的分析,到微粒物质的物理学,再到海洋政策研究。应用于海洋科学的学科越来越多,表明我们对海洋的集体知识越来越多,反过来,也表明我们对知识局限性的认识。这些知识挑战在自然和社会科学家之间进行了讨论。秘书处依靠来自自然科学、社会科学、民间社会和其他领域的广泛专门知识。总而言之,我们的论点如下:我们认为,后常态科学可以帮助隐喻地重新校准政策制定工具(实践),以便为变革行动实施决策过程和政策议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信