Bronchial Blockers versus Double-Lumen Endotracheal Tubes: Impact on Postoperative Pneumonia in Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery - A Propensity Score-Matched Study.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-06-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S521884
Xiaoxi Li, Ling Yu, Jiaonan Yang, Jin Wei, Miao Fu, Hongyu Tan
{"title":"Bronchial Blockers versus Double-Lumen Endotracheal Tubes: Impact on Postoperative Pneumonia in Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery - A Propensity Score-Matched Study.","authors":"Xiaoxi Li, Ling Yu, Jiaonan Yang, Jin Wei, Miao Fu, Hongyu Tan","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S521884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the differential effects of bronchial blockers (BBs) versus double-lumen endotracheal tubes (DLETs) on postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed patients undergoing VATS requiring one-lung ventilation under general anesthesia from April 2023 to August 2024. Lung isolation was achieved using either BBs with single-lumen endotracheal tubes or DLETs. Propensity score matching was implemented to mitigate differences in patients' baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was the incidence of PPCs during hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Propensity score matching resulted in 152 matched pairs of patients in the BB and DLET groups. The incidence rates of PPCs (6.6% vs 16.4%; <i>P</i> = 0.007) and pneumonia (3.9% vs 11.8%; <i>P</i> = 0.011) during hospitalization were significantly lower in the BB group than in the DLET group. Average oxygen saturation (<i>P</i> = 0.024), end-tidal carbon dioxide (<i>P</i> = 0.009), fraction of inspired oxygen (<i>P</i> = 0.010), and respiratory rate (<i>P</i> < 0.001) were significantly higher in the BB group. Mechanical ventilation parameters, including average peak airway pressure (<i>P</i> < 0.001), mean airway pressure (<i>P</i> < 0.001), and tidal volume (<i>P</i> = 0.003), were significantly lower in the BB group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with patients intubated using a DLET, patients with lung cancer undergoing VATS and intubated using a BB experienced a lower incidence of PPCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"2189-2199"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12219179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S521884","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the differential effects of bronchial blockers (BBs) versus double-lumen endotracheal tubes (DLETs) on postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lung cancer.

Patients and methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed patients undergoing VATS requiring one-lung ventilation under general anesthesia from April 2023 to August 2024. Lung isolation was achieved using either BBs with single-lumen endotracheal tubes or DLETs. Propensity score matching was implemented to mitigate differences in patients' baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was the incidence of PPCs during hospitalization.

Results: Propensity score matching resulted in 152 matched pairs of patients in the BB and DLET groups. The incidence rates of PPCs (6.6% vs 16.4%; P = 0.007) and pneumonia (3.9% vs 11.8%; P = 0.011) during hospitalization were significantly lower in the BB group than in the DLET group. Average oxygen saturation (P = 0.024), end-tidal carbon dioxide (P = 0.009), fraction of inspired oxygen (P = 0.010), and respiratory rate (P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the BB group. Mechanical ventilation parameters, including average peak airway pressure (P < 0.001), mean airway pressure (P < 0.001), and tidal volume (P = 0.003), were significantly lower in the BB group.

Conclusion: Compared with patients intubated using a DLET, patients with lung cancer undergoing VATS and intubated using a BB experienced a lower incidence of PPCs.

支气管阻滞剂与双腔气管插管:对接受电视胸腔镜手术的肺癌患者术后肺炎的影响——一项倾向评分匹配研究
目的:比较支气管阻滞剂(BBs)与双腔气管内管(dlet)对肺癌电视胸腔镜手术(VATS)患者术后肺部并发症(PPCs)的不同影响。患者和方法:本回顾性队列研究分析了2023年4月至2024年8月在全身麻醉下接受VATS需要单肺通气的患者。采用单腔气管内管或dlet进行肺隔离。采用倾向评分匹配来减轻患者基线特征的差异。主要观察指标是住院期间PPCs的发生率。结果:倾向评分匹配得到152对BB组和DLET组患者。PPCs的发病率(6.6% vs 16.4%;P = 0.007)和肺炎(3.9% vs 11.8%;P = 0.011), BB组在住院期间与DLET组相比显著降低。BB组平均血氧饱和度(P = 0.024)、末潮二氧化碳(P = 0.009)、吸入氧分数(P = 0.010)和呼吸频率(P < 0.001)均显著高于对照组。BB组机械通气参数平均峰值气道压力(P < 0.001)、平均气道压力(P < 0.001)、潮气量(P = 0.003)均显著降低。结论:与DLET插管的患者相比,VATS和BB插管的肺癌患者PPCs发生率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信