Retinal Displacement Following Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair: Scleral Buckling vs Pars Plana Vitrectomy (The BEVERLEY Study).

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Asterios Diafas, Sandra Gray, Heinrich Heimann, Yalin Zheng, Carl Groenewald, Ian Pearce, Shi Zhuan Tan, Paul Y Chua, Teresa Sandinha, Sofia Androudi, Anna-Bettina Haidich, Rumana N Hussain
{"title":"Retinal Displacement Following Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair: Scleral Buckling vs Pars Plana Vitrectomy (The BEVERLEY Study).","authors":"Asterios Diafas, Sandra Gray, Heinrich Heimann, Yalin Zheng, Carl Groenewald, Ian Pearce, Shi Zhuan Tan, Paul Y Chua, Teresa Sandinha, Sofia Androudi, Anna-Bettina Haidich, Rumana N Hussain","doi":"10.1097/IAE.0000000000004577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the retinal displacement and metamorphopsia in patients with primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) treated with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) or scleral buckling (SB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective non-randomized interventional study. A total of 107 patients were studied over a period of 6 months postoperatively. The vessel printing on the fundus autofluorescence (FAF) photos and the M-CHART were used to evaluate the retinal displacement and the metamorphopsia, respectively. We also assessed the vision-related quality of life, the postoperative visual acuity and the optical coherence tomographic (OCT) findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-five male and forty-two female patients were recruited in the study. The mean age was 54.8 years (SD 14.7, range 18-82). The proportion of eyes detected with retinal displacement at six months postoperatively was significantly lower in the SB group (4.3%) than in the PPV group (30.9%) (26.6% difference, 95% CI 13.1% - 40.1%, p<0.001). The SB group had significantly lower postoperative vertical and horizontal metamorphopsia (45.5% difference, 95% CI 28.3% - 62.7% p<0.001 and 38.2% difference 95% CI 20.7 % - 55.7%, p<0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference between the two study groups regarding the vision-related quality of life (1.19 difference, 95% CI -5.76, 7.70, p=0.783) and visual acuity (0.08 difference, 95% CI 0.00, 0.17, p=0.051).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although scleral buckling is not superior in visual acuity improvement and quality of life, it improves anatomical outcomes with less retinal displacement and functional outcomes with less metamorphopsia.</p>","PeriodicalId":54486,"journal":{"name":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000004577","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the retinal displacement and metamorphopsia in patients with primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) treated with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) or scleral buckling (SB).

Methods: This is a prospective non-randomized interventional study. A total of 107 patients were studied over a period of 6 months postoperatively. The vessel printing on the fundus autofluorescence (FAF) photos and the M-CHART were used to evaluate the retinal displacement and the metamorphopsia, respectively. We also assessed the vision-related quality of life, the postoperative visual acuity and the optical coherence tomographic (OCT) findings.

Results: Sixty-five male and forty-two female patients were recruited in the study. The mean age was 54.8 years (SD 14.7, range 18-82). The proportion of eyes detected with retinal displacement at six months postoperatively was significantly lower in the SB group (4.3%) than in the PPV group (30.9%) (26.6% difference, 95% CI 13.1% - 40.1%, p<0.001). The SB group had significantly lower postoperative vertical and horizontal metamorphopsia (45.5% difference, 95% CI 28.3% - 62.7% p<0.001 and 38.2% difference 95% CI 20.7 % - 55.7%, p<0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference between the two study groups regarding the vision-related quality of life (1.19 difference, 95% CI -5.76, 7.70, p=0.783) and visual acuity (0.08 difference, 95% CI 0.00, 0.17, p=0.051).

Conclusion: Although scleral buckling is not superior in visual acuity improvement and quality of life, it improves anatomical outcomes with less retinal displacement and functional outcomes with less metamorphopsia.

孔源性视网膜脱离修复后视网膜移位:巩膜屈曲与玻璃体切割(BEVERLEY研究)。
目的:探讨玻璃体切割(PPV)或巩膜扣带(SB)治疗原发性孔源性视网膜脱离(RRD)的视网膜移位和变形情况。方法:这是一项前瞻性非随机介入研究。术后6个月共对107例患者进行了研究。采用眼底自体荧光(FAF)和M-CHART分别评价视网膜移位和变形。我们还评估了视力相关的生活质量,术后视力和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)的结果。结果:65名男性患者和42名女性患者被纳入研究。平均年龄54.8岁(SD 14.7,范围18-82)。SB组术后6个月视网膜移位的比例(4.3%)明显低于PPV组(30.9%)(差异26.6%,95% CI 13.1% - 40.1%)。结论:巩膜扣带术虽然在改善视力和生活质量方面不占优,但能改善解剖结果,减少视网膜移位,改善功能结果,减少变形。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
554
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​RETINA® focuses exclusively on the growing specialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The Journal provides current information on diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. Its highly specialized and informative, peer-reviewed articles are easily applicable to clinical practice. In addition to regular reports from clinical and basic science investigators, RETINA® publishes special features including periodic review articles on pertinent topics, special articles dealing with surgical and other therapeutic techniques, and abstract cards. Issues are abundantly illustrated in vivid full color. Published 12 times per year, RETINA® is truly a “must have” publication for anyone connected to this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信