Effects of subjective driving workload on hazard perception performance in older drivers: A driving simulation study.

IF 1.6 3区 工程技术 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Yiwen Zhou, Fengxiang Guo, Xiaoan Wang, Jing Cai
{"title":"Effects of subjective driving workload on hazard perception performance in older drivers: A driving simulation study.","authors":"Yiwen Zhou, Fengxiang Guo, Xiaoan Wang, Jing Cai","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2025.2513398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this research was to explore the changes in eye movement characteristics, driving reaction, and operation performance of older drivers under different intersection conflict scenarios and to investigate the impact of subjective workload on hazard perception performance of older drivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A driving simulation experiment was conducted to simulate various intersection conflict risk scenarios, and data on driving behavior and visual characteristics were collected from 47 middle-aged and older drivers. The NASA-Task Load Index (TLX) scale was utilized to assess subjective workload across six dimensions: Mental Demands, Physical Demands, Temporal Demands, Own Performance, Effort, and Frustration. This study analyzed drivers' subjective workload, eye movement characteristics, driving responses, and performance under different conflict risk scenarios. The rank sum ratio method was employed for a comprehensive evaluation of subjective workload, categorizing participants into low-, moderate-, and high-workload groups. Differences in eye movement patterns, driving responses, and performance across these groups were subsequently examined. Furthermore, the XGBoost-SHAP model was applied to explore the impact of subjective workload on hazard perception performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results show significant differences in Mental Demands, Physical Demands, Temporal Demands, and Frustration levels between older drivers in different conflict scenarios (such as pedestrians, cars, and motorcycles), with lower subjective workload reported in car conflict scenarios compared to others. In motorcycle and pedestrian conflict scenarios, older drivers exhibited heightened visual alertness and attention, while their driving responses and operational behaviors were notably more cautious. Additionally, in left-turn scenarios, drivers displayed more frequent visual searches and driving maneuvers. As subjective workload increased, older drivers' average fixation time and scanning intensity in conflict risk areas showed a marked increase, while vertical eye movements and pupil diameter exhibited a downward trend. Simultaneously, indicators such as brake response time, average speed, steering wheel angle, lateral acceleration, and pedal opening and closing degree all showed a decreasing trend. Importantly, the analysis revealed that the three dimensions of Own Performance, Mental Demands, and Physical Demands in the subjective workload assessment positively influenced older drivers' hazard perception performance, with Own Performance having the greatest impact. In contrast, the effects of Effort and Frustration were relatively smaller, and Temporal Demands had the least influence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results show a significant association between driving subjective workload and hazard perception performance among older drivers. It is possible to consider how to utilize subjective workload assessment to identify drivers with poor hazard perception performance and potentially help older drivers improve driving safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2513398","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this research was to explore the changes in eye movement characteristics, driving reaction, and operation performance of older drivers under different intersection conflict scenarios and to investigate the impact of subjective workload on hazard perception performance of older drivers.

Methods: A driving simulation experiment was conducted to simulate various intersection conflict risk scenarios, and data on driving behavior and visual characteristics were collected from 47 middle-aged and older drivers. The NASA-Task Load Index (TLX) scale was utilized to assess subjective workload across six dimensions: Mental Demands, Physical Demands, Temporal Demands, Own Performance, Effort, and Frustration. This study analyzed drivers' subjective workload, eye movement characteristics, driving responses, and performance under different conflict risk scenarios. The rank sum ratio method was employed for a comprehensive evaluation of subjective workload, categorizing participants into low-, moderate-, and high-workload groups. Differences in eye movement patterns, driving responses, and performance across these groups were subsequently examined. Furthermore, the XGBoost-SHAP model was applied to explore the impact of subjective workload on hazard perception performance.

Results: The results show significant differences in Mental Demands, Physical Demands, Temporal Demands, and Frustration levels between older drivers in different conflict scenarios (such as pedestrians, cars, and motorcycles), with lower subjective workload reported in car conflict scenarios compared to others. In motorcycle and pedestrian conflict scenarios, older drivers exhibited heightened visual alertness and attention, while their driving responses and operational behaviors were notably more cautious. Additionally, in left-turn scenarios, drivers displayed more frequent visual searches and driving maneuvers. As subjective workload increased, older drivers' average fixation time and scanning intensity in conflict risk areas showed a marked increase, while vertical eye movements and pupil diameter exhibited a downward trend. Simultaneously, indicators such as brake response time, average speed, steering wheel angle, lateral acceleration, and pedal opening and closing degree all showed a decreasing trend. Importantly, the analysis revealed that the three dimensions of Own Performance, Mental Demands, and Physical Demands in the subjective workload assessment positively influenced older drivers' hazard perception performance, with Own Performance having the greatest impact. In contrast, the effects of Effort and Frustration were relatively smaller, and Temporal Demands had the least influence.

Conclusions: Results show a significant association between driving subjective workload and hazard perception performance among older drivers. It is possible to consider how to utilize subjective workload assessment to identify drivers with poor hazard perception performance and potentially help older drivers improve driving safety.

主观驾驶负荷对老年驾驶员危险感知表现的影响:驾驶模拟研究。
目的:探讨不同路口冲突情景下老年驾驶员眼动特征、驾驶反应和操作表现的变化,探讨主观工作量对老年驾驶员危险感知表现的影响。方法:进行驾驶模拟实验,模拟各种路口冲突风险场景,采集47名中老年驾驶员的驾驶行为和视觉特征数据。采用nasa任务负荷指数(TLX)量表对主观工作量进行心理需求、生理需求、时间需求、个人表现、努力程度和挫败感六个维度的评估。本研究分析了不同冲突风险情景下驾驶员的主观工作量、眼动特征、驾驶反应和表现。采用秩和比法对主观工作量进行综合评价,将被试分为低、中、高工作量组。随后,研究人员检查了这些组在眼动模式、驱动反应和表现方面的差异。此外,采用XGBoost-SHAP模型探讨主观工作量对危险感知绩效的影响。结果:不同冲突情景(行人、汽车和摩托车)中老年驾驶员的心理需求、身体需求、时间需求和沮丧程度存在显著差异,其中汽车冲突情景主观工作量较低。在摩托车和行人冲突场景中,老年驾驶员的视觉警觉性和注意力明显增强,驾驶反应和操作行为明显更加谨慎。此外,在左转的情况下,司机表现出更频繁的视觉搜索和驾驶动作。随着主观工作量的增加,老年驾驶员在冲突风险区域的平均注视时间和扫描强度显著增加,而垂直眼动和瞳孔直径呈下降趋势。同时,制动响应时间、平均车速、方向盘角度、横向加速度、踏板开合度等指标均呈下降趋势。研究发现,主观工作量评估中的“自身表现”、“心理需求”和“身体需求”三个维度对老年驾驶员的危险感知表现有正向影响,其中“自身表现”的影响最大。相反,努力和挫折的影响相对较小,时间需求的影响最小。结论:老年驾驶员主观驾驶负荷与危险感知表现存在显著相关性。可以考虑如何利用主观工作量评估来识别危险感知表现较差的驾驶员,并有可能帮助老年驾驶员提高驾驶安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Traffic Injury Prevention
Traffic Injury Prevention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment. General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信