Factors influencing healthcare practitioners' decision to offer (or not) the choice of self-collection cervical screening in general practice in Victoria, Australia.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Nicola S Creagh, Julia ML Brotherton, Jane S Hocking, Amalia Karahalios, Marion Saville, Megan A Smith, Karen Canfell, David Hawkes, Claire Nightingale
{"title":"Factors influencing healthcare practitioners' decision to offer (or not) the choice of self-collection cervical screening in general practice in Victoria, Australia.","authors":"Nicola S Creagh, Julia ML Brotherton, Jane S Hocking, Amalia Karahalios, Marion Saville, Megan A Smith, Karen Canfell, David Hawkes, Claire Nightingale","doi":"10.31128/AJGP-04-24-7229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>In July 2022, a policy change was enacted in the National Cervical Screening Program (NCSP) to allow all women and people with a cervix (hereafter people) the choice of a self-collected sample. This study aimed to understand healthcare practitioners' decisions, and factors related to, the provision (or not) of this change.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Semi-structured interviews (n=28) were conducted between February and July 2023 with general practitioners, nurses and practice managers. The COM-B model of behaviour change framework informed the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although most (n=22) interviewees reported that they, or healthcare practitioners at their practice, were providing a choice of self-collection to all, a minority (n=6) reported that either they (n=4) or their practice (n=2) were not. Factors that informed the selective provision of self-collection are reported.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>For self-collection to facilitate improved equity in the NCSP, strategies are needed to reassure healthcare practitioners that self-collection is an appropriate screening modality, and ensure people are aware of their screening choices.</p>","PeriodicalId":54241,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of General Practice","volume":"54 7","pages":"477-483"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-04-24-7229","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: In July 2022, a policy change was enacted in the National Cervical Screening Program (NCSP) to allow all women and people with a cervix (hereafter people) the choice of a self-collected sample. This study aimed to understand healthcare practitioners' decisions, and factors related to, the provision (or not) of this change.

Method: Semi-structured interviews (n=28) were conducted between February and July 2023 with general practitioners, nurses and practice managers. The COM-B model of behaviour change framework informed the analysis.

Results: Although most (n=22) interviewees reported that they, or healthcare practitioners at their practice, were providing a choice of self-collection to all, a minority (n=6) reported that either they (n=4) or their practice (n=2) were not. Factors that informed the selective provision of self-collection are reported.

Discussion: For self-collection to facilitate improved equity in the NCSP, strategies are needed to reassure healthcare practitioners that self-collection is an appropriate screening modality, and ensure people are aware of their screening choices.

影响保健医生决定提供(或不提供)自我收集子宫颈筛查的一般做法在维多利亚州,澳大利亚的因素。
背景和目的:2022年7月,国家子宫颈筛查计划(NCSP)颁布了一项政策变化,允许所有妇女和宫颈患者(以下简称人类)选择自行采集的样本。本研究旨在了解医疗保健从业者的决定,以及与提供(或不提供)这种变化相关的因素。方法:于2023年2月至7月对全科医生、护士和执业管理人员进行半结构化访谈(n=28)。行为改变框架的COM-B模型为分析提供了依据。结果:虽然大多数(n=22)受访者报告说,他们,或在他们的做法保健从业人员,提供一个选择的自我收集所有,少数(n=6)报告说,要么他们(n=4)或他们的做法(n=2)没有。报告了影响选择性提供自我收集的因素。讨论:自我收集,以促进提高公平在国家卫生服务计划,需要策略,以保证医疗从业人员,自我收集是一种适当的筛选方式,并确保人们意识到他们的筛选选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Journal of General Practice
Australian Journal of General Practice Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
284
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of General Practice (AJGP) aims to provide relevant, evidence-based, clearly articulated information to Australian general practitioners (GPs) to assist them in providing the highest quality patient care, applicable to the varied geographic and social contexts in which GPs work and to all GP roles as clinician, researcher, educator, practice team member and opinion leader. All articles are subject to peer review before they are accepted for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信