Automated quality evaluation of dental panoramic radiographs using deep learning.

IF 2.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Imaging Science in Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-10 DOI:10.5624/isd.20240232
Nazila Ameli, Masoud Miri Moghaddam, Hollis Lai, Camila Pacheco-Pereira
{"title":"Automated quality evaluation of dental panoramic radiographs using deep learning.","authors":"Nazila Ameli, Masoud Miri Moghaddam, Hollis Lai, Camila Pacheco-Pereira","doi":"10.5624/isd.20240232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Panoramic radiographs are instrumental in dental diagnosis but face quality issues related to contrast, artifacts, positioning, and coverage, which can impact diagnostic accuracy. Although expert assessment is the accepted standard, it is time-consuming and prone to inconsistency. Artificial intelligence offers an automated, objective solution for evaluating radiograph quality, increasing efficiency and reducing inter-rater variability.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study aimed to develop a deep learning (DL)-based model for evaluating the quality of dental panoramic radiographs. A dataset of 1,000 panoramic images, collected from 2018 to 2023, was assessed by 2 trained dentists using predefined grading criteria for contrast/density, artifact presence, coverage area, patient positioning, and overall quality. These expert-annotated scores were used as the ground truth to train and validate 5 YOLOv8 classification models, each targeting a specific quality criterion. The models' performance was evaluated on a separate test set using performance metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The YOLOv8 models achieved classification accuracies of 87.2%, 74.1%, 77.3%, 97.9%, and 79.3% for artifact detection, coverage area, patient positioning, contrast/density, and overall image quality, respectively. The model used to classify images as clinically acceptable or unacceptable exhibited an average accuracy of 81.4%, demonstrating its potential for real-world application.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight the feasibility of DL-based automated image quality assessment for panoramic radiographs. The high accuracy of the proposed model suggests its potential integration into clinical workflows to assist practitioners in efficiently evaluating radiograph quality. Additionally, such a model could represent an educational tool for dental students, improving radiographic techniques and reducing unnecessary retakes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51714,"journal":{"name":"Imaging Science in Dentistry","volume":"55 2","pages":"175-188"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12210116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging Science in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.20240232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Panoramic radiographs are instrumental in dental diagnosis but face quality issues related to contrast, artifacts, positioning, and coverage, which can impact diagnostic accuracy. Although expert assessment is the accepted standard, it is time-consuming and prone to inconsistency. Artificial intelligence offers an automated, objective solution for evaluating radiograph quality, increasing efficiency and reducing inter-rater variability.

Materials and methods: This study aimed to develop a deep learning (DL)-based model for evaluating the quality of dental panoramic radiographs. A dataset of 1,000 panoramic images, collected from 2018 to 2023, was assessed by 2 trained dentists using predefined grading criteria for contrast/density, artifact presence, coverage area, patient positioning, and overall quality. These expert-annotated scores were used as the ground truth to train and validate 5 YOLOv8 classification models, each targeting a specific quality criterion. The models' performance was evaluated on a separate test set using performance metrics.

Results: The YOLOv8 models achieved classification accuracies of 87.2%, 74.1%, 77.3%, 97.9%, and 79.3% for artifact detection, coverage area, patient positioning, contrast/density, and overall image quality, respectively. The model used to classify images as clinically acceptable or unacceptable exhibited an average accuracy of 81.4%, demonstrating its potential for real-world application.

Conclusion: These findings highlight the feasibility of DL-based automated image quality assessment for panoramic radiographs. The high accuracy of the proposed model suggests its potential integration into clinical workflows to assist practitioners in efficiently evaluating radiograph quality. Additionally, such a model could represent an educational tool for dental students, improving radiographic techniques and reducing unnecessary retakes.

使用深度学习的牙科全景x光片自动质量评估。
目的:全景x线片在牙科诊断中是有用的,但面临与对比度、伪影、定位和覆盖有关的质量问题,这些问题会影响诊断的准确性。虽然专家评估是公认的标准,但它耗时且容易出现不一致。人工智能提供了一种自动化的、客观的解决方案来评估x光片的质量,提高了效率,减少了内部差异。材料与方法:本研究旨在建立一个基于深度学习(DL)的口腔全景x线片质量评估模型。从2018年到2023年收集的1000张全景图像数据集由2名训练有素的牙医使用预定义的对比度/密度、伪影存在、覆盖区域、患者位置和整体质量评分标准进行评估。这些专家注释的分数被用作训练和验证5个YOLOv8分类模型的基础真值,每个模型都针对特定的质量标准。模型的性能在使用性能指标的单独测试集上进行评估。结果:YOLOv8模型在伪影检测、覆盖面积、患者定位、对比度/密度和整体图像质量方面的分类准确率分别为87.2%、74.1%、77.3%、97.9%和79.3%。用于将图像分类为临床可接受或不可接受的模型显示出81.4%的平均准确率,表明其在现实世界中的应用潜力。结论:这些发现强调了基于dl的全景x线片图像质量自动评估的可行性。所提出的模型的高准确性表明,它有可能整合到临床工作流程中,以帮助从业者有效地评估x光片质量。此外,这样的模型可以代表牙科学生的教育工具,提高放射技术和减少不必要的重修。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Imaging Science in Dentistry
Imaging Science in Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信