Slit Lamp Findings in Scleral Lens Wearers With and Without Subjective Fogging.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Jennifer Swingle Fogt, Muriel Schornack, Cherie Nau, Jennifer S Harthan, Amy Nau, Ellen Shorter
{"title":"Slit Lamp Findings in Scleral Lens Wearers With and Without Subjective Fogging.","authors":"Jennifer Swingle Fogt, Muriel Schornack, Cherie Nau, Jennifer S Harthan, Amy Nau, Ellen Shorter","doi":"10.1097/ICL.0000000000001204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The term \"midday fogging\" is used to describe visual blur, which some scleral lens wearers experience during use. The purpose of this study was to determine whether fit characteristics and biomicroscopic findings in habitual scleral lens wearers contribute to symptoms of fogging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, observational study analyzed 48 habitual scleral lens wearers who wore lenses in one or both eyes from five clinical sites. Participants indicated whether they experienced fogging. Slit Lamp biomicroscopy was performed to evaluate fluid reservoir (FR) depth and presence or absence of limbal clearance, edge lift or impingement, conjunctival prolapse, and front surface nonwetting. Presence or absence of mucous strands, fine particulate debris, and diffuse haze in the FR were also noted. Backward elimination binomial logistic regression using one eye per participant compared the findings of eyes with and without subjective fogging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fogging was reported by 58% participants (28/48). Statistical analysis found no significant differences in scleral lens fitting characteristics of eyes with and without reported fogging. The presence of front surface nonwetting and diffuse haze were statistically higher in eyes with fogging.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, front surface nonwetting and diffuse haze observed with Slit Lamp biomicroscopy were associated with patient-reported scleral lens fogging.</p>","PeriodicalId":50457,"journal":{"name":"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000001204","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The term "midday fogging" is used to describe visual blur, which some scleral lens wearers experience during use. The purpose of this study was to determine whether fit characteristics and biomicroscopic findings in habitual scleral lens wearers contribute to symptoms of fogging.

Methods: This prospective, observational study analyzed 48 habitual scleral lens wearers who wore lenses in one or both eyes from five clinical sites. Participants indicated whether they experienced fogging. Slit Lamp biomicroscopy was performed to evaluate fluid reservoir (FR) depth and presence or absence of limbal clearance, edge lift or impingement, conjunctival prolapse, and front surface nonwetting. Presence or absence of mucous strands, fine particulate debris, and diffuse haze in the FR were also noted. Backward elimination binomial logistic regression using one eye per participant compared the findings of eyes with and without subjective fogging.

Results: Fogging was reported by 58% participants (28/48). Statistical analysis found no significant differences in scleral lens fitting characteristics of eyes with and without reported fogging. The presence of front surface nonwetting and diffuse haze were statistically higher in eyes with fogging.

Conclusion: In this study, front surface nonwetting and diffuse haze observed with Slit Lamp biomicroscopy were associated with patient-reported scleral lens fogging.

裂隙灯在巩膜晶状体配戴者有无主观雾化中的表现。
目的:“正午起雾”一词是用来描述一些巩膜镜片佩戴者在使用过程中出现的视觉模糊。本研究的目的是确定习惯性巩膜晶状体配戴者的贴合特征和生物显微镜检查结果是否与雾化症状有关。方法:这项前瞻性观察性研究分析了来自5个临床地点的48名单眼或双眼习惯性巩膜晶状体配戴者。参与者表明他们是否经历过雾霾。裂隙灯生物显微镜用于评估储液层(FR)深度,有无角膜缘间隙、边缘提升或撞击、结膜脱垂和前表面不湿润。此外,FR中有无粘液链、细颗粒碎片和弥漫性雾霾。每个参与者使用一只眼睛进行反向消除二项逻辑回归,比较了有和没有主观雾化的眼睛的结果。结果:58%的参与者报告起雾(28/48)。统计分析发现,有和没有报告雾气的眼睛的巩膜晶状体贴合特征没有显著差异。在有雾的眼睛中,前表面不湿润和弥漫性雾的存在在统计学上更高。结论:在本研究中,裂隙灯生物显微镜观察到的前表面不湿润和弥漫性雾霾与患者报告的巩膜晶状体雾蒙蒙有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
150
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Eye & Contact Lens: Science and Clinical Practice is the official journal of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists (CLAO), an international educational association for anterior segment research and clinical practice of interest to ophthalmologists, optometrists, and other vision care providers and researchers. Focusing especially on contact lenses, it also covers dry eye disease, MGD, infections, toxicity of drops and contact lens care solutions, topography, cornea surgery and post-operative care, optics, refractive surgery and corneal stability (eg, UV cross-linking). Peer-reviewed and published six times annually, it is a highly respected scientific journal in its field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信