The challenge of assessing the needs of vulnerable populations in public health: Promoting an approach grounded in proportionate universalism principles.
IF 2.6 3区 医学Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Kenji Leta, Maïté Verloigne, Lieve Bradt, Shana Sabbe, Babette Demeester, Emelien Lauwerier, Sara Willems
{"title":"The challenge of assessing the needs of vulnerable populations in public health: Promoting an approach grounded in proportionate universalism principles.","authors":"Kenji Leta, Maïté Verloigne, Lieve Bradt, Shana Sabbe, Babette Demeester, Emelien Lauwerier, Sara Willems","doi":"10.1177/14034948251352643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Health inequities persist as a pressing public health challenge, often rooted in unequal access to resources, opportunities and privileges that disproportionately affect vulnerable populations. Proportionate universalism offers a promising approach by advocating for universal health interventions that adjust in scale and intensity to meet varying levels of needs. Despite its potential, implementing proportionate universalism in health promotion remains challenging, particularly when narrowly assessing vulnerability using socioeconomic indicators alone, which can misclassify or stigmatise vulnerable groups and perpetuate inequities. This commentary reflects on these challenges in the context of developing a smoking prevention intervention for adolescents facing societal vulnerability and proposes more nuanced strategies for assessing needs within a proportionate universalism framework.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong><b>This article highlights the complexity of defining and assessing vulnerability in public health research and practice. By sharing insights from our research process, we advocate for a broader understanding of adolescent vulnerability that moves beyond traditional socioeconomic measures. We hope to inspire more inclusive and equitable health promotion interventions that are responsive to the diverse and intersecting forms of</b> <b>disadvantage individuals may experience.</b></p>","PeriodicalId":49568,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":"14034948251352643"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948251352643","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: Health inequities persist as a pressing public health challenge, often rooted in unequal access to resources, opportunities and privileges that disproportionately affect vulnerable populations. Proportionate universalism offers a promising approach by advocating for universal health interventions that adjust in scale and intensity to meet varying levels of needs. Despite its potential, implementing proportionate universalism in health promotion remains challenging, particularly when narrowly assessing vulnerability using socioeconomic indicators alone, which can misclassify or stigmatise vulnerable groups and perpetuate inequities. This commentary reflects on these challenges in the context of developing a smoking prevention intervention for adolescents facing societal vulnerability and proposes more nuanced strategies for assessing needs within a proportionate universalism framework.
Conclusions: This article highlights the complexity of defining and assessing vulnerability in public health research and practice. By sharing insights from our research process, we advocate for a broader understanding of adolescent vulnerability that moves beyond traditional socioeconomic measures. We hope to inspire more inclusive and equitable health promotion interventions that are responsive to the diverse and intersecting forms ofdisadvantage individuals may experience.
期刊介绍:
The Scandinavian Journal of Public Health is an international peer-reviewed journal which has a vision to: publish public health research of good quality; contribute to the conceptual and methodological development of public health; contribute to global health issues; contribute to news and overviews of public health developments and health policy developments in the Nordic countries; reflect the multidisciplinarity of public health.