Spatial phenotyping of human bronchial airways in obstructive lung disease.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Latifa Khalfaoui, Raymond M Moore, Jose C Villasboas, Kaitlyn R Whitaker, Brenna C Novotny, Michael A Thompson, Christina M Pabelick, Y S Prakash
{"title":"Spatial phenotyping of human bronchial airways in obstructive lung disease.","authors":"Latifa Khalfaoui, Raymond M Moore, Jose C Villasboas, Kaitlyn R Whitaker, Brenna C Novotny, Michael A Thompson, Christina M Pabelick, Y S Prakash","doi":"10.1186/s12931-025-03315-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic respiratory diseases such as asthma and COPD involve interactions between multiple resident and immune cell types within bronchial airways, resulting in structural and functional changes. Thus cellular heterogeneity, arrangements and associated neighborhoods as well as interactions between cells and matrices represent intriguing yet challenging areas of study. Spatial phenotypic profiling facilitates exploration of these issues of the cellular microenvironment and identification of context-dependent cell-cell interactions. Utilizing spatial phenotyping, we interrogated the features and cellular landscape of lungs from non-asthmatics, asthmatics, and COPD in FFPE samples by developing a 10-plex antibody panel for the Akoya PhenoCycler<sup>®</sup>-Fusion system, focused on immune cells (CD45, CD3, CD4, CD8), proliferative cells (Ki67, PCNA), angiogenesis (CD34), epithelium (E-cadherin), smooth muscle (SMA) and extracellular matrix (collagen). We performed cell segmentation on multiplex immunofluorescence images and quantified marker intensity in each cell. Phenotypes were manually identified after normalization, integration, and clustering cells across samples. The composition, cell profiling, and distribution varied significantly between asthmatics and COPD compared to non-asthmatics emphasizing disease heterogeneity. Spatially agnostic analysis revealed that the matrix cluster was more abundant in COPD compared to non-asthmatics and asthmatics, consistent with a greater role for fibrosis. However, asthmatic patients had a higher proportion of unclassified and CD8 + clusters highlighting immune responses. Co-localization analysis showed near random distribution in non-asthmatics. But strong spatial interaction between T cells and other immune or matrix cells in asthma, and a higher avoidance of smooth muscle and immune cells, and of proliferative markers in both asthmatic and COPD. Niche analysis demonstrated different recurrent cell-cell interactions in asthmatic and COPD cohorts. In COPD, the matrix cell-enriched niche was more abundant, while in asthmatics, the unclassified cell-enriched niche was more prevalent compared to non-asthmatics. These findings provide insights into differential spatial organization of cells and tissues in asthma and COPD, with immune and epithelial mechanisms suggesting active inflammation and remodeling in asthma, but fibrotic processes in COPD, and potential role for vascular processes in both conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49131,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Research","volume":"26 1","pages":"232"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12224523/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-025-03315-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic respiratory diseases such as asthma and COPD involve interactions between multiple resident and immune cell types within bronchial airways, resulting in structural and functional changes. Thus cellular heterogeneity, arrangements and associated neighborhoods as well as interactions between cells and matrices represent intriguing yet challenging areas of study. Spatial phenotypic profiling facilitates exploration of these issues of the cellular microenvironment and identification of context-dependent cell-cell interactions. Utilizing spatial phenotyping, we interrogated the features and cellular landscape of lungs from non-asthmatics, asthmatics, and COPD in FFPE samples by developing a 10-plex antibody panel for the Akoya PhenoCycler®-Fusion system, focused on immune cells (CD45, CD3, CD4, CD8), proliferative cells (Ki67, PCNA), angiogenesis (CD34), epithelium (E-cadherin), smooth muscle (SMA) and extracellular matrix (collagen). We performed cell segmentation on multiplex immunofluorescence images and quantified marker intensity in each cell. Phenotypes were manually identified after normalization, integration, and clustering cells across samples. The composition, cell profiling, and distribution varied significantly between asthmatics and COPD compared to non-asthmatics emphasizing disease heterogeneity. Spatially agnostic analysis revealed that the matrix cluster was more abundant in COPD compared to non-asthmatics and asthmatics, consistent with a greater role for fibrosis. However, asthmatic patients had a higher proportion of unclassified and CD8 + clusters highlighting immune responses. Co-localization analysis showed near random distribution in non-asthmatics. But strong spatial interaction between T cells and other immune or matrix cells in asthma, and a higher avoidance of smooth muscle and immune cells, and of proliferative markers in both asthmatic and COPD. Niche analysis demonstrated different recurrent cell-cell interactions in asthmatic and COPD cohorts. In COPD, the matrix cell-enriched niche was more abundant, while in asthmatics, the unclassified cell-enriched niche was more prevalent compared to non-asthmatics. These findings provide insights into differential spatial organization of cells and tissues in asthma and COPD, with immune and epithelial mechanisms suggesting active inflammation and remodeling in asthma, but fibrotic processes in COPD, and potential role for vascular processes in both conditions.

阻塞性肺疾病患者支气管气道的空间表型分析。
慢性呼吸系统疾病,如哮喘和COPD,涉及支气管气道内多种常驻细胞和免疫细胞类型之间的相互作用,导致结构和功能改变。因此,细胞的异质性、排列和相关的邻域以及细胞和基质之间的相互作用代表了有趣但具有挑战性的研究领域。空间表型分析有助于探索细胞微环境的这些问题和识别上下文依赖的细胞-细胞相互作用。利用空间表型,我们通过为Akoya PhenoCycler®-Fusion系统开发10-plex抗体面板,研究了非哮喘患者、哮喘患者和COPD患者肺FFPE样本的特征和细胞景观,重点关注免疫细胞(CD45、CD3、CD4、CD8)、增殖细胞(Ki67、PCNA)、血管生成(CD34)、上皮细胞(E-cadherin)、平滑肌(SMA)和细胞外基质(胶原)。我们对多重免疫荧光图像进行细胞分割,并定量每个细胞的标记强度。在标准化、整合和聚类细胞后,在样本中手动识别表型。与非哮喘患者相比,哮喘患者和COPD患者的组成、细胞谱和分布差异显著,强调了疾病的异质性。空间不可知分析显示,与非哮喘患者和哮喘患者相比,基质簇在COPD中更丰富,与纤维化的作用更大一致。然而,哮喘患者有更高比例的未分类和CD8 +簇突出免疫反应。共定位分析显示非哮喘患者的分布接近随机。但哮喘患者T细胞与其他免疫细胞或基质细胞之间存在强烈的空间相互作用,哮喘患者和COPD患者对平滑肌细胞和免疫细胞以及增殖标志物的回避程度更高。生态位分析显示哮喘和COPD队列中不同的复发性细胞-细胞相互作用。在COPD中,基质细胞富集的生态位更丰富,而在哮喘患者中,未分类细胞富集的生态位比非哮喘患者更普遍。这些发现提供了对哮喘和COPD中细胞和组织空间组织差异的见解,免疫和上皮机制提示哮喘中有活动性炎症和重塑,但COPD中有纤维化过程,以及血管过程在这两种情况下的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory Research
Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
1.70%
发文量
314
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Respiratory Research publishes high-quality clinical and basic research, review and commentary articles on all aspects of respiratory medicine and related diseases. As the leading fully open access journal in the field, Respiratory Research provides an essential resource for pulmonologists, allergists, immunologists and other physicians, researchers, healthcare workers and medical students with worldwide dissemination of articles resulting in high visibility and generating international discussion. Topics of specific interest include asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cystic fibrosis, genetics, infectious diseases, interstitial lung diseases, lung development, lung tumors, occupational and environmental factors, pulmonary circulation, pulmonary pharmacology and therapeutics, respiratory immunology, respiratory physiology, and sleep-related respiratory problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信